From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D98C32793 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:32:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B503D21835 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:32:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1569778320; bh=kZEPCmBzfnruGMTP4vMPzELIRnJc++Rbxcjejt8mrIU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=yIqESVvJQqHm2ZnZjtTfXRncr3/ZZWsSTM//UCGsmgKoIXCu6NNeRN/60zILjBHZg KVG765kcWXI+WmilmrzFReqK+YO/LmE+MqvldZBZYYTzqfQyisie1fRzd0W5ELYxGi 9vkOwLQr7Plv1lZFKWb7R+vcY2tFQ45o7Ap6oQa8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729561AbfI2Rb4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Sep 2019 13:31:56 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42606 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729547AbfI2Rb4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Sep 2019 13:31:56 -0400 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3539C21D7C; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:31:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1569778316; bh=kZEPCmBzfnruGMTP4vMPzELIRnJc++Rbxcjejt8mrIU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FLHYu64U6DklqKKxtnl8uwnXg930oS2e/YaIw1h785cK8qm0Z3USup6pnzWuoVLnn SKLR5bQ+/1pmHregJGU5PpvOt0I1rHq5SUj5Fv80svTXUucynrFuP64TVjRa/NffRI n3CjITuhUxQA+R39OTC5VPHC05O8IqS9z/Emws3U= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Krzysztof Wilczynski , Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Petazzoni , Sasha Levin , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.3 32/49] PCI: Use static const struct, not const static struct Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 13:30:32 -0400 Message-Id: <20190929173053.8400-32-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190929173053.8400-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190929173053.8400-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org From: Krzysztof Wilczynski [ Upstream commit 8050f3f6645ae0f7e4c1304593f6f7eb2ee7d85c ] Move the static keyword to the front of declarations of pci_regs_behavior[] and pcie_cap_regs_behavior[], which resolves compiler warnings when building with "W=1": drivers/pci/pci-bridge-emul.c:41:1: warning: ‘static’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration] const static struct pci_bridge_reg_behavior pci_regs_behavior[] = { ^ drivers/pci/pci-bridge-emul.c:176:1: warning: ‘static’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration] const static struct pci_bridge_reg_behavior pcie_cap_regs_behavior[] = { ^ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190826151436.4672-1-kw@linux.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190828131733.5817-1-kw@linux.com Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczynski Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/pci/pci-bridge-emul.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-bridge-emul.c b/drivers/pci/pci-bridge-emul.c index 06083b86d4f45..5fd90105510d9 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci-bridge-emul.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-bridge-emul.c @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct pci_bridge_reg_behavior { u32 rsvd; }; -const static struct pci_bridge_reg_behavior pci_regs_behavior[] = { +static const struct pci_bridge_reg_behavior pci_regs_behavior[] = { [PCI_VENDOR_ID / 4] = { .ro = ~0 }, [PCI_COMMAND / 4] = { .rw = (PCI_COMMAND_IO | PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY | @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ const static struct pci_bridge_reg_behavior pci_regs_behavior[] = { }, }; -const static struct pci_bridge_reg_behavior pcie_cap_regs_behavior[] = { +static const struct pci_bridge_reg_behavior pcie_cap_regs_behavior[] = { [PCI_CAP_LIST_ID / 4] = { /* * Capability ID, Next Capability Pointer and -- 2.20.1