From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v5 1/4] PCI: Clean up pci_scan_slot()
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 10:38:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220505083839.1315705-2-schnelle@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505083839.1315705-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
While determining the next PCI function is factored out of
pci_scan_slot() into next_fn() the former still handles the first
function as a special case. This duplicates the code from the scan loop.
Furthermore the non ARI branch of next_fn() is generally hard to
understand and especially the check for multifunction devices is hidden
in the handling of NULL devices for non-contiguous multifunction. It
also signals that no further functions need to be scanned by returning
0 via wraparound and this is a valid function number.
Improve upon this by transforming the conditions in next_fn() to be
easier to understand.
By changing next_fn() to return -ENODEV instead of 0 when there is no
next function we can then handle the initial function inside the loop
and deduplicate the shared handling. This also makes it more explicit
that only function 0 must exist.
No functional change is intended.
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/pci/probe.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 17a969942d37..78aa1bccab2f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -2579,8 +2579,7 @@ struct pci_dev *pci_scan_single_device(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_scan_single_device);
-static unsigned int next_fn(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
- unsigned int fn)
+static int next_fn(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev, int fn)
{
int pos;
u16 cap = 0;
@@ -2588,24 +2587,26 @@ static unsigned int next_fn(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
if (pci_ari_enabled(bus)) {
if (!dev)
- return 0;
+ return -ENODEV;
pos = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ARI);
if (!pos)
- return 0;
+ return -ENODEV;
pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_ARI_CAP, &cap);
next_fn = PCI_ARI_CAP_NFN(cap);
if (next_fn <= fn)
- return 0; /* protect against malformed list */
+ return -ENODEV; /* protect against malformed list */
return next_fn;
}
+ if (fn >= 7)
+ return -ENODEV;
- /* dev may be NULL for non-contiguous multifunction devices */
- if (!dev || dev->multifunction)
- return (fn + 1) % 8;
+ /* only multifunction devices may have more functions */
+ if (dev && !dev->multifunction)
+ return -ENODEV;
- return 0;
+ return fn + 1;
}
static int only_one_child(struct pci_bus *bus)
@@ -2643,26 +2644,25 @@ static int only_one_child(struct pci_bus *bus)
*/
int pci_scan_slot(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
{
- unsigned int fn, nr = 0;
struct pci_dev *dev;
+ int fn = 0, nr = 0;
if (only_one_child(bus) && (devfn > 0))
return 0; /* Already scanned the entire slot */
- dev = pci_scan_single_device(bus, devfn);
- if (!dev)
- return 0;
- if (!pci_dev_is_added(dev))
- nr++;
-
- for (fn = next_fn(bus, dev, 0); fn > 0; fn = next_fn(bus, dev, fn)) {
+ do {
dev = pci_scan_single_device(bus, devfn + fn);
if (dev) {
if (!pci_dev_is_added(dev))
nr++;
- dev->multifunction = 1;
+ if (fn > 0)
+ dev->multifunction = 1;
+ } else if (fn == 0) {
+ /* function 0 is required */
+ break;
}
- }
+ fn = next_fn(bus, dev, fn);
+ } while (fn >= 0);
/* Only one slot has PCIe device */
if (bus->self && nr)
--
2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-05 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-05 8:38 [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] PCI: Rework pci_scan_slot() and isolated PCI functions Niklas Schnelle
2022-05-05 8:38 ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2022-05-12 14:56 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 1/4] PCI: Clean up pci_scan_slot() Niklas Schnelle
2022-05-13 14:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-13 14:47 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-05-23 8:40 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-05-05 8:38 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 2/4] PCI: Move jailhouse's isolated function handling to pci_scan_slot() Niklas Schnelle
2022-05-05 8:38 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 3/4] PCI: Extend isolated function probing to s390 Niklas Schnelle
2022-05-05 8:38 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 4/4] s390/pci: allow zPCI zbus without a function zero Niklas Schnelle
2022-06-02 10:30 [PATCH RESEND v5 0/4] PCI: Rework pci_scan_slot() and isolated PCI functions Niklas Schnelle
2022-06-02 10:30 ` [PATCH RESEND v5 1/4] PCI: Clean up pci_scan_slot() Niklas Schnelle
2022-06-15 11:09 ` Niklas Schnelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220505083839.1315705-2-schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).