linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
	bjorn@helgaas.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/11 RFC] PCI/ASPM: Use error return value from pcie_capability_read_*()
Date: Mon,  6 Jul 2020 11:31:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200706093121.9731-11-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200706093121.9731-1-refactormyself@gmail.com>

From: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>

On failure pcie_capability_read_dword() sets it's last parameter,
val to 0.
However, with Patch 11/11, it is possible that val is set to ~0 on
failure. This would introduce a bug because (x & x) == (~0 & x).

This bug can be avoided if the return value of pcie_capability_read_dword
is checked to confirm success.

Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_dword() to ensure success.

Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn@helgaas.com>
Signed-off-by: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
index b17e5ffd31b1..32aa9d57672a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static void pcie_set_clkpm(struct pcie_link_state *link, int enable)
 
 static void pcie_clkpm_cap_init(struct pcie_link_state *link, int blacklist)
 {
-	int capable = 1, enabled = 1;
+	int ret, capable = 1, enabled = 1;
 	u32 reg32;
 	u16 reg16;
 	struct pci_dev *child;
@@ -184,14 +184,14 @@ static void pcie_clkpm_cap_init(struct pcie_link_state *link, int blacklist)
 
 	/* All functions should have the same cap and state, take the worst */
 	list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list) {
-		pcie_capability_read_dword(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &reg32);
-		if (!(reg32 & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_CLKPM)) {
+		ret = pcie_capability_read_dword(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &reg32);
+		if (ret || !(reg32 & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_CLKPM)) {
 			capable = 0;
 			enabled = 0;
 			break;
 		}
-		pcie_capability_read_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &reg16);
-		if (!(reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CLKREQ_EN))
+		ret = pcie_capability_read_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &reg16);
+		if (ret || !(reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CLKREQ_EN))
 			enabled = 0;
 	}
 	link->clkpm_enabled = enabled;
@@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ static bool pcie_retrain_link(struct pcie_link_state *link)
 	struct pci_dev *parent = link->pdev;
 	unsigned long end_jiffies;
 	u16 reg16;
+	int ret;
 
 	pcie_capability_read_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &reg16);
 	reg16 |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL;
@@ -222,8 +223,8 @@ static bool pcie_retrain_link(struct pcie_link_state *link)
 	/* Wait for link training end. Break out after waiting for timeout */
 	end_jiffies = jiffies + LINK_RETRAIN_TIMEOUT;
 	do {
-		pcie_capability_read_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &reg16);
-		if (!(reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LT))
+		ret = pcie_capability_read_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &reg16);
+		if (ret || !(reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LT))
 			break;
 		msleep(1);
 	} while (time_before(jiffies, end_jiffies));
@@ -237,7 +238,7 @@ static bool pcie_retrain_link(struct pcie_link_state *link)
  */
 static void pcie_aspm_configure_common_clock(struct pcie_link_state *link)
 {
-	int same_clock = 1;
+	int ret, same_clock = 1;
 	u16 reg16, parent_reg, child_reg[8];
 	struct pci_dev *child, *parent = link->pdev;
 	struct pci_bus *linkbus = parent->subordinate;
@@ -249,24 +250,24 @@ static void pcie_aspm_configure_common_clock(struct pcie_link_state *link)
 	BUG_ON(!pci_is_pcie(child));
 
 	/* Check downstream component if bit Slot Clock Configuration is 1 */
-	pcie_capability_read_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &reg16);
-	if (!(reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_SLC))
+	ret = pcie_capability_read_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &reg16);
+	if (ret || !(reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_SLC))
 		same_clock = 0;
 
 	/* Check upstream component if bit Slot Clock Configuration is 1 */
-	pcie_capability_read_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &reg16);
-	if (!(reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_SLC))
+	ret = pcie_capability_read_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &reg16);
+	if (ret || !(reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_SLC))
 		same_clock = 0;
 
 	/* Port might be already in common clock mode */
-	pcie_capability_read_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &reg16);
-	if (same_clock && (reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC)) {
+	ret = pcie_capability_read_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &reg16);
+	if (!ret && same_clock && (reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC)) {
 		bool consistent = true;
 
 		list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list) {
-			pcie_capability_read_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL,
+			ret = pcie_capability_read_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL,
 						  &reg16);
-			if (!(reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC)) {
+			if (ret || !(reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC)) {
 				consistent = false;
 				break;
 			}
-- 
2.18.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-06 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200706093121.9731-1-refactormyself@gmail.com>
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 3/11 RFC] PCI: pciehp: Validate with the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 4/11 " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 5/11 RFC] PCI: pciehp: Make "Power On" the default Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-10  0:14   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-07-10 21:42     ` Saheed Bolarinwa
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 7/11 RFC] PCI: Validate with the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-06  9:31 ` [PATCH 8/11 RFC] PCI/PM: Use error return value from pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa
2020-07-06  9:31 ` Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa [this message]
2020-07-10  0:11 ` [PATCH 0/11 RFC] PCI: Remove "*val = 0" " Bjorn Helgaas
2020-07-10 21:32   ` Saheed Bolarinwa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200706093121.9731-11-refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --to=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn@helgaas.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).