linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Jianmin Lv" <lvjianmin@loongson.cn>,
	"Xuefeng Li" <lixuefeng@loongson.cn>,
	"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@gmail.com>,
	"Jiaxun Yang" <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] PCI: Omit pci_disable_device() in .shutdown()
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 12:17:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230201181736.GA1879841@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230201043018.778499-2-chenhuacai@loongson.cn>

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 12:30:17PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> This patch has a long story.
> 
> After cc27b735ad3a7557 ("PCI/portdrv: Turn off PCIe services during
> shutdown") we observe poweroff/reboot failures on systems with LS7A
> chipset.
> 
> We found that if we remove "pci_command &= ~PCI_COMMAND_MASTER" in
> do_pci_disable_device(), it can work well. The hardware engineer says
> that the root cause is that CPU is still accessing PCIe devices while
> poweroff/reboot, and if we disable the Bus Master Bit at this time, the
> PCIe controller doesn't forward requests to downstream devices, and also
> does not send TIMEOUT to CPU, which causes CPU wait forever (hardware
> deadlock).
> 
> To be clear, the sequence is like this:
> 
>   - CPU issues MMIO read to device below Root Port
> 
>   - LS7A Root Port fails to forward transaction to secondary bus
>     because of LS7A Bus Master defect
> 
>   - CPU hangs waiting for response to MMIO read
> 
> Then how is userspace able to use a device after the device is removed?
> 
> To give more details, let's take the graphics driver (e.g. amdgpu) as
> an example. The userspace programs call printf() to display "shutting
> down xxx service" during shutdown/reboot, or the kernel calls printk()
> to display something during shutdown/reboot. These can happen at any
> time, even after we call pcie_port_device_remove() to disable the pcie
> port on the graphic card.
> 
> The call stack is: printk() --> call_console_drivers() --> con->write()
> --> vt_console_print() --> fbcon_putcs()
> 
> This scenario happens because userspace programs (or the kernel itself)
> don't know whether a device is 'usable', they just use it, at any time.
> 
> This hardware behavior is a PCIe protocol violation (Bus Master should
> not be involved in CPU MMIO transactions), and it will be fixed in new
> revisions of hardware (add timeout mechanism for CPU read request,
> whether or not Bus Master bit is cleared).
> 
> On some x86 platforms, radeon/amdgpu devices can cause similar problems
> [1][2].
> 
> Once before I add a quirk to solve the LS7A problem but looks ugly.
> After long time discussions, Bjorn Helgaas suggest simply remove the
> pci_disable_device() in pcie_portdrv_shutdown() and this patch do it
> exactly.
> 
> [1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97980
> [2] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98638
> 
> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c
> index 2cc2e60bcb39..46fad0d813b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c
> @@ -501,7 +501,6 @@ static void pcie_port_device_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	device_for_each_child(&dev->dev, NULL, remove_iter);
>  	pci_free_irq_vectors(dev);
> -	pci_disable_device(dev);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -727,6 +726,19 @@ static void pcie_portdrv_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	}
>  
>  	pcie_port_device_remove(dev);
> +
> +	pci_disable_device(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static void pcie_portdrv_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	if (pci_bridge_d3_possible(dev)) {
> +		pm_runtime_forbid(&dev->dev);
> +		pm_runtime_get_noresume(&dev->dev);
> +		pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&dev->dev);
> +	}
> +
> +	pcie_port_device_remove(dev);

Thanks!  I guess you verified that this actually *does* call all the
port service .remove() methods, right?  aer_remove(), dpc_remove(),
etc?

I *assume* that happens via the device_unregister() done in
remove_iter(), but there's a LOT of code in the middle.

>  }
>  
>  static pci_ers_result_t pcie_portdrv_error_detected(struct pci_dev *dev,
> @@ -777,7 +789,7 @@ static struct pci_driver pcie_portdriver = {
>  
>  	.probe		= pcie_portdrv_probe,
>  	.remove		= pcie_portdrv_remove,
> -	.shutdown	= pcie_portdrv_remove,
> +	.shutdown	= pcie_portdrv_shutdown,
>  
>  	.err_handler	= &pcie_portdrv_err_handler,
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-01 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-01  4:30 [PATCH V4 0/2] PCI: Resolve Loongson's LS7A PCI problems Huacai Chen
2023-02-01  4:30 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] PCI: Omit pci_disable_device() in .shutdown() Huacai Chen
2023-02-01 18:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-02-02 13:27     ` Huacai Chen
2023-02-02 20:30       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-02-03  4:00         ` Huacai Chen
2023-02-03 18:03           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-02-01  4:30 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] PCI: loongson: Improve the MRRS quirk for LS7A Huacai Chen
2023-02-01 18:57 ` [PATCH V4 0/2] PCI: Resolve Loongson's LS7A PCI problems Bjorn Helgaas
2023-02-02 13:28   ` Huacai Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230201181736.GA1879841@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@gmail.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@loongson.cn \
    --cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lixuefeng@loongson.cn \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lvjianmin@loongson.cn \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).