linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>,
	jroedel@suse.de, Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Randy Wright <rwright@hpe.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Khalid Aziz <khalid@gonehiking.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI, kdump: Clear bus master bit upon shutdown in kdump kernel
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 15:50:48 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200722215048.GL220876@anatevka.americas.hpqcorp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200722152123.GA1278089@bjorn-Precision-5520>

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:21:23AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:52:26PM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 5:38 PM Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On 03/04/20 at 08:53pm, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 7:53 PM Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 03/03/20 at 01:01pm, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > > > > > I looked at this some more. Looks like we do not clear irqs
> > > > > > when we do a kexec reboot. And, the bootup code maintains
> > > > > > the same table for the kexec-ed kernel. I'm looking at the
> > > > > > following code in
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess you are talking about kdump reboot here, right? Kexec
> > > > > and kdump boot take the similar mechanism, but differ a
> > > > > little.
> > > >
> > > > Right I meant kdump kernel here. And, clearly the
> > > > is_kdump_kernel() case below.
> > > >
> > > > > > intel_irq_remapping.c:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >         if (ir_pre_enabled(iommu)) {
> > > > > >                 if (!is_kdump_kernel()) {
> > > > > >                         pr_warn("IRQ remapping was enabled on %s but
> > > > > > we are not in kdump mode\n",
> > > > > >                                 iommu->name);
> > > > > >                         clear_ir_pre_enabled(iommu);
> > > > > >                         iommu_disable_irq_remapping(iommu);
> > > > > >                 } else if (iommu_load_old_irte(iommu))
> > > > >
> > > > > Here, it's for kdump kernel to copy old ir table from 1st kernel.
> > > >
> > > > Correct.
> > > >
> > > > > >                         pr_err("Failed to copy IR table for %s from
> > > > > > previous kernel\n",
> > > > > >                                iommu->name);
> > > > > >                 else
> > > > > >                         pr_info("Copied IR table for %s from previous kernel\n",
> > > > > >                                 iommu->name);
> > > > > >         }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Would cleaning the interrupts(like in the non kdump path
> > > > > > above) just before shutdown help here? This should clear the
> > > > > > interrupts enabled for all the devices in the current
> > > > > > kernel. So when kdump kernel starts, it starts clean. This
> > > > > > should probably help block out the interrupts from a device
> > > > > > that does not have a driver.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think stopping those devices out of control from continue
> > > > > sending interrupts is a good idea. While not sure if only
> > > > > clearing the interrupt will be enough. Those devices which
> > > > > will be initialized by their driver will brake, but devices
> > > > > which drivers are not loaded into kdump kernel may continue
> > > > > acting. Even though interrupts are cleaning at this time, the
> > > > > on-flight DMA could continue triggerring interrupt since the
> > > > > ir table and iopage table are rebuilt.
> > > >
> > > > This should be handled by the IOMMU, right? And, hence you are
> > > > getting UR. This seems like the correct execution flow to me.
> > >
> > > Sorry for late reply.
> > > Yes, this is initializing IOMMU device.
> > >
> > > > Anyway, you could just test this theory by removing the
> > > > is_kdump_kernel() check above and see if it solves your problem.
> > > > Obviously, check the VT-d spec to figure out the exact sequence to
> > > > turn off the IR.
> > >
> > > OK, I will talk to Kairui and get a machine to test it. Thanks for your
> > > nice idea, if you have a draft patch, we are happy to test it.
> > >
> > > > Note that the device that is causing the problem here is a legit
> > > > device. We want to have interrupts from devices we don't know about
> > > > blocked anyway because we can have compromised firmware/ devices that
> > > > could cause a DoS attack. So blocking the unwanted interrupts seems
> > > > like the right thing to do here.
> > >
> > > Kairui said it's a device which driver is not loaded in kdump kernel
> > > because it's not needed by kdump. We try to only load kernel modules
> > > which are needed, e.g one device is the dump target, its driver has to
> > > be loaded in. In this case, the device is more like a out of control
> > > device to kdump kernel.
> > 
> > Hi Bao, Deepa, sorry for this very late response. The test machine was
> > not available for sometime, and I restarted to work on this problem.
> > 
> > For the workaround mention by Deepa (by remote the is_kdump_kernel()
> > check), it didn't work, the machine still hangs upon shutdown.
> > The devices that were left in an unknown state and sending interrupt
> > could be a problem, but it's irrelevant to this hanging problem.
> > 
> > I think I didn't make one thing clear, The PCI UR error never arrives
> > in kernel, it's the iLo BMC on that HPE machine caught the error, and
> > send kernel an NMI. kernel is panicked by NMI, I'm still trying to
> > figure out why the NMI hanged kernel, even with panic=-1,
> > panic_on_io_nmi, panic_on_unknown_nmi all set. But if we can avoid the
> > NMI by shutdown the devices in right order, that's also a solution.
> 
> I'm not sure how much sympathy to have for this situation.  A PCIe UR
> is fatal for the transaction and maybe even the device, but from the
> overall system point of view, it *should* be a recoverable error and
> we shouldn't panic.
> 
> Errors like that should be reported via the normal AER or ACPI/APEI
> mechanisms.  It sounds like in this case, the platform has decided
> these aren't enough and it is trying to force a reboot?  If this is
> "special" platform behavior, I'm not sure how much we need to cater
> for it.
> 

