From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Sergey Miroshnichenko <s.miroshnichenko@yadro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: Disable native PCIe port management
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:54:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114135402.GA200503@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOSf1CHzBJjxOd0f-CZcGPDW6S5GXMvw+6VmzBADJWeP2y1WAQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 12:34:50AM +1100, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 1:31 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is fine, but it feels like sort of a blunt instrument. Is there
> > any practical way to clear pci_host_bridge.native_pcie_hotplug (and
> > native_aer if appropriate) for the PHBs in question? That would also
> > prevent pciehp from binding.
>
> It is a large hammer, but I don't see a better way to handle it for
> the moment. I had another look and my initial assessment was wrong in
> that it's the portbus driver which claims the MSI rather than pciehp
> itself. The MSI in the PCIe capability is shared between hotplug
> events, PMEs, and BW notifications so to make the portbus concept work
> the portbus driver needs to own the interrupt. Basicly, pnv_php and
> portbus are fundamentally at odds with each other and can't be used
> concurrently.
Yeah, that makes sense. Is there a Kconfig symbol for pnv_php? If
so, you could make CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS unselectable in the first place.
But I'm guessing there isn't such a symbol because you probably want
to be able to build generic kernels that run on machines that *can*
use portdrv as well as on PowerNV.
So I'm find with the patch as posted.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-14 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-13 9:40 [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: Disable native PCIe port management Oliver O'Halloran
2019-11-13 14:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-11-14 13:34 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2019-11-14 13:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-11-13 20:39 ` Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-14 13:37 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2019-11-15 4:28 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191114135402.GA200503@google.com \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=s.miroshnichenko@yadro.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).