From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1233CC433E0 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C429C64F60 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235940AbhBDNYm (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:24:42 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:26482 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235605AbhBDNYm (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:24:42 -0500 IronPort-SDR: oKV57lPw9LVzUIMZmYRJb2PPmHx4fbj0pAPcLSd7U3E2SgvZxPcoG05Bu0+okrPHkL2CLvpXKx cU9/l3HH0OSQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9884"; a="178673518" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,401,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="178673518" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2021 05:22:56 -0800 IronPort-SDR: a47xo9b31R3FLVNucSjlh/sN3LbSlBGDYTa8LHuvBSCf/agDgcXtOXZMHKsoMb7MtFaZRahtAE QjA42NzipnGQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,401,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="393165401" Received: from blu2-mobl3.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.214.206]) ([10.254.214.206]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2021 05:22:50 -0800 Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.jiang@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, dwmw@amazon.co.uk, x86@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, bhelgaas@google.com, maz@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, Leon Romanovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] platform-msi: Add platform check for subdevice irq domain To: Jason Gunthorpe , Megha Dey References: <1612385805-3412-1-git-send-email-megha.dey@intel.com> <1612385805-3412-12-git-send-email-megha.dey@intel.com> <20210204121431.GH4247@nvidia.com> From: Lu Baolu Message-ID: <3082871a-32d7-8472-bd66-eae535ef2c3e@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 21:22:48 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210204121431.GH4247@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Hi Jason, On 2021/2/4 20:14, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 12:56:44PM -0800, Megha Dey wrote: >> +bool arch_support_pci_device_ims(struct pci_dev *pdev) >> +{ > > Consistent language please, we are not using IMS elsewhere, this > feature is called device_msi in Linux. > Thanks for pointing this out. I will correct it. > Jason > Best regards, baolu