[PATCH v5 0/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller

[PATCH v5 0/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller

[Jim Quinlan]

v5 -- Improved (I hope) commit description (Bjorn).
   -- Rnamed error labels (Krzyszt).
   -- Fixed typos.

v4 -- does not rely on a pending commit, unlike v3.

v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function
      reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied
      to reset/next.
   -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller
      to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert.

v2 -- refactor rescal-reset driver to implement assert/deassert rather than
      reset because the reset call only fires once per lifetime and we need
      to reset after every resume from S2 or S3.
   -- Split the use of "ahci" and "rescal" controllers in separate fields
      to keep things simple.

v1 -- original

Jim Quinlan (2):
  ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller
  PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert

 drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c               | 46 +++++++++++++--------------
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 19 +++++++----
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH v5 1/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller

[Jim Quinlan]

This driver may use one of two resets controllers.  Keep them in separate
variables to keep things simple.  The reset controller "rescal" is shared
between the AHCI driver and the PCIe driver for the BrcmSTB 7216 chip.  Use
devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared() to handle this sharing.

Fixes: 272ecd60a636 ("ata: ahci_brcm: BCM7216 reset is self de-asserting")
Fixes: c345ec6a50e9 ("ata: ahci_brcm: Support BCM7216 reset controller name")
Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c
index 5b32df5d33ad..6e9c5ade4c2e 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c
@@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ struct brcm_ahci_priv {
 	u32 port_mask;
 	u32 quirks;
 	enum brcm_ahci_version version;
-	struct reset_control *rcdev;
+	struct reset_control *rcdev_rescal;
+	struct reset_control *rcdev_ahci;
 };
 
 static inline u32 brcm_sata_readreg(void __iomem *addr)
@@ -352,8 +353,8 @@ static int brcm_ahci_suspend(struct device *dev)
 	else
 		ret = 0;
 
-	if (priv->version != BRCM_SATA_BCM7216)
-		reset_control_assert(priv->rcdev);
+	reset_control_assert(priv->rcdev_ahci);
+	reset_control_rearm(priv->rcdev_rescal);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -365,10 +366,10 @@ static int __maybe_unused brcm_ahci_resume(struct device *dev)
 	struct brcm_ahci_priv *priv = hpriv->plat_data;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (priv->version == BRCM_SATA_BCM7216)
-		ret = reset_control_reset(priv->rcdev);
-	else
-		ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->rcdev);
+	ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->rcdev_ahci);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = reset_control_reset(priv->rcdev_rescal);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -434,7 +435,6 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	const char *reset_name = NULL;
 	struct brcm_ahci_priv *priv;
 	struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv;
 	struct resource *res;
@@ -456,15 +456,15 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (IS_ERR(priv->top_ctrl))
 		return PTR_ERR(priv->top_ctrl);
 
-	/* Reset is optional depending on platform and named differently */
-	if (priv->version == BRCM_SATA_BCM7216)
-		reset_name = "rescal";
-	else
-		reset_name = "ahci";
-
-	priv->rcdev = devm_reset_control_get_optional(&pdev->dev, reset_name);
-	if (IS_ERR(priv->rcdev))
-		return PTR_ERR(priv->rcdev);
+	if (priv->version == BRCM_SATA_BCM7216) {
+		priv->rcdev_rescal = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(
+			&pdev->dev, "rescal");
+		if (IS_ERR(priv->rcdev_rescal))
+			return PTR_ERR(priv->rcdev_rescal);
+	}
+	priv->rcdev_ahci = devm_reset_control_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "ahci");
+	if (IS_ERR(priv->rcdev_ahci))
+		return PTR_ERR(priv->rcdev_ahci);
 
 	hpriv = ahci_platform_get_resources(pdev, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(hpriv))
@@ -485,10 +485,10 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	if (priv->version == BRCM_SATA_BCM7216)
-		ret = reset_control_reset(priv->rcdev);
-	else
-		ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->rcdev);
+	ret = reset_control_reset(priv->rcdev_rescal);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->rcdev_ahci);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -539,8 +539,8 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 out_disable_clks:
 	ahci_platform_disable_clks(hpriv);
 out_reset:
-	if (priv->version != BRCM_SATA_BCM7216)
-		reset_control_assert(priv->rcdev);
+	reset_control_assert(priv->rcdev_ahci);
+	reset_control_rearm(priv->rcdev_rescal);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:45:54PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> This driver may use one of two resets controllers.  Keep them in separate
> variables to keep things simple.  The reset controller "rescal" is shared
> between the AHCI driver and the PCIe driver for the BrcmSTB 7216 chip.  Use
> devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared() to handle this sharing.
> 
> Fixes: 272ecd60a636 ("ata: ahci_brcm: BCM7216 reset is self de-asserting")
> Fixes: c345ec6a50e9 ("ata: ahci_brcm: Support BCM7216 reset controller name")
> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Hi Jens,

