linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
	bjorn@helgaas.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] pci: Make return value of pcie_capability_read*() consistent
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:38:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200423223819.GA248903@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80f70efc-0ff6-a53f-9a86-d52e053e6a69@hisilicon.com>

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 07:55:17PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> On 2020/4/19 14:51, Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed wrote:

> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c
> > index 79c4a2ef269a..451f2b8b2b3c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/access.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/access.c
> > @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ int pcie_capability_read_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos, u16 *val)
> 
> Maybe provide some comments for the function, to notify the outside
> users to do the error code conversion.

A short function comment about the set of possible return values
wouldn't hurt.  We don't have those for pci_read_config_word() and
friends, and there are several pcie_capability_*() functions.  I don't
think it's worth repeating the comment for every function, so maybe we
could just extend the existing comment at pcie_capability_read_word().

> BTW, pci_{read, write}_config_*() may also have the issues that
> export the private err code outside. You may want to solve these in
> a series along with this patch.

If you see a specific issue, please point it out.

I looked at pci_read_config_word(), and it can return
PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND, PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER, or the return
value from bus->ops->read().

I looked at all the users of PCIBIOS_*.  There's really no interesting
use of any of them except by pcibios_err_to_errno() and
xen_pcibios_err_to_errno(), so I'm not sure it's even worth keeping
them.

But I think it's probably more work to excise all of them than it is
to simply make pci_read_config_word() and pcie_capability_read_word()
return the same set of error values.  So I think we should do this
first.

> >  	*val = 0;
> >  	if (pos & 1)
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > +		return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;
> >  
> >  	if (pcie_capability_reg_implemented(dev, pos)) {
> >  		ret = pci_read_config_word(dev, pci_pcie_cap(dev) + pos, val);
> > @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ int pcie_capability_read_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos, u32 *val)
> >  
> >  	*val = 0;
> >  	if (pos & 3)
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > +		return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;
> >  
> >  	if (pcie_capability_reg_implemented(dev, pos)) {
> >  		ret = pci_read_config_dword(dev, pci_pcie_cap(dev) + pos, val);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-23 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-19  6:51 [PATCH RFC] pci: Make return value of pcie_capability_read*() consistent Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed
2020-04-23 11:55 ` Yicong Yang
2020-04-23 22:38   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2020-04-24  6:02     ` Saheed Bolarinwa
2020-04-24  9:11       ` Yicong Yang
2020-04-24 15:12         ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200423223819.GA248903@google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@helgaas.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).