linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@samsung.com>,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/7] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Simplify pci_epf_test_alloc_space() loop
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:31:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240320113157.322695-2-cassel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240320113157.322695-1-cassel@kernel.org>

Make pci-epf-test use pci_epc_get_next_free_bar() just like pci-epf-ntb.c
and pci-epf-vntb.c.

Using pci_epc_get_next_free_bar() also makes it more obvious that
pci-epf-test does no special configuration at all.

(The only configuration pci-epf-test does is setting
PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 if epc_features has marked the specific BAR
as only_64bit. pci_epc_get_next_free_bar() already takes only_64bit into
account when looping.)

This way, the code is more consistent between EPF drivers, and pci-epf-test
does not need to explicitly check if the BAR is reserved, or if the index
belongs to a BAR succeeding a 64-bit only BAR.

Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
index cd4ffb39dcdc..16dfd61cd9fb 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
@@ -817,14 +817,13 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
 {
 	struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf);
 	struct device *dev = &epf->dev;
-	struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
 	size_t msix_table_size = 0;
 	size_t test_reg_bar_size;
 	size_t pba_size = 0;
 	bool msix_capable;
 	void *base;
-	int bar, add;
 	enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar;
+	enum pci_barno bar;
 	const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
 	size_t test_reg_size;
 
@@ -849,16 +848,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
 	}
 	epf_test->reg[test_reg_bar] = base;
 
-	for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar += add) {
-		epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
-		add = (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 2 : 1;
+	for (bar = BAR_0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) {
+		bar = pci_epc_get_next_free_bar(epc_features, bar);
+		if (bar == NO_BAR)
+			break;
 
 		if (bar == test_reg_bar)
 			continue;
 
-		if (epc_features->bar[bar].type == BAR_RESERVED)
-			continue;
-
 		base = pci_epf_alloc_space(epf, bar_size[bar], bar,
 					   epc_features, PRIMARY_INTERFACE);
 		if (!base)
-- 
2.44.0


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-20 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-20 11:31 [PATCH v4 0/7] minor PCI endpoint cleanups Niklas Cassel
2024-03-20 11:31 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2024-03-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] PCI: endpoint: Allocate a 64-bit BAR if that is the only option Niklas Cassel
2024-03-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Remove superfluous code Niklas Cassel
2024-03-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Simplify pci_epf_test_set_bar() loop Niklas Cassel
2024-03-22 10:31   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Clean up pci_epf_test_unbind() Niklas Cassel
2024-03-22 10:31   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] PCI: cadence: Set a 64-bit BAR if requested Niklas Cassel
2024-03-20 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] PCI: rockchip-ep: " Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240320113157.322695-2-cassel@kernel.org \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=shradha.t@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).