Linux-PCI Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, "kishon@ti.com" <kishon@ti.com>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"M.h. Lian" <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>,
	Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>, Roy Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>,
	"jingoohan1@gmail.com" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Z.q. Hou" <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:49:46 +0100
Message-ID: <20190912124943.GD9720@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM5PR04MB329970AE2C1812E88B9DE5A2F5B90@AM5PR04MB3299.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 01:47:36AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
> > Sent: 2019年9月2日 20:46
> > To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
> > Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; shawnguo@kernel.org; Leo
> > Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; kishon@ti.com; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; M.h.
> > Lian <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; Roy
> > Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>; jingoohan1@gmail.com;
> > gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
> > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
> > arnd@arndb.de; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; Z.q. Hou
> > <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for
> > ls1088a and ls2088a
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:17:14AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> > > Add PCIe EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a, there are some
> > > difference between LS1 and LS2 platform, so refactor the code of the
> > > EP driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > >  - This is a new patch for supporting the ls1088a and ls2088a platform.
> > > v3:
> > >  - Adjust the some struct assignment order in probe function.
> > >
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 72
> > > +++++++++++++++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > index 5f0cb99..723bbe5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > @@ -20,27 +20,29 @@
> > >
> > >  #define PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET		0x1000	/* DBI2 base address*/
> > >
> > > -struct ls_pcie_ep {
> > > -	struct dw_pcie		*pci;
> > > -	struct pci_epc_features	*ls_epc;
> > > +#define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > > +
> > > +struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata {
> > > +	u32				func_offset;
> > > +	const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops	*ops;
> > > +	const struct dw_pcie_ops	*dw_pcie_ops;
> > >  };
> > >
> > > -#define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > > +struct ls_pcie_ep {
> > > +	struct dw_pcie			*pci;
> > > +	struct pci_epc_features		*ls_epc;
> > > +	const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata *drvdata; };
> > >
> > >  static int ls_pcie_establish_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)  {
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static const struct dw_pcie_ops ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > > +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > >  	.start_link = ls_pcie_establish_link,  };
> > >
> > > -static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> > > -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls-pcie-ep",},
> > > -	{ },
> > > -};
> > > -
> > >  static const struct pci_epc_features*  ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct
> > > dw_pcie_ep *ep)  { @@ -87,10 +89,39 @@ static int
> > > ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> > >  	}
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops pcie_ep_ops = {
> > > +static unsigned int ls_pcie_ep_func_conf_select(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep,
> > > +						u8 func_no)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > > +	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> > > +
> > > +	WARN_ON(func_no && !pcie->drvdata->func_offset);
> > > +	return pcie->drvdata->func_offset * func_no; }
> > > +
> > > +static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > >  	.ep_init = ls_pcie_ep_init,
> > >  	.raise_irq = ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq,
> > >  	.get_features = ls_pcie_ep_get_features,
> > > +	.func_conf_select = ls_pcie_ep_func_conf_select, };
> > > +
> > > +static const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata ls1_ep_drvdata = {
> > > +	.ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops,
> > > +	.dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata ls2_ep_drvdata = {
> > > +	.func_offset = 0x20000,
> > > +	.ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops,
> > > +	.dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> > > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls1_ep_drvdata },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata },
> > > +	{ },
> > 
> > This removes support for "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" - was that intentional? If you do plan
> > to drop it please make sure you explain why in the commit message. See also
> > my comments in your dt-binding patch.
> 
> In fact, the u-boot will fixup the status property to 'status = enabled' in PCI node of 
> the DTS base on "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" compatible, so "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" is used, I used this
> compatible before, because the driver only support the LS1046a, but this time, I add
> the LS1088a and LS2088a support, and these two boards have some difference form
> LS1046a, so I changed the compatible. I am not sure whether need to add "fsl,ls-pcie-ep"
> in there, could you give some advice, thanks a lot.

It sounds like "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" can be a fallback for "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep".

I'm assuming that if someone used "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep" on ls1088a or ls2088a
hardware it would still work, but without the multiple PF support.

I.e. if "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" is given, treat it as ls1046a.

Thanks,

Andrew Murray

> 
> Thanks 
> Xiaowei
>  
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Andrew Murray
> > 
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie, @@ -103,7
> > > +134,7 @@ static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie,
> > >  	int ret;
> > >
> > >  	ep = &pci->ep;
> > > -	ep->ops = &pcie_ep_ops;
> > > +	ep->ops = pcie->drvdata->ops;
> > >
> > >  	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > "addr_space");
> > >  	if (!res)
> > > @@ -142,20 +173,23 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	if (!ls_epc)
> > >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > -	dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > "regs");
> > > -	pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> > > -	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > > -		return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
> > > +	pcie->drvdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > >
> > > -	pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET;
> > >  	pci->dev = dev;
> > > -	pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
> > > -	pcie->pci = pci;
> > > +	pci->ops = pcie->drvdata->dw_pcie_ops;
> > >
> > >  	ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
> > >
> > > +	pcie->pci = pci;
> > >  	pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
> > >
> > > +	dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > "regs");
> > > +	pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > > +		return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
> > > +
> > > +	pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET;
> > > +
> > >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> > >
> > >  	ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
> > > --
> > > 2.9.5
> > >

  reply index

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-02  3:17 [PATCH v3 00/11] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] PCI: designware-ep: Add multiple PFs support for DWC Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 16:26   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  3:43     ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-26 10:29       ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-26 13:38         ` Gustavo Pimentel
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] PCI: designware-ep: Add the doorbell mode of MSI-X in EP mode Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] PCI: designware-ep: Move the function of getting MSI capability forward Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] PCI: designware-ep: Modify MSI and MSIX CAP way of finding Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 15:07   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  2:33     ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] dt-bindings: pci: layerscape-pci: add compatible strings for ls1088a and ls2088a Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 12:31   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  1:33     ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] PCI: layerscape: Fix some format issue of the code Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting capability with different PEX Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 13:37   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  2:13     ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] PCI: layerscape: Modify the MSIX to the doorbell mode Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 12:01   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-12 11:24     ` Gustavo Pimentel
2019-09-14  6:37       ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-16  8:54         ` Gustavo Pimentel
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 12:46   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  1:47     ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-12 12:49       ` Andrew Murray [this message]
2019-09-14  4:10         ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-16 14:37           ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-18  3:17             ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] arm64: dts: layerscape: Add PCIe EP node for ls1088a Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 13:06   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  2:01     ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-12 13:01       ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-14  4:15         ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02 12:54   ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-03  1:52     ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-12 12:59       ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-14  4:13         ` Xiaowei Bao
2019-09-02  3:52 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Z.q. Hou
2019-09-02  3:54   ` Xiaowei Bao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190912124943.GD9720@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=minghuan.lian@nxp.com \
    --cc=mingkai.hu@nxp.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=roy.zang@nxp.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaowei.bao@nxp.com \
    --cc=zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-PCI Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/0 linux-pci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-pci linux-pci/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci \
		linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-pci

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-pci


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git