archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <>
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/5] PCI: dra7xx: Use threaded IRQ handler for "dra7xx-pcie-main" IRQ
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:41:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

The "dra7xx-pcie-main" hard IRQ handler is just printing the IRQ status
and calling the dw_pcie_ep_linkup() API if LINK_UP status is set. But the
execution of dw_pcie_ep_linkup() depends on the EPF driver and may take
more time depending on the EPF implementation.

In general, hard IRQ handlers are supposed to return quickly and not block
for so long. Moreover, there is no real need of the current IRQ handler to
be a hard IRQ handler. So switch to the threaded IRQ handler for the
"dra7xx-pcie-main" IRQ.

Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <>
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
index 38462ed11d07..4ae807e7cf79 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	dra7xx->mode = mode;
-	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, dra7xx_pcie_irq_handler,
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, dra7xx_pcie_irq_handler,
 			       IRQF_SHARED, "dra7xx-pcie-main", dra7xx);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "failed to request irq\n");

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-24  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-24  7:11 [PATCH v5 0/5] PCI: endpoint: Rework the EPC to EPF notification Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-01-24  7:11 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2023-01-24  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] PCI: tegra194: Move dw_pcie_ep_linkup() to threaded IRQ handler Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-01-24  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] PCI: endpoint: Use a separate lock for protecting epc->pci_epf list Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-01-24  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] PCI: endpoint: Use callback mechanism for passing events from EPC to EPF Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-01-24  7:11 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] PCI: endpoint: Use link_up() callback in place of LINK_UP notifier Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-01-24  7:16 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] PCI: endpoint: Rework the EPC to EPF notification Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-13  6:57   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-13 18:32     ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2023-02-13 22:51 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).