linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
	<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	<sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
	<will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	<eric.auger@redhat.com>, <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add second level of context descriptor table
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:07:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191213170729.00003539@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191209180514.272727-11-jean-philippe@linaro.org>

On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 19:05:11 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:

> The SMMU can support up to 20 bits of SSID. Add a second level of page
> tables to accommodate this. Devices that support more than 1024 SSIDs now
> have a table of 1024 L1 entries (8kB), pointing to tables of 1024 context
> descriptors (64kB), allocated on demand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>

One tiny little comment inline.  I really don't mind if you ignore it ;)

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 143 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index fc5119f34187..52adcdfda58b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@
>  
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT		GENMASK_ULL(5, 4)
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR	0
> +#define STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2	2
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(51, 6)
>  #define STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX		GENMASK_ULL(63, 59)
>  
> @@ -263,7 +264,20 @@
>  
>  #define STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(51, 4)
>  
> -/* Context descriptor (stage-1 only) */
> +/*
> + * Context descriptors.
> + *
> + * Linear: when less than 1024 SSIDs are supported
> + * 2lvl: at most 1024 L1 entries,
> + *       1024 lazy entries per table.
> + */
> +#define CTXDESC_SPLIT			10
> +#define CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES		(1 << CTXDESC_SPLIT)
> +
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS		1
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_VALID		1
> +#define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(51, 12)
> +
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS		8
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_T0SZ		GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
>  #define ARM64_TCR_T0SZ			GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
> @@ -575,7 +589,10 @@ struct arm_smmu_cd_table {
>  };
>  
>  struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg {
> -	struct arm_smmu_cd_table	table;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd_table	*tables;
> +	size_t				num_tables;
> +	__le64				*l1ptr;
> +	dma_addr_t			l1ptr_dma;
>  	struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc	cd;
>  	u8				s1fmt;
>  	u8				s1cdmax;
> @@ -1521,9 +1538,53 @@ static void arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>  {
>  	size_t size = num_entries * (CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS << 3);
>  
> +	if (!table->ptr)
> +		return;
>  	dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, table->ptr, table->ptr_dma);
>  }
>  
> +static void arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(__le64 *dst,
> +				      struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table)
> +{
> +	u64 val = (table->ptr_dma & CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK) |
> +		  CTXDESC_L1_DESC_VALID;
> +
> +	WRITE_ONCE(*dst, cpu_to_le64(val));
> +}
> +
> +static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> +				   u32 ssid)
> +{
> +	__le64 *l1ptr;
> +	unsigned int idx;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table;
> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> +	struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
> +
> +	if (cfg->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR) {
> +		table = &cfg->tables[0];
> +		idx = ssid;
> +	} else {
> +		idx = ssid >> CTXDESC_SPLIT;
> +		if (idx >= cfg->num_tables)
> +			return NULL;
> +
> +		table = &cfg->tables[idx];
> +		if (!table->ptr) {
> +			if (arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, table,
> +							 CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES))
> +				return NULL;
> +
> +			l1ptr = cfg->l1ptr + idx * CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS;
> +			arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(l1ptr, table);
> +			/* An invalid L1CD can be cached */
> +			arm_smmu_sync_cd(smmu_domain, ssid, false);
> +		}
> +		idx = ssid & (CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES - 1);
> +	}
> +	return table->ptr + idx * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> +}
> +
>  static u64 arm_smmu_cpu_tcr_to_cd(u64 tcr)
>  {
>  	u64 val = 0;
> @@ -1556,8 +1617,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>  	u64 val;
>  	bool cd_live;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> -	__le64 *cdptr = smmu_domain->s1_cfg.table.ptr + ssid *
> -			CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> +	__le64 *cdptr = arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(smmu_domain, ssid);
> +
> +	if (!cdptr)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	val = le64_to_cpu(cdptr[0]);
>  	cd_live = !!(val & CTXDESC_CD_0_V);
> @@ -1604,20 +1667,87 @@ static int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>  
>  static int arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +	size_t size = 0;
> +	size_t max_contexts;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>  	struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
>  
> -	cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR;
> -	return arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->table,
> -					    1 << cfg->s1cdmax);
> +	max_contexts = 1 << cfg->s1cdmax;
> +
> +	if (!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_CDTAB) ||
> +	    max_contexts <= CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES) {
> +		cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR;
> +		cfg->num_tables = 1;
> +	} else {
> +		cfg->s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2;
> +		cfg->num_tables = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_contexts,
> +					       CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES);
> +
> +		size = cfg->num_tables * (CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3);
> +		cfg->l1ptr = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, size,
> +						 &cfg->l1ptr_dma,
> +						 GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!cfg->l1ptr) {
> +			dev_warn(smmu->dev,
> +				 "failed to allocate L1 context table\n");
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	cfg->tables = devm_kzalloc(smmu->dev, sizeof(struct arm_smmu_cd_table) *
> +				   cfg->num_tables, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cfg->tables) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_free_l1;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Only allocate a leaf table for linear case. With two levels, leaf
> +	 * tables are allocated lazily.
> +	 */
> +	if (!cfg->l1ptr) {

