linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] PCI: tegra: Fix building Tegra194 PCIe driver
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 21:11:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <303946c4-29a1-4f5b-6a4c-be451ece20fe@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b027609-a2c3-3df0-5e65-1f282f03cc5d@nvidia.com>


On 08/06/2021 19:34, Vidya Sagar wrote:

...

>>> What is the purpose of PCIE_TEGRA194_EP (added by c57247f940e8 ("PCI:
>>> tegra: Add support for PCIe endpoint mode in Tegra194") [1])?  I don't
>>> see any reference to it in a makefile or a source file.
>>>
>>> It looks like one can build a single driver that works in either host
>>> or endpoint mode, depending on whether a DT node matches
>>> "nvidia,tegra194-pcie" or "nvidia,tegra194-pcie-ep".
>>>
>>> So I think PCIE_TEGRA194_EP is superfluous and should be removed and
>>> you should have a single tristate Kconfig option.
>>
>> This is a good point.
>>
>> Sagar, any reason for this?
> Although it is the same driver that works for both HOST mode and EP
> mode, PCIE_TEGRA194_EP depends on PCI_ENDPOINT whereas the
> PCIE_TEGRA194_HOST mode doesn't. Similarly the PCIE_TEGRA194_HOST mode
> depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN which PCIE_TEGRA194_EP doesn't depend on.
> It is possible to have end point mode support disabled (at sub-system
> level) in the system yet pcie-tegra194 can be compiled for the host mode
> vice-a-versa for the endpoint mode.
> Hence, appropriate config HOST/EP needs to be selected to make sure that
> the rest of the dependencies are enabled in the system.
> Hope I'm able to give the rationale correctly here.

Yes but should we combine them like this ...

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
index 423d35872ce4..206455a9b70d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
@@ -254,15 +254,12 @@ config PCI_MESON
          implement the driver.
 
 config PCIE_TEGRA194
-       tristate
-
-config PCIE_TEGRA194_HOST
-       tristate "NVIDIA Tegra194 (and later) PCIe controller - Host Mode"
+       tristate "NVIDIA Tegra194 (and later) PCIe controller"
        depends on ARCH_TEGRA_194_SOC || COMPILE_TEST
-       depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
-       select PCIE_DW_HOST
+       depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN || PCI_ENDPOINT
+       select PCIE_DW_HOST if PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
+       select PCIE_DW_EP if PCI_ENDPOINT
        select PHY_TEGRA194_P2U
-       select PCIE_TEGRA194
        help
          Enables support for the PCIe controller in the NVIDIA Tegra194 SoC to
          work in host mode. There are two instances of PCIe controllers in
@@ -271,21 +268,6 @@ config PCIE_TEGRA194_HOST
          in order to enable device-specific features PCIE_TEGRA194_EP must be
          selected. This uses the DesignWare core.
 
-config PCIE_TEGRA194_EP
-       tristate "NVIDIA Tegra194 (and later) PCIe controller - Endpoint Mode"
-       depends on ARCH_TEGRA_194_SOC || COMPILE_TEST
-       depends on PCI_ENDPOINT
-       select PCIE_DW_EP
-       select PHY_TEGRA194_P2U
-       select PCIE_TEGRA194
-       help
-         Enables support for the PCIe controller in the NVIDIA Tegra194 SoC to
-         work in endpoint mode. There are two instances of PCIe controllers in
-         Tegra194. This controller can work either as EP or RC. In order to
-         enable host-specific features PCIE_TEGRA194_HOST must be selected and
-         in order to enable device-specific features PCIE_TEGRA194_EP must be
-         selected. This uses the DesignWare core.
-

Furthermore, I wonder if we should just move the code
that is required for ACPI into it's own file like
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194-acpi.c?

Jon

-- 
nvpublic

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-08 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-20  9:01 [PATCH V2] PCI: tegra: Fix building Tegra194 PCIe driver Jon Hunter
2021-05-20  9:57 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-05-20 22:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-05-21 13:11   ` Jon Hunter
2021-06-07 23:50     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-08  7:44       ` Jon Hunter
2021-06-08 13:02         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-08 13:20           ` Jon Hunter
2021-06-08 18:34             ` Vidya Sagar
2021-06-08 20:11               ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2021-06-09 10:23                 ` Jon Hunter
2021-06-09 14:00                   ` Vidya Sagar
2021-06-09 16:18                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-09 17:07                   ` Jon Hunter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=303946c4-29a1-4f5b-6a4c-be451ece20fe@nvidia.com \
    --to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).