From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27168C83007 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 07:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5AF206B8 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 07:35:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588059313; bh=IAwY+0Nh3EkxxXHtSahpYzrED4Rl8r+8ekoqfkVKb/0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=kyurQVSPW7TWn4Yc5T6whgibSKkvD093JjdBK38N1S5LXGLaw+blCjUQehjytE7Ue xbSNc04MAtj6FX6njcwrHp62pJk/RJIHm6rM1F8l3lU/WrJrfcba1uLdS61jSas3Ot tdwv9+6azatE1osKsxjoCMfW4uMOHubbIoggg2zE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726760AbgD1HfI (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 03:35:08 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34258 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726800AbgD1HfF (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 03:35:05 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C72F0206B9; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 07:35:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588059303; bh=IAwY+0Nh3EkxxXHtSahpYzrED4Rl8r+8ekoqfkVKb/0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oZDYROcDt/z2hNKXF24FZRVWFw/iV17GPFpXarq4tvPeCBQyL+ns9y5VzPlfMGqYd s2hp8hQIBz9WYApD+atCrE3vYXR1rMcyjn05BNKspBQn72xPop6y115/ZPZkEKMGQn 50YnTSqionB3NEYZKPwRCPjHicWPXB+inBFdAC+8= Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:34:58 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Dave Jiang Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, megha.dey@linux.intel.com, maz@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, rafael@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, jgg@mellanox.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, baolu.lu@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, jing.lin@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, parav@mellanox.com, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/15] drivers/base: Introduce platform_msi_ops Message-ID: <20200428073458.GB994208@kroah.com> References: <158751095889.36773.6009825070990637468.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com> <158751203294.36773.11436842117908325764.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com> <20200426070118.GA2083720@kroah.com> <4223511b-8dc0-33d1-6af1-831d8bf40b3d@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4223511b-8dc0-33d1-6af1-831d8bf40b3d@intel.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 02:38:12PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: > > > On 4/26/2020 12:01 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:33:53PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: > > > From: Megha Dey > > > > > > This is a preparatory patch to introduce Interrupt Message Store (IMS). > > > > > > Until now, platform-msi.c provided a generic way to handle non-PCI MSI > > > interrupts. Platform-msi uses its parent chip's mask/unmask routines > > > and only provides a way to write the message in the generating device. > > > > > > Newly creeping non-PCI complaint MSI-like interrupts (Intel's IMS for > > > instance) might need to provide a device specific mask and unmask callback > > > as well, apart from the write function. > > > > > > Hence, introduce a new structure platform_msi_ops, which would provide > > > device specific write function as well as other device specific callbacks > > > (mask/unmask). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Megha Dey > > > > As this is not following the Intel-specific rules for sending me new > > code, I am just deleting it all from my inbox. > > That is my fault. As the aggregator of the patches, I should've signed off > Megha's patches. That is NOT the Intel-specific rules I am talking about. Please go work with the "Linux group" at Intel to find out what I am referring to, they know what I mean. The not-signing-off is just a normal kernel community rule, everyone has to follow that. greg k-h