I am happy to take this series via the PCI tree but I'd need your
ACK on this patch, please let me know if you are OK with it.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c
> index 5b32df5d33ad..6e9c5ade4c2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ struct brcm_ahci_priv {
>  	u32 port_mask;
>  	u32 quirks;
>  	enum brcm_ahci_version version;
> -	struct reset_control *rcdev;
> +	struct reset_control *rcdev_rescal;
> +	struct reset_control *rcdev_ahci;
>  };
>  
>  static inline u32 brcm_sata_readreg(void __iomem *addr)
> @@ -352,8 +353,8 @@ static int brcm_ahci_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	else
>  		ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (priv->version != BRCM_SATA_BCM7216)
> -		reset_control_assert(priv->rcdev);
> +	reset_control_assert(priv->rcdev_ahci);
> +	reset_control_rearm(priv->rcdev_rescal);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -365,10 +366,10 @@ static int __maybe_unused brcm_ahci_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	struct brcm_ahci_priv *priv = hpriv->plat_data;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (priv->version == BRCM_SATA_BCM7216)
> -		ret = reset_control_reset(priv->rcdev);
> -	else
> -		ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->rcdev);
> +	ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->rcdev_ahci);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	ret = reset_control_reset(priv->rcdev_rescal);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> @@ -434,7 +435,6 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> -	const char *reset_name = NULL;
>  	struct brcm_ahci_priv *priv;
>  	struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv;
>  	struct resource *res;
> @@ -456,15 +456,15 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (IS_ERR(priv->top_ctrl))
>  		return PTR_ERR(priv->top_ctrl);
>  
> -	/* Reset is optional depending on platform and named differently */
> -	if (priv->version == BRCM_SATA_BCM7216)
> -		reset_name = "rescal";
> -	else
> -		reset_name = "ahci";
> -
> -	priv->rcdev = devm_reset_control_get_optional(&pdev->dev, reset_name);
> -	if (IS_ERR(priv->rcdev))
> -		return PTR_ERR(priv->rcdev);
> +	if (priv->version == BRCM_SATA_BCM7216) {
> +		priv->rcdev_rescal = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(
> +			&pdev->dev, "rescal");
> +		if (IS_ERR(priv->rcdev_rescal))
> +			return PTR_ERR(priv->rcdev_rescal);
> +	}
> +	priv->rcdev_ahci = devm_reset_control_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "ahci");
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->rcdev_ahci))
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->rcdev_ahci);
>  
>  	hpriv = ahci_platform_get_resources(pdev, 0);
>  	if (IS_ERR(hpriv))
> @@ -485,10 +485,10 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (priv->version == BRCM_SATA_BCM7216)
> -		ret = reset_control_reset(priv->rcdev);
> -	else
> -		ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->rcdev);
> +	ret = reset_control_reset(priv->rcdev_rescal);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->rcdev_ahci);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> @@ -539,8 +539,8 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  out_disable_clks:
>  	ahci_platform_disable_clks(hpriv);
>  out_reset:
> -	if (priv->version != BRCM_SATA_BCM7216)
> -		reset_control_assert(priv->rcdev);
> +	reset_control_assert(priv->rcdev_ahci);
> +	reset_control_rearm(priv->rcdev_rescal);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller

[Jens Axboe]

On 4/6/21 9:16 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:45:54PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>> This driver may use one of two resets controllers.  Keep them in separate
>> variables to keep things simple.  The reset controller "rescal" is shared
>> between the AHCI driver and the PCIe driver for the BrcmSTB 7216 chip.  Use
>> devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared() to handle this sharing.
>>
>> Fixes: 272ecd60a636 ("ata: ahci_brcm: BCM7216 reset is self de-asserting")
>> Fixes: c345ec6a50e9 ("ata: ahci_brcm: Support BCM7216 reset controller name")
>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
>> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> Hi Jens,
> 
> I am happy to take this series via the PCI tree but I'd need your
> ACK on this patch, please let me know if you are OK with it.

