From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57D9C47095 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 14:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A45611AD for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 14:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230416AbhFGOdO (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:33:14 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f181.google.com ([209.85.210.181]:37556 "EHLO mail-pf1-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230239AbhFGOdO (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:33:14 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f181.google.com with SMTP id y15so13202716pfl.4; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 07:31:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=h6CG2bMQTbzoeKiCNTYjo7P9Il/mWVmgFb8ULia79oo=; b=I9t1OZEZPobhkA3hf2acJxnViGRdaufqM5+op4JunH2jb4Imy6JUGmqUWmbEdg/EZ9 5S/Xhj1avqhJwzAjtyuwGRkqRS0DW98mxmcm6B3d50Q+ZXi5Whkh9Tv2qSBmA9oUqUkJ QAQJpc9ji1ypPYx2KxT+m2jSaPs0CImK7xn4JbMFo2zrX7Fy0L0v9YEllNxCdPCDgglA FuOTczaNmB0/Us4YraeuoElsBkhRz+Qr1iiwX5G26bDDZanKZqohCCjWjFu2/EY0IeC+ nnDR5fzju0H+np6EkQ4CRIJ6fQBbuV0RbVsFBuRVgMyYp/aQYFHnIr2VNFWhNrDt3wpO FxlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=h6CG2bMQTbzoeKiCNTYjo7P9Il/mWVmgFb8ULia79oo=; b=Gxm5raoZXNuI4otxGsYTPdQV/0Bf+PxlXjktZTsX4rDg5QOnrFNXvetQ+qfRXYA2n/ g/6t0KR8um9GvxJ9f1xIdPLVQe+XPZ0yDz1v6X3cQIQC7amSgaoRjdl8ACRtcFZDnzsF vbAwcF7x5hsHh6TJSB6vzqpzV0JPbLSsl9ovXlmBb/l6KmeyX61Yho+vNTwo0SrhUZ8q 74EtW/SXoQIAZf3zvsfgo1Dgm4P4Il+AiZgNIYAtX8InLom6wngwCr6TmP2y/k6qmRT9 O442k8hXPl4XtHLFMMlKOIynuX1FU/ifw6LQ2SBe2g00PGaMynGEWSGZMlEf5QS8u7Lz iMAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iuMll5mnkvQXqSp49GOU3SF/uv4zZO6NGqUrpEsPUWUf21E2B AUH1SghsvKg6u8JwOk47lMA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzLHRV2yytEQkLzu/K5A9ErmC8MtuEAatyPW9JfnHku3sG0kejkTmYQ8lPdcs1invl5PfrF/Q== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5118:: with SMTP id f24mr18035389pgb.34.1623076222927; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 07:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (185.212.56.112.16clouds.com. [185.212.56.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e21sm12592504pjh.55.2021.06.07.07.30.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Jun 2021 07:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 22:30:20 +0800 From: Dejin Zheng To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: helgaas@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, rric@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Introduce pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() Message-ID: <20210607143020.GB821146@nuc8i5> References: <20210606070511.778487-1-zhengdejin5@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 12:09:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 03:05:07PM +0800, Dejin Zheng wrote: > > Introduce pcim_alloc_irq_vectors(), a device-managed version of > > pci_alloc_irq_vectors(), In some i2c drivers, If pcim_enable_device() > > has been called before, then pci_alloc_irq_vectors() is actually a > > device-managed function. It is used as a device-managed function, So > > replace it with pcim_alloc_irq_vectors(). > > Thanks! > > > Changelog > > --------- > > v5 -> v6: > > - rebase to 5.13-rc4 > > It's already rc5 and I believe you better use the subsystem tree against which > your series is (i.e. PCI for-next or how it is called there). > Andy, Thanks for your reminder, I will use PCI for-next branch for new patch version. BR, Dejin > Besides that kbuild bot is not happy. > > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >