From: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: "Bolarinwa O. Saheed" <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 4/5] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.downstream
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 17:29:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211107162941.1196-5-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211107162941.1196-1-refactormyself@gmail.com>
From: "Bolarinwa O. Saheed" <refactormyself@gmail.com>
Information on the downstream component is cached in
struct pcie_link_state.downstream it obtained within
alloc_pcie_link_state() by calling pci_function_0()
- remove *downstream* from the struct pcie_link_state.
- replaces references to pcie_link_state.downstream with
a call to pci_function_0(pdev->subordinate).
Signed-off-by: Saheed O. Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
---
drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
index 90c7a0b379f4..12623556f750 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ struct aspm_latency {
struct pcie_link_state {
struct pci_dev *pdev; /* Upstream component of the Link */
- struct pci_dev *downstream; /* Downstream component, function 0 */
struct list_head sibling; /* node in link_list */
/* ASPM state */
@@ -462,7 +461,8 @@ static void pci_clear_and_set_dword(struct pci_dev *pdev, int pos,
static void aspm_calc_l1ss_info(struct pcie_link_state *link,
u32 parent_l1ss_cap, u32 child_l1ss_cap)
{
- struct pci_dev *child = link->downstream, *parent = link->pdev;
+ struct pci_dev *parent = link->pdev;
+ struct pci_dev *child = pci_function_0(link->pdev->subordinate);
u32 val1, val2, scale1, scale2;
u32 t_common_mode, t_power_on, l1_2_threshold, scale, value;
u32 ctl1 = 0, ctl2 = 0;
@@ -552,7 +552,8 @@ static void aspm_calc_l1ss_info(struct pcie_link_state *link,
static void pcie_aspm_cap_init(struct pcie_link_state *link, int blacklist)
{
- struct pci_dev *child = link->downstream, *parent = link->pdev;
+ struct pci_dev *parent = link->pdev;
+ struct pci_dev *child = pci_function_0(link->pdev->subordinate);
u32 parent_lnkcap, child_lnkcap;
u16 parent_lnkctl, child_lnkctl;
u32 parent_l1ss_cap, child_l1ss_cap;
@@ -694,7 +695,8 @@ static void pcie_aspm_cap_init(struct pcie_link_state *link, int blacklist)
static void pcie_config_aspm_l1ss(struct pcie_link_state *link, u32 state)
{
u32 val, enable_req;
- struct pci_dev *child = link->downstream, *parent = link->pdev;
+ struct pci_dev *parent = link->pdev;
+ struct pci_dev *child = pci_function_0(link->pdev->subordinate);
enable_req = (link->aspm_enabled ^ state) & state;
@@ -753,7 +755,8 @@ static void pcie_config_aspm_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 val)
static void pcie_config_aspm_link(struct pcie_link_state *link, u32 state)
{
u32 upstream = 0, dwstream = 0;
- struct pci_dev *child = link->downstream, *parent = link->pdev;
+ struct pci_dev *parent = link->pdev;
+ struct pci_dev *child = pci_function_0(link->pdev->subordinate);
struct pci_bus *linkbus = parent->subordinate;
/* Enable only the states that were not explicitly disabled */
@@ -879,7 +882,6 @@ static struct pcie_link_state *alloc_pcie_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&link->sibling);
link->pdev = pdev;
- link->downstream = pci_function_0(pdev->subordinate);
list_add(&link->sibling, &link_list);
pdev->link_state = link;
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-07 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-07 16:29 [RFC PATCH v4 0/5] Remove unncessary linked list from aspm.c Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-11-07 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: Handle NULL value inside pci_upstream_bridge() Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-11-07 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/5] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.parent Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-11-07 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/5] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.root Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-11-07 16:29 ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa [this message]
2021-11-07 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/5] PCI/ASPM: Remove unncessary linked list from aspm.c Saheed O. Bolarinwa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211107162941.1196-5-refactormyself@gmail.com \
--to=refactormyself@gmail.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).