From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>,
gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com, hongxing.zhu@nxp.com,
l.stach@pengutronix.de, linux-imx@nxp.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
lznuaa@gmail.com, vkoul@kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
robh@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
shawnguo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dmaengine: dw-edma: fix dw_edma_probe() can't be call globally
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:52:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220310062242.GB4869@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220309190123.dnivojpqhl52o5vc@mobilestation>
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 10:01:23PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
[...]
> > I'm afraid that this will not work for all cases (unless I miss something). As
> > Zhi Li pointed out, there are places where only chip pointer will be passed and
> > we'd need to extract the private data (dw_edma) from it.
> >
> > Tbh I also considered your idea but because of the above mentioned issue and
> > also referring to other implementations like gpiochip, I settled with Frank's
> > idea of copying the fields.
>
> What places are these? I see the only obstacle is the dw_edma_remove()
> method. But it's easily fixable.
Yeah, right. I overlooked that part.
> Except that, everything else is more
> or less straightforward (just a few methods need to have prototypes
> converted to accepting dw_edma instead dw_edma_chip).
>
> In order to make the code design more coherent, we need to split up
> private data and device/platform info. As I see it dw_edma_chip is
> nothing but a chip info data. The eDMA driver is supposed to mainly
> use and pass it's private data, not the platform info. It will greatly
> improve the code readability and maintainability. Such approach will
> also prevent a temptation of adding new private data fields into the
> dw_edma_chip structure since reaching the pointer to dw_edma will be
> much easier that getting the dw_edma_chip data. In this case
> dw_edma_chip will be something like i2c_board_info in i2c.
>
> Ideally dw_edma_chip could be a temporarily defined device info, which
> memory after the dw_edma_probe() method invocation could be freed. But
> in order to implement that we'd need a bit more modifications
> introduced.
>
While at it, we should also consider adding an ops structure for passing the
callbacks from controller drivers. Currently the eDMA driver has the callbacks
defined in v0-core.c but it is used directly instead of as a callback.
This should anyway needs to be fixed when another version of the IP get's added.
Thanks,
Mani
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-07 22:47 [PATCH v3 1/6] dmaengine: dw-edma: fix dw_edma_probe() can't be call globally Frank Li
2022-03-07 22:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: don't touch internal struct dw_edma Frank Li
2022-03-09 17:25 ` Serge Semin
2022-03-09 17:33 ` Zhi Li
2022-03-07 22:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix programming the source & dest addresses for ep Frank Li
2022-03-07 22:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] dmaengine: dw-edma: Don't rely on the deprecated "direction" member Frank Li
2022-03-07 22:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] dmaengine: dw-edma: add flags at struct dw_edma_chip Frank Li
2022-03-10 7:44 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-03-10 17:00 ` Zhi Li
2022-03-18 18:40 ` Zhi Li
2022-03-18 19:28 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-03-10 7:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-03-07 22:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] PCI: endpoint: functions/pci-epf-test: Support PCI controller DMA Frank Li
2022-03-09 11:44 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-03-09 20:44 ` Zhi Li
2022-03-09 13:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] dmaengine: dw-edma: fix dw_edma_probe() can't be call globally Serge Semin
2022-03-09 16:37 ` Zhi Li
2022-03-09 18:09 ` Serge Semin
2022-03-09 18:12 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-03-09 19:01 ` Serge Semin
2022-03-10 6:22 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2022-03-10 8:41 ` Serge Semin
2022-03-10 8:56 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-03-10 10:51 ` Serge Semin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-07 16:24 Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220310062242.GB4869@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=lznuaa@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).