linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
To: <bhelgaas@google.com>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	<rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <okaya@kernel.org>, <treding@nvidia.com>,
	<jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kthota@nvidia.com>, <mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>,
	<vidyas@nvidia.com>, <sagar.tv@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: Introduce pci_dev_wait() in pci_power_up() API
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 22:53:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191118172310.21373-1-vidyas@nvidia.com> (raw)

Add pci_dev_wait() in pci_power_up() before accessing the configuration
space of a device for the first time in the system resume sequence.
This is  to accommodate devices (Ex:- Intel 750 NVMe) that respond with CRS
status while they get ready for configuration space access and before they
finally start responding with proper values. It also refactors code to move
pci_dev_wait() ahead of pci_power_up() to avoid build error.

Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pci.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 599b2fc99234..7672b9a44bac 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -1020,6 +1020,47 @@ void pci_wakeup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
 		pci_walk_bus(bus, pci_wakeup, NULL);
 }
 
+static int pci_dev_wait(struct pci_dev *dev, char *reset_type, int timeout)
+{
+	int delay = 1;
+	u32 id;
+
+	/*
+	 * After reset, the device should not silently discard config
+	 * requests, but it may still indicate that it needs more time by
+	 * responding to them with CRS completions.  The Root Port will
+	 * generally synthesize ~0 data to complete the read (except when
+	 * CRS SV is enabled and the read was for the Vendor ID; in that
+	 * case it synthesizes 0x0001 data).
+	 *
+	 * Wait for the device to return a non-CRS completion.  Read the
+	 * Command register instead of Vendor ID so we don't have to
+	 * contend with the CRS SV value.
+	 */
+	pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &id);
+	while (id == ~0) {
+		if (delay > timeout) {
+			pci_warn(dev, "not ready %dms after %s; giving up\n",
+				 delay - 1, reset_type);
+			return -ENOTTY;
+		}
+
+		if (delay > 1000)
+			pci_info(dev, "not ready %dms after %s; waiting\n",
+				 delay - 1, reset_type);
+
+		msleep(delay);
+		delay *= 2;
+		pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &id);
+	}
+
+	if (delay > 1000)
+		pci_info(dev, "ready %dms after %s\n", delay - 1,
+			 reset_type);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * pci_power_up - Put the given device into D0
  * @dev: PCI device to power up
@@ -1045,6 +1086,13 @@ int pci_power_up(struct pci_dev *dev)
 		pci_wakeup_bus(dev->subordinate);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Wait for those devices (Ex: Intel 750 NVMe) that are not ready yet
+	 * and responding with CRS statuses for the configuration space
+	 * requests.
+	 */
+	pci_dev_wait(dev, "Switch to D0", PCIE_RESET_READY_POLL_MS);
+
 	return pci_raw_set_power_state(dev, PCI_D0);
 }
 
@@ -4420,47 +4468,6 @@ int pci_wait_for_pending_transaction(struct pci_dev *dev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_wait_for_pending_transaction);
 
-static int pci_dev_wait(struct pci_dev *dev, char *reset_type, int timeout)
-{
-	int delay = 1;
-	u32 id;
-
-	/*
-	 * After reset, the device should not silently discard config
-	 * requests, but it may still indicate that it needs more time by
-	 * responding to them with CRS completions.  The Root Port will
-	 * generally synthesize ~0 data to complete the read (except when
-	 * CRS SV is enabled and the read was for the Vendor ID; in that
-	 * case it synthesizes 0x0001 data).
-	 *
-	 * Wait for the device to return a non-CRS completion.  Read the
-	 * Command register instead of Vendor ID so we don't have to
-	 * contend with the CRS SV value.
-	 */
-	pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &id);
-	while (id == ~0) {
-		if (delay > timeout) {
-			pci_warn(dev, "not ready %dms after %s; giving up\n",
-				 delay - 1, reset_type);
-			return -ENOTTY;
-		}
-
-		if (delay > 1000)
-			pci_info(dev, "not ready %dms after %s; waiting\n",
-				 delay - 1, reset_type);
-
-		msleep(delay);
-		delay *= 2;
-		pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &id);
-	}
-
-	if (delay > 1000)
-		pci_info(dev, "ready %dms after %s\n", delay - 1,
-			 reset_type);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /**
  * pcie_has_flr - check if a device supports function level resets
  * @dev: device to check
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2019-11-18 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-18 17:23 Vidya Sagar [this message]
2019-11-19 23:06 ` [PATCH] PCI: Introduce pci_dev_wait() in pci_power_up() API Bjorn Helgaas
2019-11-20  5:17 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] PCI: Move the definition of pci_dev_wait() Vidya Sagar
2019-11-20  5:17   ` [PATCH V2 2/2] PCI: Introduce pci_dev_wait() in pci_power_up() API Vidya Sagar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191118172310.21373-1-vidyas@nvidia.com \
    --to=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kthota@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=okaya@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sagar.tv@gmail.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).