That'd be fine:

Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

-- 
Jens Axboe

[PATCH v5 2/2] PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert

[Jim Quinlan]

The Broadcom STB PCIe RC uses a reset control "rescal" for certain chips.
The "rescal" implements a "pulse reset" so using assert/deassert is wrong
for this device.  Instead, we use reset/rearm.  We need to use rearm so
that we can reset it after a suspend/resume cycle; w/o using "rearm", the
"rescal" device will only ever fire once.

Of course for suspend/resume to work we also need to put the reset/rearm
calls in the suspend and resume routines.

Fixes: 740d6c3708a9 ("PCI: brcmstb: Add control of rescal reset")
Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
index e330e6811f0b..3b35d629035e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
@@ -1148,6 +1148,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_suspend(struct device *dev)
 
 	brcm_pcie_turn_off(pcie);
 	ret = brcm_phy_stop(pcie);
+	reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
 	clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -1163,9 +1164,13 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
 	base = pcie->base;
 	clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk);
 
+	ret = reset_control_reset(pcie->rescal);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_disable_clk;
+
 	ret = brcm_phy_start(pcie);
 	if (ret)
-		goto err;
+		goto err_reset;
 
 	/* Take bridge out of reset so we can access the SERDES reg */
 	pcie->bridge_sw_init_set(pcie, 0);
@@ -1180,14 +1185,16 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
 
 	ret = brcm_pcie_setup(pcie);
 	if (ret)
-		goto err;
+		goto err_reset;
 
 	if (pcie->msi)
 		brcm_msi_set_regs(pcie->msi);
 
 	return 0;
 
-err:
+err_reset:
+	reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
+err_disable_clk:
 	clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1197,7 +1204,7 @@ static void __brcm_pcie_remove(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
 	brcm_msi_remove(pcie);
 	brcm_pcie_turn_off(pcie);
 	brcm_phy_stop(pcie);
-	reset_control_assert(pcie->rescal);
+	reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
 	clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
 }
 
@@ -1278,13 +1285,13 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(pcie->perst_reset);
 	}
 
-	ret = reset_control_deassert(pcie->rescal);
+	ret = reset_control_reset(pcie->rescal);
 	if (ret)
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to deassert 'rescal'\n");
 
 	ret = brcm_phy_start(pcie);
 	if (ret) {
-		reset_control_assert(pcie->rescal);
+		reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
 		clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
 		return ret;
 	}
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:45:55PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> The Broadcom STB PCIe RC uses a reset control "rescal" for certain chips.
> The "rescal" implements a "pulse reset" so using assert/deassert is wrong
> for this device.  Instead, we use reset/rearm.  We need to use rearm so
> that we can reset it after a suspend/resume cycle; w/o using "rearm", the
> "rescal" device will only ever fire once.
> 
> Of course for suspend/resume to work we also need to put the reset/rearm
> calls in the suspend and resume routines.
> 
> Fixes: 740d6c3708a9 ("PCI: brcmstb: Add control of rescal reset")
> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Should I take this patch in the PCI queue ?