This might have been the tiniest bit clearer if the check matched the description
by checking it's a linear table rather than what is kind of a side effect of it
not being non linear.

	if (cfg->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR)


> +		ret = arm_smmu_alloc_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->tables[0],
> +						   max_contexts);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto err_free_tables;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_free_tables:
> +	devm_kfree(smmu->dev, cfg->tables);
> +	cfg->tables = NULL;
> +err_free_l1:
> +	if (cfg->l1ptr) {
> +		dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, cfg->l1ptr, cfg->l1ptr_dma);
> +		cfg->l1ptr = NULL;
> +		cfg->l1ptr_dma = 0;
> +	}
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void arm_smmu_free_cd_tables(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain)
>  {
> +	int i;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>  	struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
> +	size_t num_leaf_entries = 1 << cfg->s1cdmax;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd_table *table = cfg->tables;
> +
> +	if (cfg->l1ptr) {
> +		size_t size = cfg->num_tables * (CTXDESC_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3);
>  
> -	arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(smmu, &cfg->table, 1 << cfg->s1cdmax);
> +		dmam_free_coherent(smmu->dev, size, cfg->l1ptr, cfg->l1ptr_dma);
> +		cfg->l1ptr = NULL;
> +		cfg->l1ptr_dma = 0;
> +		num_leaf_entries = CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_tables; i++, table++)
> +		arm_smmu_free_cd_leaf_table(smmu, table, num_leaf_entries);
> +	devm_kfree(smmu->dev, cfg->tables);
> +	cfg->tables = NULL;
>  }
>  
>  /* Stream table manipulation functions */
> @@ -1737,6 +1867,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (s1_cfg) {
> +		dma_addr_t ptr_dma = s1_cfg->l1ptr ? s1_cfg->l1ptr_dma :
> +				     s1_cfg->tables[0].ptr_dma;
> +
>  		BUG_ON(ste_live);
>  		dst[1] = cpu_to_le64(
>  			 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
> @@ -1749,7 +1882,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>  		   !(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE))
>  			dst[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
>  
> -		val |= (s1_cfg->table.ptr_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> +		val |= (ptr_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX, s1_cfg->s1cdmax) |
>  			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT, s1_cfg->s1fmt);
> @@ -2265,7 +2398,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  	if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1) {
>  		struct arm_smmu_s1_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->s1_cfg;
>  
> -		if (cfg->table.ptr) {
> +		if (cfg->tables) {
>  			arm_smmu_free_cd_tables(smmu_domain);
>  			arm_smmu_bitmap_free(smmu->asid_map, cfg->cd.asid);
>  		}



  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-13 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-09 18:05 [PATCH v3 00/13] iommu: Add PASID support to Arm SMMUv3 Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Drop __GFP_ZERO flag from DMA allocation Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-13 16:45   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-12-17 10:59   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] dt-bindings: document PASID property for IOMMU masters Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support platform SSID Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 11:05   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-17 15:21     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 16:46       ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 10:17   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 16:06     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] ACPI/IORT: Support PASID for platform devices Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 13:27   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Prepare arm_smmu_s1_cfg for SSID support Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 13:27   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add context descriptor tables allocators Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 13:36   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for Substream IDs Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 16:43   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 16:07     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 16:59       ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 17:03   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Propate ssid_bits Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 17:07   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 16:08     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 17:00       ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Handle failure of arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc() Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-17 17:24   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add second level of context descriptor table Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-13 17:07   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2019-12-18  9:59   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 16:10     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Improve add_device() error handling Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] PCI/ATS: Add PASID stubs Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-10 21:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-12-18 10:02   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-09 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PCI PASID Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-18 10:17   ` Auger Eric
2019-12-18 16:13     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-12-13 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] iommu: Add PASID support to Arm SMMUv3 Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191213170729.00003539@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).