From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1938C43467 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 20:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A335B2227E for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 20:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="KqYQl09n" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390883AbgJIUuw (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:50:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56440 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727311AbgJIUuu (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:50:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x441.google.com (mail-pf1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::441]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BED68C0613D5 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 13:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x441.google.com with SMTP id a200so7839515pfa.10 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 13:50:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=wTcVu4oETJELTBTO9Qx9E6QynJ2qRr0RMhI6Lss/kRo=; b=KqYQl09nzQc++fy4ixa3glsFIZci442nzrDG0fcwmUtpLC5GdJDecIntJaTr9BnU+k mHQV/FbLDSsp3LtFLsRl7T/zeVjv8Twr5lMP3mtNmGjMAycuhVQeNy6SxCfwNFW224a7 0aTYXNZMa+jC7UhkQneYNe71rwlQlYDitPklTa97BhEb1m7+mN8rfc5c/j9aVJULK1tK kXqyUbQ8e7mPIF4Q1d2YHCkekuQkecmqoGoo0ONdt2lmrDHm6ydQldiw4prAm7vbUqOP n+GwBtayqaO7D2OKGp8MP+pmirMixqou37jYYe5EkC/YvLWRQkL0zC9bekBaZ8qVYuhi m9ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=wTcVu4oETJELTBTO9Qx9E6QynJ2qRr0RMhI6Lss/kRo=; b=rAfXLFsBdEmZuShd9frRJW0K9mk/LSeLSRqSZMRIPuiaGUeqQn2+D7zxafCpbO/de8 Z/AOItk7OpaDSe2DlT52mcENurbgnrvLvQYnr4Bgr8kaJDtKXuIl6lDKWtMkJkf7FaKu Dv+WdCKkypbDE07YWVfafsH9JnslFt0VRj4JHuEipqF0CRDGcuGzLNhM9owbXVTGg97n dJA64xBlgR17stWXOE9+RjVZJqn4kWn8quiNb8/rAzenBSRIcP0ZNyBXJmgYn61nGdGl oAkDInswY6LgAkQtoM5yZZxuPHSPl4VWua1Ph+LYKnSbqY4AKO9Rqyrz6ptXrYFohI+P UnRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533G3zvAvvtDnlQKC4KWcKU84BYa0EjqAxG1YyiFVAJdJtliyrXl gaHGOjWRteWMpUz8xSswUAylzw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVwMwto7ILPuyT8ZZD/+7fv8lOOoXOE+RyXcVgFRqpvoLioQmgYU/5kPeWbujatJFVPXtviQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:19c9:: with SMTP id nm9mr6551747pjb.6.1602276647984; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 13:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:201:2:f693:9fff:fef4:1b6d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n4sm10981225pgv.89.2020.10.09.13.50.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 09 Oct 2020 13:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 13:50:41 -0700 From: Sami Tolvanen To: Sedat Dilek Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Will Deacon , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Paul E. McKenney" , Kees Cook , Nick Desaulniers , Clang-Built-Linux ML , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/29] Add support for Clang LTO Message-ID: <20201009205041.GA1448445@google.com> References: <20201009161338.657380-1-samitolvanen@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 06:30:24PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Will clang-cfi be based on this, too? At least until the prerequisite patches are merged into mainline. In the meanwhile, I have a CFI tree based on this series here: https://github.com/samitolvanen/linux/tree/tip/clang-lto Sami