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> index e330e6811f0b..3b35d629035e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> @@ -1148,6 +1148,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	brcm_pcie_turn_off(pcie);
>  	ret = brcm_phy_stop(pcie);
> +	reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
>  
>  	return ret;
> @@ -1163,9 +1164,13 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	base = pcie->base;
>  	clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk);
>  
> +	ret = reset_control_reset(pcie->rescal);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_disable_clk;
> +
>  	ret = brcm_phy_start(pcie);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto err;
> +		goto err_reset;
>  
>  	/* Take bridge out of reset so we can access the SERDES reg */
>  	pcie->bridge_sw_init_set(pcie, 0);
> @@ -1180,14 +1185,16 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	ret = brcm_pcie_setup(pcie);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto err;
> +		goto err_reset;
>  
>  	if (pcie->msi)
>  		brcm_msi_set_regs(pcie->msi);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> -err:
> +err_reset:
> +	reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
> +err_disable_clk:
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -1197,7 +1204,7 @@ static void __brcm_pcie_remove(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
>  	brcm_msi_remove(pcie);
>  	brcm_pcie_turn_off(pcie);
>  	brcm_phy_stop(pcie);
> -	reset_control_assert(pcie->rescal);
> +	reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1278,13 +1285,13 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return PTR_ERR(pcie->perst_reset);
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = reset_control_deassert(pcie->rescal);
> +	ret = reset_control_reset(pcie->rescal);
>  	if (ret)
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to deassert 'rescal'\n");
>  
>  	ret = brcm_phy_start(pcie);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		reset_control_assert(pcie->rescal);
> +		reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
>  		clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:45:55PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> The Broadcom STB PCIe RC uses a reset control "rescal" for certain chips.
> The "rescal" implements a "pulse reset" so using assert/deassert is wrong
> for this device.  Instead, we use reset/rearm.  We need to use rearm so
> that we can reset it after a suspend/resume cycle; w/o using "rearm", the
> "rescal" device will only ever fire once.
> 
> Of course for suspend/resume to work we also need to put the reset/rearm
> calls in the suspend and resume routines.

Actually - I am sorry but it looks like you will have to split the patch
in two since this is two logical changes.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> Fixes: 740d6c3708a9 ("PCI: brcmstb: Add control of rescal reset")
> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> index e330e6811f0b..3b35d629035e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> @@ -1148,6 +1148,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	brcm_pcie_turn_off(pcie);
>  	ret = brcm_phy_stop(pcie);
> +	reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
>  
>  	return ret;
> @@ -1163,9 +1164,13 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	base = pcie->base;
>  	clk_prepare_enable(pcie->clk);
>  
> +	ret = reset_control_reset(pcie->rescal);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_disable_clk;
> +
>  	ret = brcm_phy_start(pcie);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto err;
> +		goto err_reset;
>  
>  	/* Take bridge out of reset so we can access the SERDES reg */
>  	pcie->bridge_sw_init_set(pcie, 0);
> @@ -1180,14 +1185,16 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	ret = brcm_pcie_setup(pcie);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto err;
> +		goto err_reset;
>  
>  	if (pcie->msi)
>  		brcm_msi_set_regs(pcie->msi);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> -err:
> +err_reset:
> +	reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
> +err_disable_clk:
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -1197,7 +1204,7 @@ static void __brcm_pcie_remove(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
>  	brcm_msi_remove(pcie);
>  	brcm_pcie_turn_off(pcie);
>  	brcm_phy_stop(pcie);
> -	reset_control_assert(pcie->rescal);
> +	reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1278,13 +1285,13 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return PTR_ERR(pcie->perst_reset);
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = reset_control_deassert(pcie->rescal);
> +	ret = reset_control_reset(pcie->rescal);
>  	if (ret)
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to deassert 'rescal'\n");
>  
>  	ret = brcm_phy_start(pcie);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		reset_control_assert(pcie->rescal);
> +		reset_control_rearm(pcie->rescal);
>  		clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert

[Florian Fainelli]

On 3/29/21 9:10 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:45:55PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>> The Broadcom STB PCIe RC uses a reset control "rescal" for certain chips.
>> The "rescal" implements a "pulse reset" so using assert/deassert is wrong
>> for this device.  Instead, we use reset/rearm.  We need to use rearm so
>> that we can reset it after a suspend/resume cycle; w/o using "rearm", the
>> "rescal" device will only ever fire once.
>>
>> Of course for suspend/resume to work we also need to put the reset/rearm
>> calls in the suspend and resume routines.
> 
> Actually - I am sorry but it looks like you will have to split the patch
> in two since this is two logical changes.

I do not believe this can be easily split, since there is currently a
misused of the reset controller API and this patch fixes all call sites
at once. It would not really make sense to fix probe/remove and then
leave suspend/resume broken in the same manner.
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 09:50:13AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 3/29/21 9:10 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:45:55PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> >> The Broadcom STB PCIe RC uses a reset control "rescal" for certain chips.
> >> The "rescal" implements a "pulse reset" so using assert/deassert is wrong
> >> for this device.  Instead, we use reset/rearm.  We need to use rearm so
> >> that we can reset it after a suspend/resume cycle; w/o using "rearm", the
> >> "rescal" device will only ever fire once.
> >>
> >> Of course for suspend/resume to work we also need to put the reset/rearm
> >> calls in the suspend and resume routines.
> > 
> > Actually - I am sorry but it looks like you will have to split the patch
> > in two since this is two logical changes.
> 
> I do not believe this can be easily split, since there is currently a
> misused of the reset controller API and this patch fixes all call sites
> at once. It would not really make sense to fix probe/remove and then
> leave suspend/resume broken in the same manner.

