Re: [PATCH v6 20/21] PCI/P2PDMA: Introduce pci_mmap_p2pmem()

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>]

On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 04:41:08PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> > 
> > IIRC this is the last part:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220524190632.3304-1-alex.sierra@amd.com/
> > 
> > And the earlier bit with Christoph's pieces looks like it might get
> > merged to v5.19..
> > 
> > The general idea is once pte_devmap is not set then all the
> > refcounting works the way it should. This is what all new ZONE_DEVICE
> > users should do..
> 
> Ok, I don't actually follow how those patches relate to this.
> 
> Based on your description I guess I don't need to set PFN_DEV and

Yes

> perhaps not use vmf_insert_mixed()? And then just use vm_normal_page()?

I'm not sure ATM the best function to use, but yes, a function that
doesn't set PFN_DEV is needed here.
 
> But the refcounting of the pages seemed like it was already sane to me,
> unless you mean that the code no longer has to synchronize_rcu() before
> returning the pages... 

Right. It also doesn't need to call unmap range or keep track of the
inode, or do any of that stuff unless it really needs mmap revokation
semantics (which I doubt this use case does)

unmap range was only necessary because the refcounting is wrong -
since the pte's don't hold a ref on the page in PFN_DEV mode it is
necessary to wipe all the PTE explicitly before going ahead to
decrement the refcount on this path.

Just stuff the pages into the mmap, and your driver unprobe will
automatically block until all the mmaps are closed - no different than
having an open file descriptor or something.

Jason