From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0539C55179 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:41:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AA82464E for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:41:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603471312; bh=pdGOLPH8w5KMPQiTKHRb/nJ9/Rcx9+HIT3IKvIaziD0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=TyuDw9EV/aPztFhZgrNAKs0hY3u3LuPJ3E5NY4jKgJaqaeRpdZNRtaeroYgxU5arM i7lTq4RTvEo7RBmhKq0O1ATKHBOgnlMXrQ4tfCrcd0c553Y27H17A1aUdTCi86VDgX 0lrfkgrnIbbb42uRBA3SZ6skWi9kO3k5CNZwZqJk= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751857AbgJWQlv (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:41:51 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com ([209.85.210.67]:39950 "EHLO mail-ot1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751848AbgJWQlv (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:41:51 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id f97so1934244otb.7; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:41:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=FEBJaWN8Esn19Hc7kbCS8B998syb6EN/9qSrNFekzF0=; b=S/iQ9FRiTZaCHty0Lbzf1C2Wu2a81tTmq/i6MtNALJ7s5mlC8Y8ljhKs8aAw8cxiX0 GIKwUXZdV4bH/abmjVDjlz2Ebejv+OJXL/ptU9DEW9xMqdZxlhhcCj603uxLmkKCLMDv WIXrU7u8NLMekLw5naQ/vXyUwrZz1BXI65zQgOZ3THCGbcFcF4CxX8Q7waYZ6QJQyDF8 b8MaedhviwfOPZy3Ti+G5oRxwkgOSOGOAzJtDO2G08ldeAut5kg0PsbLt0gmEbcaKZGH y1VBXCfivUcOc4T9uUSXBJZt5bp+AGEH8uorF099bUwO74YcLVDT0PJHsnUK6P9014j9 KxRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530h2ga4Mqv6UTzyHMi8fZcKCbkLWZ+sJiUBwKSmLtPWLEre0jJ8 LSj6E5KMWA3rFPy3bwHZcQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOlQ5BemqD1h51zUQ8stg0lloHHrLoVNEyEjVZpe7nk74BYwZBKEP/2bFMd6EjjW+6UrZvng== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:140b:: with SMTP id v11mr2420250otp.92.1603471310494; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps15 (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h3sm473420oom.18.2020.10.23.09.41.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 2840151 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:41:48 -0000 Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:41:48 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: daire.mcnamara@microchip.com Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 2/3] dt-bindings: PCI: microchip: Add Microchip PolarFire host binding Message-ID: <20201023164148.GA2839812@bogus> References: <20201022132223.17789-1-daire.mcnamara@microchip.com> <20201022132223.17789-3-daire.mcnamara@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201022132223.17789-3-daire.mcnamara@microchip.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:22:22 +0100, daire.mcnamara@microchip.com wrote: > From: Daire McNamara > > Add device tree bindings for the Microchip PolarFire PCIe controller > when configured in host (Root Complex) mode. > > Signed-off-by: Daire McNamara > --- > .../bindings/pci/microchip,pcie-host.yaml | 93 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/microchip,pcie-host.yaml > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.