linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@gmail.com>,
	Karol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>,
	"Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Alexandru Gagniuc <alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Jan Vesely <jano.vesely@gmail.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Austin Bolen <austin_bolen@dell.com>,
	Shyam Iyer <Shyam_Iyer@dell.com>, Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Issues with "PCI/LINK: Report degraded links via link bandwidth notification"
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 05:38:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200204043825.thpbqpz3ao7zqvlh@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_PRQJmG_NYHmqWhv2R1utaNf0LcTVgFA7LMeYr75fy55w@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 04:16:36PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> AMD has had a micro-controller on the GPU handling pcie link speeds
> and widths dynamically (in addition to GPU clocks and voltages) for
> about 12 years or so at this point to save power when the GPU is idle
> and improve performance when it's required.  The micro-controller
> changes the link parameters dynamically based on load independent of
> the driver.  The driver can tweak the heuristics, or even disable the
> dynamic changes, but by default it's enabled when the driver loads.
> The ucode for this micro-controller is loaded by the driver so you'll
> see fixed clocks and widths prior to the driver loading.  We'd need
> some sort of opt out I suppose for periods when the driver has enabled
> dynamic pcie power management in the micro-controller.

Note that there are *two* bits in the Link Status Register:

* Link Autonomous Bandwidth Status
  "This bit is Set by hardware to indicate that hardware has
  autonomously changed Link speed or width, without the Port
  transitioning through DL_Down status, for reasons other than to
  attempt to correct unreliable Link operation.  This bit must be set if
  the Physical Layer reports a speed or width change was initiated by
  the Downstream component that was indicated as an autonomous change."

* Link Bandwidth Management Status
  "This bit is Set by hardware to indicate that either of the
  following has occurred without the Port transitioning through
  DL_Down status. [...] Hardware has changed Link speed or width to
  attempt to correct unreliable Link operation, either through an
  LTSSM timeout or a higher level process."

See PCIe Base Spec 4.0 sec 7.8.8, 7.8.7, 4.2.6.3.3.1.

The two bits generate *separate* interrupts.  We only enable the
interrupt for the latter.

If AMD GPUs generate a Link Bandwidth Management Interrupt upon
autonomously changing bandwidth for power management reasons
(instead of to correct unreliability issues), that would be a
spec violation.

So the question is, do your GPUs violate the spec in this regard?

Thanks,

Lukas

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-04  4:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-15 22:10 Issues with "PCI/LINK: Report degraded links via link bandwidth notification" Bjorn Helgaas
2020-01-16  2:44 ` Alex G
2020-01-18  0:18   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-01-20  2:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-01-20 15:56   ` Alex Williamson
2020-01-20 16:01   ` Alex G.
2020-01-21 11:10     ` Lucas Stach
2020-01-21 14:55       ` Alex G.
2020-02-03  1:56       ` Dave Airlie
2020-02-03  2:04         ` Dave Airlie
2020-02-03  2:07           ` Ben Skeggs
2020-02-03 21:16           ` Alex Deucher
2020-02-04  4:38             ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2020-02-04 14:47               ` Alex Deucher
2020-01-30 16:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-22 16:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-01-28 23:39   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-01-28 23:51     ` Sinan Kaya
2021-01-29  0:07       ` Alex G.
2021-01-29 21:56         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-02-02 19:50           ` Alex G.
2021-02-02 20:16             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-02-02 20:25               ` Alex G.
2021-01-29  1:30     ` Alex Deucher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200204043825.thpbqpz3ao7zqvlh@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=Shyam_Iyer@dell.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com \
    --cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
    --cc=austin_bolen@dell.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jano.vesely@gmail.com \
    --cc=karolherbst@gmail.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
    --cc=okaya@kernel.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=skeggsb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).