linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
	xerces.zhao@gmail.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
	ashok.raj@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@intel.com, qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 12/15] PCI/RCEC: Add RCiEP's linked RCEC to AER/ERR
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:44:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201202234425.GA1486740@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201121001036.8560-13-sean.v.kelley@intel.com>

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 04:10:33PM -0800, Sean V Kelley wrote:
> From: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
> 
> When attempting error recovery for an RCiEP associated with an RCEC device,
> there needs to be a way to update the Root Error Status, the Uncorrectable
> Error Status and the Uncorrectable Error Severity of the parent RCEC.  In
> some non-native cases in which there is no OS-visible device associated
> with the RCiEP, there is nothing to act upon as the firmware is acting
> before the OS.
> 
> Add handling for the linked RCEC in AER/ERR while taking into account
> non-native cases.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201002184735.1229220-12-seanvk.dev@oregontracks.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 20 +++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index 0ba0b47ae751..51389a6ee4ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -1358,29 +1358,51 @@ static int aer_probe(struct pcie_device *dev)
>   */
>  static pci_ers_result_t aer_root_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
> -	int aer = dev->aer_cap;
> +	int type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
> +	struct pci_dev *root;
> +	int aer = 0;
> +	int rc = 0;
>  	u32 reg32;
> -	int rc;
>  
> -	if (pcie_aer_is_native(dev)) {
> +	if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END)
> +		/*
> +		 * The reset should only clear the Root Error Status
> +		 * of the RCEC. Only perform this for the
> +		 * native case, i.e., an RCEC is present.
> +		 */
> +		root = dev->rcec;
> +	else
> +		root = dev;
> +
> +	if (root)
> +		aer = dev->aer_cap;
> +
> +	if ((aer) && pcie_aer_is_native(dev)) {
>  		/* Disable Root's interrupt in response to error messages */
> -		pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, &reg32);
> +		pci_read_config_dword(root, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, &reg32);
>  		reg32 &= ~ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK;
> -		pci_write_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, reg32);
> +		pci_write_config_dword(root, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, reg32);
>  	}
>  
> -	rc = pci_bus_error_reset(dev);
> -	pci_info(dev, "Root Port link has been reset (%d)\n", rc);
> +	if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC || type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) {
> +		if (pcie_has_flr(dev)) {
> +			rc = pcie_flr(dev);
> +			pci_info(dev, "has been reset (%d)\n", rc);

Maybe:

  +             } else {
  +                     rc = -ENOTTY;
  +                     pci_info(dev, "not reset (no FLR support)\n");

Or do we want to pretend the device was reset and return
PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED?

> +	} else {
> +		rc = pci_bus_error_reset(dev);
> +		pci_info(dev, "Root Port link has been reset (%d)\n", rc);
> +	}
>  
> -	if (pcie_aer_is_native(dev)) {
> +	if ((aer) && pcie_aer_is_native(dev)) {
>  		/* Clear Root Error Status */
> -		pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, &reg32);
> -		pci_write_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, reg32);
> +		pci_read_config_dword(root, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, &reg32);
> +		pci_write_config_dword(root, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, reg32);
>  
>  		/* Enable Root Port's interrupt in response to error messages */
> -		pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, &reg32);
> +		pci_read_config_dword(root, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, &reg32);
>  		reg32 |= ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK;
> -		pci_write_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, reg32);
> +		pci_write_config_dword(root, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, reg32);
>  	}
>  
>  	return rc ? PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT : PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> index 7883c9791562..cbc5abfe767b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> @@ -148,10 +148,10 @@ static int report_resume(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data)
>  
>  /**
>   * pci_walk_bridge - walk bridges potentially AER affected
> - * @bridge:	bridge which may be a Port, an RCEC with associated RCiEPs,
> - *		or an RCiEP associated with an RCEC
> - * @cb:		callback to be called for each device found
> - * @userdata:	arbitrary pointer to be passed to callback
> + * @bridge   bridge which may be an RCEC with associated RCiEPs,
> + *           or a Port.
> + * @cb       callback to be called for each device found
> + * @userdata arbitrary pointer to be passed to callback.
>   *
>   * If the device provided is a bridge, walk the subordinate bus, including
>   * any bridged devices on buses under this bus.  Call the provided callback
> @@ -164,8 +164,14 @@ static void pci_walk_bridge(struct pci_dev *bridge,
>  			    int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *),
>  			    void *userdata)
>  {
> +	/*
> +	 * In a non-native case where there is no OS-visible reporting
> +	 * device the bridge will be NULL, i.e., no RCEC, no Downstream Port.

