linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Strachuk <strochuk@ispras.ru>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Strachuk <strochuk@ispras.ru>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ldv-project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ACPI/PCI: Remove useless NULL pointer checks
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 12:47:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220720094743.471304-1-strochuk@ispras.ru> (raw)

Local variable 'p' is initialized by an address
of field of acpi_resource, so it does not make
sense to compare 'p' with NULL.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Strachuk <strochuk@ispras.ru>
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index 58647051c948..aa1038b8aec4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_possible(struct acpi_resource *resource,
 	case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ:
 		{
 			struct acpi_resource_irq *p = &resource->data.irq;
-			if (!p || !p->interrupt_count) {
+			if (!p->interrupt_count) {
 				acpi_handle_debug(handle,
 						  "Blank _PRS IRQ resource\n");
 				return AE_OK;
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_possible(struct acpi_resource *resource,
 		{
 			struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *p =
 			    &resource->data.extended_irq;
-			if (!p || !p->interrupt_count) {
+			if (!p->interrupt_count) {
 				acpi_handle_debug(handle,
 						  "Blank _PRS EXT IRQ resource\n");
 				return AE_OK;
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_current(struct acpi_resource *resource,
 	case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ:
 		{
 			struct acpi_resource_irq *p = &resource->data.irq;
-			if (!p || !p->interrupt_count) {
+			if (!p->interrupt_count) {
 				/*
 				 * IRQ descriptors may have no IRQ# bits set,
 				 * particularly those w/ _STA disabled
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_current(struct acpi_resource *resource,
 		{
 			struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *p =
 			    &resource->data.extended_irq;
-			if (!p || !p->interrupt_count) {
+			if (!p->interrupt_count) {
 				/*
 				 * extended IRQ descriptors must
 				 * return at least 1 IRQ
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-07-20  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-20  9:47 Andrey Strachuk [this message]
2022-07-20 20:44 ` [PATCH v2] ACPI/PCI: Remove useless NULL pointer checks Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220720094743.471304-1-strochuk@ispras.ru \
    --to=strochuk@ispras.ru \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=ldv-project@linuxtesting.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).