Are these AER errors the type processed by the GHES code?

I'll note that RedHat runs their crash kernel with:  hest_disable.
So, the ghes code is disabled in the crash kernel.


-- 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Hoemann                  Software Engineer   Hewlett Packard Enterprise
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-22 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-25 19:21 [RFC PATCH] PCI, kdump: Clear bus master bit upon shutdown in kdump kernel Kairui Song
2020-01-03  7:58 ` Kairui Song
2020-01-10 21:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-01-10 22:25   ` Khalid Aziz and Shuah Khan
2020-01-10 23:00     ` Jerry Hoemann
2020-01-11  0:18       ` Khalid Aziz
2020-01-11  0:50         ` Baoquan He
2020-01-11  3:45           ` Khalid Aziz
2020-01-11  9:35             ` Kairui Song
2020-01-11 18:32               ` Deepa Dinamani
2020-01-13 17:07                 ` Kairui Song
2020-01-15  1:16                   ` Deepa Dinamani
2020-01-15  7:56                     ` Kairui Song
2020-01-15 17:30                   ` Khalid Aziz
2020-01-15 18:05                     ` Kairui Song
2020-01-15 21:17                       ` Khalid Aziz
2020-01-17  3:24                         ` Dave Young
2020-01-17  3:46                           ` Baoquan He
2020-01-17 15:44                           ` Khalid Aziz
2020-01-11 10:04             ` Baoquan He
2020-01-11  0:45       ` Baoquan He
2020-01-11  0:51         ` Baoquan He
2020-01-11  1:46         ` Baoquan He
2020-01-11  9:24         ` Kairui Song
2020-01-10 23:36   ` Jerry Hoemann
2020-01-11  8:46   ` Kairui Song
2020-02-22 16:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-02-24  4:56   ` Dave Young
2020-02-24 17:30   ` Kairui Song
2020-02-28 19:53     ` Deepa Dinamani
2020-03-03 21:01       ` Deepa Dinamani
2020-03-05  3:53         ` Baoquan He
2020-03-05  4:53           ` Deepa Dinamani
2020-03-05  6:06             ` Deepa Dinamani
2020-03-06  9:38             ` Baoquan He
2020-07-22 14:52               ` Kairui Song
2020-07-22 15:21                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-07-22 21:50                   ` Jerry Hoemann [this message]
2020-07-23  0:00                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-07-23 18:34                       ` Kairui Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200722215048.GL220876@anatevka.americas.hpqcorp.net \
    --to=jerry.hoemann@hpe.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kasong@redhat.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=khalid@gonehiking.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
    --cc=rwright@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).