linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Cc: andrew.murray@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>, Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>,
	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	james.quinlan@broadcom.com, mbrugger@suse.com,
	phil@raspberrypi.org, jeremy.linton@arm.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] linux/log2.h: Use roundup/dow_pow_two() on 64bit calculations
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:38:45 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191205203845.GA243596@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203114743.1294-9-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

The subject contains a couple typos: it's missing "of" and it's
missing the "n" on "down".

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 12:47:41PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> The function now is safe to use while expecting a 64bit value. Use it
> where relevant.

Please include the function names ("roundup_pow_of_two()",
"rounddown_pow_of_two()") in the changelog so it is self-contained and
doesn't depend on the subject.

> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

With the nits above and below addressed,

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>	# drivers/pci

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c                        | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_clock.c    | 3 ++-
>  drivers/of/device.c                              | 3 ++-
>  drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c | 3 ++-
>  drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.c    | 3 ++-
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c            | 3 ++-
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c        | 5 +++--
>  kernel/dma/direct.c                              | 2 +-
>  8 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <linux/sizes.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
>  
>  #include "pcie-cadence.h"
>  
> @@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ static int cdns_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 fn,
>  	 * roundup_pow_of_two() returns an unsigned long, which is not suited
>  	 * for 64bit values.
>  	 */

Please remove the comment above since it no longer applies.

> -	sz = 1ULL << fls64(sz - 1);
> +	sz = roundup_pow_of_two(sz);
>  	aperture = ilog2(sz) - 7; /* 128B -> 0, 256B -> 1, 512B -> 2, ... */
>  
>  	if ((flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE) == PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO) {
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.c b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.c
> index cd795f6fc1e2..b1689f725b41 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>  // Author: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@free-electrons.com>
>  
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
>  
>  #include "pcie-cadence.h"
>  
> @@ -15,7 +16,7 @@ void cdns_pcie_set_outbound_region(struct cdns_pcie *pcie, u8 fn,
>  	 * roundup_pow_of_two() returns an unsigned long, which is not suited
>  	 * for 64bit values.
>  	 */

Same here.

> -	u64 sz = 1ULL << fls64(size - 1);
> +	u64 sz = roundup_pow_of_two(size);
>  	int nbits = ilog2(sz);
>  	u32 addr0, addr1, desc0, desc1;
>  
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/pci-epf.h>
>  #include <linux/sizes.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
>  
>  #include "pcie-rockchip.h"
>  
> @@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_prog_ep_ob_atu(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip, u8 fn,
>  					 u32 r, u32 type, u64 cpu_addr,
>  					 u64 pci_addr, size_t size)
>  {
> -	u64 sz = 1ULL << fls64(size - 1);
> +	u64 sz = roundup_pow_of_two(size);
>  	int num_pass_bits = ilog2(sz);
>  	u32 addr0, addr1, desc0, desc1;
>  	bool is_nor_msg = (type == AXI_WRAPPER_NOR_MSG);
> @@ -176,7 +177,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 fn,
>  	 * roundup_pow_of_two() returns an unsigned long, which is not suited
>  	 * for 64bit values.
>  	 */

And here.

> -	sz = 1ULL << fls64(sz - 1);
> +	sz = roundup_pow_of_two(sz);
>  	aperture = ilog2(sz) - 7; /* 128B -> 0, 256B -> 1, 512B -> 2, ... */
>  
>  	if ((flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE) == PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO) {
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> index 6af7ae83c4ad..056886c4efec 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ u64 dma_direct_get_required_mask(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	u64 max_dma = phys_to_dma_direct(dev, (max_pfn - 1) << PAGE_SHIFT);
>  
> -	return (1ULL << (fls64(max_dma) - 1)) * 2 - 1;
> +	return rounddown_pow_of_two(max_dma) * 2 - 1;

Personally I would probably make this one a separate patch since it's
qualitatively different than the others and it would avoid the slight
awkwardness of the non-greppable "roundup/down_pow_of_two()"
construction in the commit subject.

But it's fine either way.

>  }
>  
>  static gfp_t __dma_direct_optimal_gfp_mask(struct device *dev, u64 dma_mask,
> -- 
> 2.24.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-05 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-03 11:47 [PATCH v4 0/8] Raspberry Pi 4 PCIe support Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-03 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings for brcmstb's PCIe device Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-03 15:03   ` Andrew Murray
2019-12-03 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] ARM: dts: bcm2711: Enable PCIe controller Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-16  6:46   ` Jian-Hong Pan
2019-12-16  9:49     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-03 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] PCI: brcmstb: Add Broadcom STB PCIe host controller driver Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-03 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] PCI: brcmstb: Add MSI support Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-03 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] MAINTAINERS: Add brcmstb PCIe controller Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-03 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] arm64: defconfig: Enable Broadcom's STB " Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-03 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] linux/log2.h: Fix 64bit calculations in roundup/down_pow_two() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-03 16:39   ` Chuck Lever
2019-12-04 10:56   ` Martin Habets
2019-12-04 14:17   ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-12-05  0:39   ` Lu Baolu
2019-12-05 17:48   ` Robin Murphy
2019-12-12 12:31     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-05 22:30   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-12-12 13:16     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-03 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] linux/log2.h: Use roundup/dow_pow_two() on 64bit calculations Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-03 15:53   ` Rob Herring
2019-12-03 16:06     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-05 20:38   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-12-12 13:21     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191205203845.GA243596@google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eric@anholt.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mbrugger@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=phil@raspberrypi.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
    --cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).