linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>,
	Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
	Nicholas Johnson <nicholas.johnson-opensource@outlook.com.au>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] PCI: Add missing link delays
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:25:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114232515.GA13757@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191112091617.70282-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:16:15PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is fourth version of the reworked PCIe link delay patch posted earlier
> here:
> 
>   v3: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg88760.html
>   v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20191004123947.11087-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com/
>   v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11106611/
> 
> Changes from v3:
> 
>   * Add tag from Rafael.
>   * Hold pci_bus_sem when accessing bus->devices list.
> 
> Changes from v2:
> 
>   * Rebased on top of pci.git/pci/pm.
>   * Update references to PCIe 5.0 spec.
>   * Take d3cold_delay if child devices into account. This allows ACPI _DSM
>     to lower the delay.
>   * Check for pci_dev->skip_bus_pm in pci_pm_resume_noirq().
>   * Drop comment that mentions pciehp where
>     pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() is called.
>   * Use pcie_downstream_port() in pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus().
> 
> Based on the discussion around v2 there is a potential issue when restoring
> PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2 (regardless these patches) that we may need to retrain the
> link. This series does not include fix for that since it is not yet clear
> how we solve it. I can do that as a separate patch once we agree on the
> solution.
> 
> I'm submitting these two now in hopes that we can get them included for
> v5.5 because there are systems out there that need them in order to
> function properly.
> 
> Changes from v1:
> 
>   * Introduce pcie_wait_for_link_delay() in a separate patch
>   * Tidy up changelog, remove some debug output
>   * Rename pcie_wait_downstream_accessible() to
>     pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus() and make it generic to all PCI
>     bridges.
>   * Handle Tpvrh + Trhfa for conventional PCI even though we don't do PM
>     for them right now.
>   * Use pci_dbg() instead of dev_dbg().
>   * Dropped check for pm_suspend_no_platform() and only check for D3cold.
>   * Drop pcie_get_downstream_delay(), same delay applies equally to all
>     devices (it is not entirely clear from the spec).
> 
> Mika Westerberg (2):
>   PCI: Introduce pcie_wait_for_link_delay()
>   PCI: Add missing link delays required by the PCIe spec
> 
>  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c |  11 ++-
>  drivers/pci/pci.c        | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/pci/pci.h        |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Applied to pci/pm for v5.5, thanks, Mika!

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-14 23:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-12  9:16 [PATCH v4 0/2] PCI: Add missing link delays Mika Westerberg
2019-11-12  9:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: Introduce pcie_wait_for_link_delay() Mika Westerberg
2019-11-12  9:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: Add missing link delays required by the PCIe spec Mika Westerberg
2019-11-14 23:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191114232515.GA13757@google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
    --cc=nicholas.johnson-opensource@outlook.com.au \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).