Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] Change vring space from nomal memory to dma coherent memory

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 06:05:28AM +0000, Sherry Sun wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] Change vring space from nomal memory to dma
> > coherent memory
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:03:03AM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote:
> > > Changes in V5:
> > > 1. Reorganize the vop_mmap function code in patch 1, which is done by
> > Christoph.
> > > 2. Completely remove the unnecessary code related to reassign the used
> > > ring for card in patch 2.
> > >
> > > The original vop driver only supports dma coherent device, as it
> > > allocates and maps vring by _get_free_pages and dma_map_single, but
> > > not use dma_sync_single_for_cpu/device to sync the updates of
> > > device_page/vring between EP and RC, which will cause memory
> > > synchronization problem for device don't support hardware dma coherent.
> > >
> > > And allocate vrings use dma_alloc_coherent is a common way in kernel,
> > > as the memory interacted between two systems should use consistent
> > > memory to avoid caching effects. So here add noncoherent platform
> > support for vop driver.
> > > Also add some related dma changes to make sure noncoherent platform
> > > works well.
> > >
> > > Sherry Sun (2):
> > >   misc: vop: change the way of allocating vrings and device page
> > >   misc: vop: do not allocate and reassign the used ring
> > >
> > >  drivers/misc/mic/bus/vop_bus.h     |   2 +
> > >  drivers/misc/mic/host/mic_boot.c   |   9 ++
> > >  drivers/misc/mic/host/mic_main.c   |  43 ++------
> > >  drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_debugfs.c |   4 -
> > >  drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_main.c    |  70 +-----------
> > >  drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_vringh.c  | 166 ++++++++++-------------------
> > >  include/uapi/linux/mic_common.h    |   9 +-
> > >  7 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 218 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Have you all seen:
> > 	https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
> > 2Flore.kernel.org%2Fr%2F8c1443136563de34699d2c084df478181c205db4.16
> > 03854416.git.sudeep.dutt%40intel.com&data=04%7C01%7Csherry.sun%
> > 40nxp.com%7Cc19c987667434969847e08d87b0685e8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6f
> > a92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637394615238940323%7CUnknown%7CTW
> > FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJX
> > VCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Zq%2FtHWTq%2BuIVBYXFGoeBmq0JJzYd
> > 9zDyv4NVN4TpC%2FU%3D&reserved=0
> > 
> > Looks like this code is asking to just be deleted, is that ok with you?
> 
> Yes, I saw that patch. I'm ok with it.

Great, can you please provide a "Reviewed-by:" or "Acked-by:" for it?

thanks,

greg k-h