Right - I was reading the previous versions of the set, it makes sense
to keep it in one logical change.

Do you want me to take it or you prefer an ACK so that it can go via
a different tree ?

Thanks,
Lorenzo

Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert

[Florian Fainelli]

On 3/29/21 9:58 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 09:50:13AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 3/29/21 9:10 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:45:55PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>>>> The Broadcom STB PCIe RC uses a reset control "rescal" for certain chips.
>>>> The "rescal" implements a "pulse reset" so using assert/deassert is wrong
>>>> for this device.  Instead, we use reset/rearm.  We need to use rearm so
>>>> that we can reset it after a suspend/resume cycle; w/o using "rearm", the
>>>> "rescal" device will only ever fire once.
>>>>
>>>> Of course for suspend/resume to work we also need to put the reset/rearm
>>>> calls in the suspend and resume routines.
>>>
>>> Actually - I am sorry but it looks like you will have to split the patch
>>> in two since this is two logical changes.
>>
>> I do not believe this can be easily split, since there is currently a
>> misused of the reset controller API and this patch fixes all call sites
>> at once. It would not really make sense to fix probe/remove and then
>> leave suspend/resume broken in the same manner.
> 
> Right - I was reading the previous versions of the set, it makes sense
> to keep it in one logical change.
> 
> Do you want me to take it or you prefer an ACK so that it can go via
> a different tree ?

I would be comfortable with you taking this via the PCI driver trees, we
would want an Ack from Jens that he is okay with taking the ahci_brcm.c
change as well through your tree.

Thank you!
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:45:53 -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> v5 -- Improved (I hope) commit description (Bjorn).
>    -- Rnamed error labels (Krzyszt).
>    -- Fixed typos.
> 
> v4 -- does not rely on a pending commit, unlike v3.
> 
> v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function
>       reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied
>       to reset/next.
>    -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller
>       to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert.
> 
> [...]

Applied to pci/brcmstb, thanks!

[1/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller
      https://git.kernel.org/lpieralisi/pci/c/92b9cb55a9
[2/2] PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert
      https://git.kernel.org/lpieralisi/pci/c/a24fd1d646

Thanks,
Lorenzo

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller

[Florian Fainelli]

On 4/6/2021 8:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:45:53 -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>> v5 -- Improved (I hope) commit description (Bjorn).
>>    -- Rnamed error labels (Krzyszt).
>>    -- Fixed typos.
>>
>> v4 -- does not rely on a pending commit, unlike v3.
>>
>> v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function
>>       reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied
>>       to reset/next.
>>    -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller
>>       to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert.
>>
>> [...]
> 
> Applied to pci/brcmstb, thanks!
> 
> [1/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller
>       https://git.kernel.org/lpieralisi/pci/c/92b9cb55a9
> [2/2] PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert
>       https://git.kernel.org/lpieralisi/pci/c/a24fd1d646

Thanks a lot!
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller

[Bjorn Helgaas]

[+cc Amjad, Philipp: possible issue with 557acb3d2cd9 ("reset: make
shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable") below; report at
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/20210428200058.GA366202@bjorn-Precision-5520/]

