From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42680ECE58F for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E50221928 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="rHXUMkGe" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728854AbfJOJIS (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:08:18 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:37150 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726373AbfJOJIS (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:08:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PE8+nIoxzD1zQdezsHIaVtBqecbIPWzv31qj99+GMFI=; b=rHXUMkGeY1/C+REceyjWg+4Rm 01qjEdQ6LSV1hNiGadSYIGoQaUN97i2TAxt77SO9nWKaaBDGqACYgzfg6kiZjoOfvDWHvfW5yh1aY KyV9+zesdK06b1T11yiw+ZF81rVkFrdjOfPZvHvwd0E4nEU2l9/M9Paq2TFNVojY4Q5osIbiipDKg C3reJlQ+75m6pOM9628sIktXXyQ0osAu8zYoVXCqAMPh8wkWAeNjueaE0aZLD6rBfiWQeCIBm9EFW OoTv9Gvz2PNSeTmiyuvOIpKzXV3yiPEFR1Hr4a6hsnvTB5AJ5c4w1JjHh6QDxGQYDHfmJwnmvDQMd E4DF8O0lA==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:43732) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKIoB-0003R7-Is; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:07:59 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iKIo8-0005B3-As; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:07:56 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:07:56 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Xiaowei Bao Cc: "Z.q. Hou" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , Leo Li , "kishon@ti.com" , "lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" , "M.h. Lian" , "andrew.murray@arm.com" , Mingkai Hu , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] PCI: mobiveil: Add PCIe Gen4 EP driver for NXP Layerscape SoCs Message-ID: <20191015090756.GS25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20190916021742.22844-1-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> <20190916021742.22844-4-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> <20190924163850.GY25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:46:12AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin > > Sent: 2019年9月25日 0:39 > > To: Xiaowei Bao > > Cc: Z.q. Hou ; bhelgaas@google.com; > > robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; shawnguo@kernel.org; Leo Li > > ; kishon@ti.com; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; M.h. Lian > > ; andrew.murray@arm.com; Mingkai Hu > > ; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] PCI: mobiveil: Add PCIe Gen4 EP driver for NXP > > Layerscape SoCs > > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:17:39AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > > > This PCIe controller is based on the Mobiveil GPEX IP, it work in EP > > > mode if select this config opteration. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao > > > --- > > > MAINTAINERS | 2 + > > > drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig | 17 ++- > > > drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile | 1 + > > > .../controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.c | 156 > > > +++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 4 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode > > > 100644 drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.c > > > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index b997056..0858b54 100644 > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > @@ -12363,11 +12363,13 @@ F: > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/*layerscape* > > > > > > PCI DRIVER FOR NXP LAYERSCAPE GEN4 CONTROLLER > > > M: Hou Zhiqiang > > > +M: Xiaowei Bao > > > L: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > > > L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > > S: Maintained > > > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pcie-gen4.txt > > > F: drivers/pci/controller/mobibeil/pcie-layerscape-gen4.c > > > +F: drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.c > > > > > > PCI DRIVER FOR GENERIC OF HOSTS > > > M: Will Deacon > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig > > > b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig > > > index 2054950..0696b6e 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig > > > @@ -27,13 +27,24 @@ config PCIE_MOBIVEIL_PLAT > > > for address translation and it is a PCIe Gen4 IP. > > > > > > config PCIE_LAYERSCAPE_GEN4 > > > - bool "Freescale Layerscape PCIe Gen4 controller" > > > + bool "Freescale Layerscpe PCIe Gen4 controller in RC mode" > > > depends on PCI > > > depends on OF && (ARM64 || ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) > > > depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN > > > select PCIE_MOBIVEIL_HOST > > > help > > > Say Y here if you want PCIe Gen4 controller support on > > > - Layerscape SoCs. The PCIe controller can work in RC or > > > - EP mode according to RCW[HOST_AGT_PEX] setting. > > > + Layerscape SoCs. And the PCIe controller work in RC mode > > > + by setting the RCW[HOST_AGT_PEX] to 0. > > > + > > > +config PCIE_LAYERSCAPE_GEN4_EP > > > + bool "Freescale Layerscpe PCIe Gen4 controller in EP mode" > > > + depends on PCI > > > + depends on OF && (ARM64 || ARCH_LAYERSCAPE) > > > + depends on PCI_ENDPOINT > > > + select PCIE_MOBIVEIL_EP > > > + help > > > + Say Y here if you want PCIe Gen4 controller support on > > > + Layerscape SoCs. And the PCIe controller work in EP mode > > > + by setting the RCW[HOST_AGT_PEX] to 1. > > > endmenu > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile > > > b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile > > > index 686d41f..6f54856 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile > > > @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_MOBIVEIL_HOST) += > > > pcie-mobiveil-host.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_MOBIVEIL_EP) += pcie-mobiveil-ep.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_MOBIVEIL_PLAT) += pcie-mobiveil-plat.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_LAYERSCAPE_GEN4) += pcie-layerscape-gen4.o > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_LAYERSCAPE_GEN4_EP) += > > pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.o > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.c > > > b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.c > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..7bfec51 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-layerscape-gen4-ep.c > > > @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > +/* > > > + * PCIe controller EP driver for Freescale Layerscape SoCs > > > + * > > > + * Copyright (C) 2019 NXP Semiconductor. > > > + * > > > + * Author: Xiaowei Bao */ > > > + > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > + > > > +#include "pcie-mobiveil.h" > > > + > > > +#define PCIE_LX2_BAR_NUM 4 > > > + > > > +#define to_ls_pcie_g4_ep(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev) > > > + > > > +struct ls_pcie_g4_ep { > > > + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_g4_ep_of_match[] = { > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,lx2160a-pcie-ep",}, > > > + { }, > > > +}; > > > + > > > +static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_g4_epc_features = { > > > + .linkup_notifier = false, > > > + .msi_capable = true, > > > + .msix_capable = true, > > > + .reserved_bar = (1 << BAR_4) | (1 << BAR_5), > > > > BIT(BAR_4) | BIT(BAR_5) ? > > I think use .reserved_bar = (1 << BAR_4) | (1 << BAR_5), is better, because BAR_4 > is not a bit of register. Why is whether it's a register or not relevent? -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up