From: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
To: <lpieralisi@kernel.org>, <kw@linux.com>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
<fancer.lancer@gmail.com>, <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
<cassel@kernel.org>, <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <srk@ti.com>,
<s-vadapalli@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] PCI: keystone: Fix pci_ops for AM654x SoC
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:07:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240325053722.1955433-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com> (raw)
In the process of converting .scan_bus() callbacks to .add_bus(), the
ks_pcie_v3_65_scan_bus() function was changed to ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus().
The .scan_bus() method belonged to ks_pcie_host_ops which was specific
to controller version 3.65a, while the .add_bus() method had been added
to ks_pcie_ops which is shared between the controller versions 3.65a and
4.90a. Neither the older ks_pcie_v3_65_scan_bus() method, nor the newer
ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus() method are applicable to the controller version
4.90a which is present in AM654x SoCs.
Thus, as a fix, move the contents of "ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus()" to the
.host_init callback "ks_pcie_host_init()" and execute it only for non
AM654x SoC devices which have the v3.65a DWC PCIe IP Controllers.
Fixes: 6ab15b5e7057 ("PCI: dwc: keystone: Convert .scan_bus() callback to use add_bus")
Suggested-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
---
Hello,
This patch is based on linux-next tagged next-20240325.
This patch is technically the next version for the v3 patch at:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20231019081330.2975470-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com/
but the implementation is based on the RFC patch at:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20231027084159.4166188-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com/
Since the RFC patch mentioned above fixes the same issue being
fixed by the v3 patch, I have dropped the v3 patch and am using
the RFC patch since it is a cleaner implementation and was discussed at:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231019220847.GA1413474@bhelgaas/
Regards,
Siddharth.
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c | 51 ++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
index 844de4418724..f45bdeac520a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
@@ -445,44 +445,10 @@ static struct pci_ops ks_child_pcie_ops = {
.write = pci_generic_config_write,
};
-/**
- * ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus() - keystone add_bus post initialization
- * @bus: A pointer to the PCI bus structure.
- *
- * This sets BAR0 to enable inbound access for MSI_IRQ register
- */
-static int ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
- struct dw_pcie_rp *pp = bus->sysdata;
- struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
- struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie = to_keystone_pcie(pci);
-
- if (!pci_is_root_bus(bus))
- return 0;
-
- /* Configure and set up BAR0 */
- ks_pcie_set_dbi_mode(ks_pcie);
-
- /* Enable BAR0 */
- dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, 1);
- dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, SZ_4K - 1);
-
- ks_pcie_clear_dbi_mode(ks_pcie);
-
- /*
- * For BAR0, just setting bus address for inbound writes (MSI) should
- * be sufficient. Use physical address to avoid any conflicts.
- */
- dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, ks_pcie->app.start);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static struct pci_ops ks_pcie_ops = {
.map_bus = dw_pcie_own_conf_map_bus,
.read = pci_generic_config_read,
.write = pci_generic_config_write,
- .add_bus = ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus,
};
/**
@@ -822,6 +788,23 @@ static int __init ks_pcie_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
+ if (!ks_pcie->is_am6) {
+ /* Configure and set up BAR0 */
+ ks_pcie_set_dbi_mode(ks_pcie);
+
+ /* Enable BAR0 */
+ dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, 1);
+ dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, SZ_4K - 1);
+
+ ks_pcie_clear_dbi_mode(ks_pcie);
+
+ /*
+ * For BAR0, just setting bus address for inbound writes (MSI) should
+ * be sufficient. Use physical address to avoid any conflicts.
+ */
+ dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, ks_pcie->app.start);
+ }
+
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
/*
* PCIe access errors that result into OCP errors are caught by ARM as
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-03-25 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 5:37 Siddharth Vadapalli [this message]
2024-03-25 11:23 ` [PATCH v4] PCI: keystone: Fix pci_ops for AM654x SoC Niklas Cassel
2024-03-25 12:22 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-03-25 13:45 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-26 4:59 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-03-26 9:49 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240325053722.1955433-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com \
--to=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=srk@ti.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).