I don't quite understand this comment.  I see that in the non-native
case, the reporting device may not be OS-visible.  But I don't
understand why the comment is *here*.

If "bridge" can be NULL here, we should test that before dereferencing
"bridge->subordinate".

>  	if (bridge->subordinate)
>  		pci_walk_bus(bridge->subordinate, cb, userdata);
> +	else if (bridge->rcec)
> +		cb(bridge->rcec, userdata);

And I don't understand what's going on here.  In this case, I *think*
"bridge" is an RCiEP and "bridge->rcec" is the related RCEC, so it
looks like we'll call report_frozen_detected(), report_mmio_enabled(),
etc for the RCEC driver.  I would think we'd want the RCiEP driver.

Sorry if I'm missing the obvious.

>  	else
>  		cb(bridge, userdata);
>  }
> @@ -194,12 +200,6 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
>  	pci_dbg(bridge, "broadcast error_detected message\n");
>  	if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {
>  		pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_frozen_detected, &status);
> -		if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) {
> -			pci_warn(dev, "subordinate device reset not possible for RCiEP\n");
> -			status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
> -			goto failed;
> -		}
> -
>  		status = reset_subordinates(bridge);
>  		if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
>  			pci_warn(bridge, "subordinate device reset failed\n");
> -- 
> 2.29.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-02 23:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-21  0:10 [PATCH v12 00/15] Add RCEC handling to PCI/AER Sean V Kelley
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 01/15] AER: aer_root_reset() non-native handling Sean V Kelley
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 02/15] PCI/RCEC: Bind RCEC devices to the Root Port driver Sean V Kelley
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 03/15] PCI/RCEC: Cache RCEC capabilities in pci_init_capabilities() Sean V Kelley
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 04/15] PCI/ERR: Rename reset_link() to reset_subordinates() Sean V Kelley
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 05/15] PCI/ERR: Simplify by using pci_upstream_bridge() Sean V Kelley
2020-12-03 18:45   ` Kelley, Sean V
2020-12-03 22:25     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 06/15] PCI/ERR: Simplify by computing pci_pcie_type() once Sean V Kelley
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 07/15] PCI/ERR: Use "bridge" for clarity in pcie_do_recovery() Sean V Kelley
2020-12-02 23:18   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 08/15] PCI/ERR: Avoid negated conditional for clarity Sean V Kelley
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 09/15] PCI/ERR: Add pci_walk_bridge() to pcie_do_recovery() Sean V Kelley
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 10/15] PCI/ERR: Limit AER resets in pcie_do_recovery() Sean V Kelley
2020-11-23 23:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-23 23:57     ` Kelley, Sean V
2020-11-24 17:17       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-30 19:54         ` Kelley, Sean V
2020-12-01  0:25           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-12-01  1:09             ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-12-01  1:13             ` Kelley, Sean V
2020-12-02 20:53             ` Kelley, Sean V
2020-12-02 21:27               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-12-02 22:54                 ` Kelley, Sean V
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 11/15] PCI/RCEC: Add pcie_link_rcec() to associate RCiEPs Sean V Kelley
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 12/15] PCI/RCEC: Add RCiEP's linked RCEC to AER/ERR Sean V Kelley
2020-12-02 23:44   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2020-12-03  0:51     ` Kelley, Sean V
2020-12-04  0:01       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-12-04 17:17         ` Kelley, Sean V
2020-12-04 17:24           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-12-05 21:30           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-12-07 17:23             ` Kelley, Sean V
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 13/15] PCI/AER: Add pcie_walk_rcec() to RCEC AER handling Sean V Kelley
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 14/15] PCI/PME: Add pcie_walk_rcec() to RCEC PME handling Sean V Kelley
2020-11-21  0:10 ` [PATCH v12 15/15] PCI/AER: Add RCEC AER error injection support Sean V Kelley
2020-11-21  4:26 ` [PATCH v12 00/15] Add RCEC handling to PCI/AER Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201202234425.GA1486740@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@intel.com \
    --cc=sean.v.kelley@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=xerces.zhao@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v12 12/15] PCI/RCEC: Add RCiEP'\''s linked RCEC to AER/ERR' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).