From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3D1C43381 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 17:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8380D21916 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 17:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728408AbfCVRF6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:05:58 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:20937 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727706AbfCVRF6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:05:58 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2019 10:05:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,256,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="329774387" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.72.86]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2019 10:05:52 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1h7Nc7-0004wO-0W; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:05:51 +0200 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:05:50 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Petr Mladek , Linux Kernel Mailing List , scsi , Linux PM list , Linux MMC List , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ACPI Devel Maling List , netdev , linux-btrfs , linux-pci , sparclinux , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, ceph-devel , Linux MM , Linux ARM , Lars Ellenberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove support for deprecated %pf and %pF in vsprintf Message-ID: <20190322170550.GX9224@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20190322132108.25501-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20190322135350.2btpno7vspvewxvk@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190322135350.2btpno7vspvewxvk@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:53:50PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Porting a patch > forward should have no issues either as checkpatch.pl has been complaining > of the use of %pf and %pF for a while now. And that's exactly the reason why I think instead of removing warning on checkpatch, it makes sense to convert to an error for a while. People are tending read documentation on internet and thus might have outdated one. And yes, the compiler doesn't tell a thing about it. P.S. Though, if majority of people will tell that I'm wrong, then it's okay to remove. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko