From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
Zhu Tony <tony.zhu@intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 09/17] iommu/vt-d: Add blocking domain support
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 20:11:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220826121141.50743-10-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220826121141.50743-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
The Intel IOMMU hardwares support blocking DMA transactions by clearing
the translation table entries. This implements a real blocking domain to
avoid using an empty UNMANAGED domain. The detach_dev callback of the
domain ops is not used in any path. Remove it to avoid dead code as well.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 64d30895a4c8..ffd1ff69bf25 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -4127,12 +4127,30 @@ static int md_domain_init(struct dmar_domain *domain, int guest_width)
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * Intel IOMMU blocking domain support:
+ */
+static int blocking_domain_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+ struct device *dev)
+{
+ dmar_remove_one_dev_info(dev);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct iommu_domain blocking_domain = {
+ .ops = &(const struct iommu_domain_ops) {
+ .attach_dev = blocking_domain_attach_dev
+ }
+};
+
static struct iommu_domain *intel_iommu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
{
struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain;
struct iommu_domain *domain;
switch (type) {
+ case IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED:
+ return &blocking_domain;
case IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA:
case IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ:
case IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED:
@@ -4239,12 +4257,6 @@ static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
return domain_add_dev_info(to_dmar_domain(domain), dev);
}
-static void intel_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
- struct device *dev)
-{
- dmar_remove_one_dev_info(dev);
-}
-
static int intel_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
unsigned long iova, phys_addr_t hpa,
size_t size, int iommu_prot, gfp_t gfp)
@@ -4767,7 +4779,6 @@ const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
#endif
.default_domain_ops = &(const struct iommu_domain_ops) {
.attach_dev = intel_iommu_attach_device,
- .detach_dev = intel_iommu_detach_device,
.map_pages = intel_iommu_map_pages,
.unmap_pages = intel_iommu_unmap_pages,
.iotlb_sync_map = intel_iommu_iotlb_sync_map,
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-26 12:11 [PATCH v12 00/17] iommu: SVA and IOPF refactoring Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 01/17] iommu: Add max_pasids field in struct iommu_device Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 02/17] iommu: Add max_pasids field in struct dev_iommu Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 03/17] iommu: Remove SVM_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE support Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 04/17] PCI: Enable PASID only when ACS RR & UF enabled on upstream path Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 14:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 05/17] iommu: Add attach/detach_dev_pasid iommu interface Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 14:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-28 12:52 ` Baolu Lu
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 06/17] iommu: Add IOMMU SVA domain support Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 07/17] iommu: Try to allocate blocking domain when probing device Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 14:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-29 3:40 ` Baolu Lu
2022-08-29 17:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-30 1:46 ` Baolu Lu
2022-08-30 13:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-31 1:49 ` Baolu Lu
2022-08-31 14:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-01 10:44 ` Baolu Lu
2022-09-02 12:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 08/17] iommu: Make free of iommu_domain_ops optional Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 14:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-26 14:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-26 12:11 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2022-08-26 14:54 ` [PATCH v12 09/17] iommu/vt-d: Add blocking domain support Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-28 12:55 ` Baolu Lu
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 10/17] iommu/vt-d: Add SVA " Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 11/17] arm-smmu-v3: Add blocking " Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 14:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 12/17] arm-smmu-v3/sva: Add SVA " Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 14:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-28 13:57 ` Baolu Lu
2022-08-29 17:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-30 2:04 ` Baolu Lu
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 13/17] iommu/sva: Refactoring iommu_sva_bind/unbind_device() Lu Baolu
2022-08-30 7:30 ` Yuan Can
2022-08-30 7:45 ` Baolu Lu
2022-08-30 7:46 ` Baolu Lu
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 14/17] iommu: Remove SVA related callbacks from iommu ops Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 15/17] iommu: Prepare IOMMU domain for IOPF Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 16/17] iommu: Per-domain I/O page fault handling Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 12:11 ` [PATCH v12 17/17] iommu: Rename iommu-sva-lib.{c,h} Lu Baolu
2022-08-26 15:50 ` [PATCH v12 00/17] iommu: SVA and IOPF refactoring Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220826121141.50743-10-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tony.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).