linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Chuanjia Liu <chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, ryder.lee@mediatek.com,
	jianjun.wang@mediatek.com, yong.wu@mediatek.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/6] PCI: mediatek: Add new method to get irq number
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 13:30:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210831183022.GA120514@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210823032800.1660-4-chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com>

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:27:57AM +0800, Chuanjia Liu wrote:
> Use platform_get_irq_byname() to get the irq number
> if the property of "interrupt-names" is defined.

From patch 1/6, I have the impression that this patch is part of
fixing an MSI issue.  If so, this commit log should mention that as
well.

> Signed-off-by: Chuanjia Liu <chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com>
> Acked-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> index 4296d9e04240..19e35ac62d43 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> @@ -654,7 +654,11 @@ static int mtk_pcie_setup_irq(struct mtk_pcie_port *port,
>  		return err;
>  	}
>  
> -	port->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, port->slot);
> +	if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "interrupt-names", NULL))
> +		port->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "pcie_irq");
> +	else
> +		port->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, port->slot);

This would be the only instance of this pattern, where we look for a
property and use the result to decide how to look for the IRQ.

dw_pcie_host_init() does something like this:

  port->irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "pcie_irq");
  if (port->irq < 0) {
    port->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, port->slot);
    if (port->irq < 0)
      return port->irq;
  }

Would that work for you?  If not, the commit log should explain why
you can't use the standard pattern.

If you do things differently than other drivers, it makes things
harder to review and slows things down.  If you *have* to do something
differently and it adds real value to be different, that's fine.  But
we should avoid unnecessary differences.

>  	if (port->irq < 0)
>  		return port->irq;
>  
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-31 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-23  3:27 [PATCH v12 0/6] PCI: mediatek: Spilt PCIe node to comply with hardware design Chuanjia Liu
2021-08-23  3:27 ` [PATCH v12 1/6] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek: Update the Device tree bindings Chuanjia Liu
2021-08-23  3:27 ` [PATCH v12 2/6] PCI: mediatek: Add new method to get shared pcie-cfg base address Chuanjia Liu
2021-08-27 16:46   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-30  7:09     ` Chuanjia Liu
2021-08-30 21:43       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-31  3:31         ` Chuanjia Liu
2021-08-31 15:17           ` Rob Herring
2021-09-02  9:34             ` Chuanjia Liu
2021-08-31 15:04     ` Rob Herring
2021-08-31 15:47       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-08-31 18:24         ` Rob Herring
2021-08-23  3:27 ` [PATCH v12 3/6] PCI: mediatek: Add new method to get irq number Chuanjia Liu
2021-08-31 18:30   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2021-09-02  9:28     ` Chuanjia Liu
2021-08-23  3:27 ` [PATCH v12 4/6] PCI: mediatek: Get pci domain and decide how to parse node Chuanjia Liu
2021-08-23  3:27 ` [PATCH v12 5/6] arm64: dts: mediatek: Split PCIe node for MT2712 and MT7622 Chuanjia Liu
2021-09-21 18:43   ` Matthias Brugger
2021-08-23  3:28 ` [PATCH v12 6/6] ARM: dts: mediatek: Update MT7629 PCIe node for new format Chuanjia Liu
2021-09-21 18:43   ` Matthias Brugger
2021-08-26 12:53 ` [PATCH v12 0/6] PCI: mediatek: Spilt PCIe node to comply with hardware design Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210831183022.GA120514@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).