Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Add virtio-iommu driver

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, joro@8bytes.org,
	jasowang@redhat.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, frowand.list@gmail.com,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	tnowicki@caviumnetworks.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, bharat.bhushan@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Add virtio-iommu driver
Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 12:31:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190512123022-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190115121959.23763-1-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 12:19:52PM +0000, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Implement the virtio-iommu driver, following specification v0.9 [1].
> 
> This is a simple rebase onto Linux v5.0-rc2. We now use the
> dev_iommu_fwspec_get() helper introduced in v5.0 instead of accessing
> dev->iommu_fwspec, but there aren't any functional change from v6 [2].
> 
> Our current goal for virtio-iommu is to get a paravirtual IOMMU working
> on Arm, and enable device assignment to guest userspace. In this
> use-case the mappings are static, and don't require optimal performance,
> so this series tries to keep things simple. However there is plenty more
> to do for features and optimizations, and having this base in v5.1 would
> be good. Given that most of the changes are to drivers/iommu, I believe
> the driver and future changes should go via the IOMMU tree.
> 
> You can find Linux driver and kvmtool device on v0.9.2 branches [3],
> module and x86 support on virtio-iommu/devel. Also tested with Eric's
> QEMU device [4]. Please note that the series depends on Robin's
> probe-deferral fix [5], which will hopefully land in v5.0.
> 
> [1] Virtio-iommu specification v0.9, sources and pdf
>     git://linux-arm.org/virtio-iommu.git virtio-iommu/v0.9
>     http://jpbrucker.net/virtio-iommu/spec/v0.9/virtio-iommu-v0.9.pdf
> 
> [2] [PATCH v6 0/7] Add virtio-iommu driver
>     https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2018-December/032127.html
> 
> [3] git://linux-arm.org/linux-jpb.git virtio-iommu/v0.9.2
>     git://linux-arm.org/kvmtool-jpb.git virtio-iommu/v0.9.2
> 
> [4] [RFC v9 00/17] VIRTIO-IOMMU device
>     https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg575578.html
> 
> [5] [PATCH] iommu/of: Fix probe-deferral
>     https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg698371.html

OK this has been in next for a while.

Last time IOMMU maintainers objected. Are objections
still in force?

If not could we get acks please?

> Jean-Philippe Brucker (7):
>   dt-bindings: virtio-mmio: Add IOMMU description
>   dt-bindings: virtio: Add virtio-pci-iommu node
>   of: Allow the iommu-map property to omit untranslated devices
>   PCI: OF: Initialize dev->fwnode appropriately
>   iommu: Add virtio-iommu driver
>   iommu/virtio: Add probe request
>   iommu/virtio: Add event queue
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/virtio/iommu.txt      |   66 +
>  .../devicetree/bindings/virtio/mmio.txt       |   30 +
>  MAINTAINERS                                   |    7 +
>  drivers/iommu/Kconfig                         |   11 +
>  drivers/iommu/Makefile                        |    1 +
>  drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c                  | 1158 +++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/of/base.c                             |   10 +-
>  drivers/pci/of.c                              |    7 +
>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_ids.h               |    1 +
>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h             |  161 +++
>  10 files changed, 1449 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/iommu.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
>  create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.19.1