From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4DEECAAD1 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 21:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232084AbiHaV0p (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:26:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54446 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231955AbiHaV0o (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:26:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f53.google.com (mail-ot1-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 352D77B78B; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-f53.google.com with SMTP id br15-20020a056830390f00b0061c9d73b8bdso11146651otb.6; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:26:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=rIyadyeq6YLRftLRyrN0QiirUdnHJN+op5RTIIc+np8=; b=luaXHk+xH0MfVZcIDVtf6jCniMVXtHxJ8UrbW3yaDth5ViJ4buBSNnmS8XKK9efFzD po1fCRrxxz+g+YZbycuFvg2Zv7MRKm05Hw0doE6hOP+QwBoDbDYDOjRx+sBx9PHpGihn vaA5Yk5yLdW5U8cExD3CfTvn8SnPfX7zJw68vDdKuB5JebxVfRzdaptv/9qts5jrH7ef sBWxmlf74PLEzYN5q8EHaqMLZAW2Pa0UqqtUGGldWmrplpisQcYl7nyPOSoMD4XDTKHP IVgIfsE3bOgW560iG7zlffs2USsoCnzrOVoLKwMLWZyZcCg9ZjgTdoT4kGtZD3Q8kl1H yDXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3vKqFoVQNDF7Llb03ZMJnYYJ712f6zysVDcH4lA08BQmte/0Bd +Z/D72wFvCsXTCezZMQ5ZA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7h7g/4sGiJzr8LtSk06Zhc0E+hGHG6a643D5LCN9/i1HNmUyxP4sw3/5p5W25yVMpjgOueGw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:929:b0:63b:25ba:dfe4 with SMTP id v41-20020a056830092900b0063b25badfe4mr8368108ott.311.1661981203420; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (66-90-144-107.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.144.107]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o139-20020a4a2c91000000b00435ae9a836asm8623117ooo.15.2022.08.31.14.26.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 279436 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 21:26:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:26:31 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Serge Semin Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Jingoo Han , Gustavo Pimentel , Heiko Stuebner , Shawn Lin , Simon Xue , Serge Semin , Alexey Malahov , Pavel Parkhomenko , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Frank Li , Manivannan Sadhasivam , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/20] dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Apply common schema to Rockchip DW PCIe nodes Message-ID: <20220831212631.GA277851-robh@kernel.org> References: <20220822184701.25246-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> <20220822184701.25246-14-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220822184701.25246-14-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 09:46:54PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > As the DT-bindings description states the Rockchip PCIe controller is > based on the DW PCIe RP IP-core thus its DT-nodes are supposed to be > compatible with the common DW PCIe controller schema. Let's make sure they > are evaluated against it by referring to the snps,dw-pcie.yaml schema in > the allOf sub-schemas composition. > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin > > --- > > Changelog v3: > - This is a new patch created on v3 lap of the series. > > Changelog v5: > - Apply snps,dw-pcie.yaml instead of the snps,dw-pcie-common.yaml schema. > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Shouldn't this come before/after patch 7? Reviewed-by: Rob Herring