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 04:34:00PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 4:01 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:45:53PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > > v5 -- Improved (I hope) commit description (Bjorn).
> > >    -- Rnamed error labels (Krzyszt).
> > >    -- Fixed typos.
> > >
> > > v4 -- does not rely on a pending commit, unlike v3.
> > >
> > > v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function
> > >       reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied
> > >       to reset/next.
> > >    -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller
> > >       to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert.
> > >
> > > v2 -- refactor rescal-reset driver to implement assert/deassert rather than
> > >       reset because the reset call only fires once per lifetime and we need
> > >       to reset after every resume from S2 or S3.
> > >    -- Split the use of "ahci" and "rescal" controllers in separate fields
> > >       to keep things simple.
> > >
> > > v1 -- original
> > >
> > > Jim Quinlan (2):
> > >   ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller
> > >   PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert
> > >
> > >  drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c               | 46 +++++++++++++--------------
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 19 +++++++----
> > >  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > Tripped over these errors while build testing with the .config below.
> > This is on the pci/brcmstb branch from
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/pci.git
> >
> > Dropping the pci/brcmstb branch while we get this figured out.  This will
> > remove the following commits:
> >
> >   a24fd1d6469f ("PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert")
> >   92b9cb55a9b6 ("ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller")
> >   b5d9209d5083 ("PCI: brcmstb: Fix error return code in brcm_pcie_probe()")
> 
> Hi Bjorn,
> 
> I believe the problem is that the commit
> 
> 557acb3d2cd9c82de19f944f6cc967a347735385
> "reset: make shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable"
> 
> defined reset_control_rearm() for the CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER=y  case
> but forgot to define  an empty function for the unset case.  Your test
> .config has this CONFIG unset.
> 
> Would you like me to resubmit this with an additional commit that
> fixes this?

The fix could be a patch along those lines, or it could be a Kconfig
change that makes this config impossible.  I didn't look deeper to see
what makes sense.  But I don't think the fix should be "manually avoid
this configuration."

It looks like 557acb3d2cd9 ("reset: make shared pulsed reset controls
re-triggerable") appeared in v5.11, so if a patch is the right thing,
it should probably be marked for stable ("v5.11+").

Bjorn

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller

[Florian Fainelli]

On 4/28/2021 1:53 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Amjad, Philipp: possible issue with 557acb3d2cd9 ("reset: make
> shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable") below; report at
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/20210428200058.GA366202@bjorn-Precision-5520/]
> 
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 04:34:00PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 4:01 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:45:53PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>>>> v5 -- Improved (I hope) commit description (Bjorn).
>>>>    -- Rnamed error labels (Krzyszt).
>>>>    -- Fixed typos.
>>>>
>>>> v4 -- does not rely on a pending commit, unlike v3.
>>>>
>>>> v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function
>>>>       reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied
>>>>       to reset/next.
>>>>    -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller
>>>>       to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert.
>>>>
>>>> v2 -- refactor rescal-reset driver to implement assert/deassert rather than
>>>>       reset because the reset call only fires once per lifetime and we need
>>>>       to reset after every resume from S2 or S3.
>>>>    -- Split the use of "ahci" and "rescal" controllers in separate fields
>>>>       to keep things simple.
>>>>
>>>> v1 -- original
>>>>
>>>> Jim Quinlan (2):
>>>>   ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller
>>>>   PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert
>>>>
>>>>  drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c               | 46 +++++++++++++--------------
>>>>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 19 +++++++----
>>>>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Tripped over these errors while build testing with the .config below.
>>> This is on the pci/brcmstb branch from
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/pci.git
>>>
>>> Dropping the pci/brcmstb branch while we get this figured out.  This will
>>> remove the following commits:
>>>
>>>   a24fd1d6469f ("PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert")
>>>   92b9cb55a9b6 ("ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller")
>>>   b5d9209d5083 ("PCI: brcmstb: Fix error return code in brcm_pcie_probe()")
>>
>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>> I believe the problem is that the commit
>>
>> 557acb3d2cd9c82de19f944f6cc967a347735385
>> "reset: make shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable"
>>
>> defined reset_control_rearm() for the CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER=y  case
>> but forgot to define  an empty function for the unset case.  Your test
>> .config has this CONFIG unset.
>>
>> Would you like me to resubmit this with an additional commit that
>> fixes this?
> 
> The fix could be a patch along those lines, or it could be a Kconfig
> change that makes this config impossible.  I didn't look deeper to see
> what makes sense.  But I don't think the fix should be "manually avoid
> this configuration."
> 
> It looks like 557acb3d2cd9 ("reset: make shared pulsed reset controls
> re-triggerable") appeared in v5.11, so if a patch is the right thing,
> it should probably be marked for stable ("v5.11+").

All of the other reset controller API have inline stubs when
CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER is disabled, not having one for
reset_control_rearm() seems like an oversight (easy to make since if you
introduce the API you obviously needed it and did not consider the case
where it may not be available).

I agree this would be stable material.
-- 
Florian