On 3/5/19 2:01 PM, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 07:12:51PM +0300, Sergey Miroshnichenko wrote: >> During the safe removal procedure, a Data Link Layer State Changed event >> may occur after pciehp_power_off_slot(), and it is handled when the slot is >> already set to OFF_STATE. This results in re-enabling the device and makes >> it impossible to actually safely remove it. >> >> Add a check for a Presence Detect Changed bit to filter out this interrupt. >> >> It is still possible to re-enable the device if it remains in the slot >> after pressing the Attention Button by pressing it again. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sergey Miroshnichenko >> Cc: Lukas Wunner >> --- >> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c | 8 ++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c >> index 3f3df4c29f6e..941f77b71df4 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c >> @@ -251,6 +251,14 @@ void pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change(struct controller *ctrl, u32 events) >> return; >> } >> >> + /* Handle the DLLSC from the slot which just has been turned off */ >> + if ((events & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC) && >> + !(events & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC) && >> + present && !link_active) { >> + mutex_unlock(&ctrl->state_lock); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> switch (ctrl->state) { >> case BLINKINGON_STATE: >> cancel_delayed_work(&ctrl->button_work); > > Hm, I'd instead prefer amending remove_board() like this: > > if (POWER_CTRL(ctrl)) { > pciehp_power_off_slot(ctrl); > > /* > * After turning power off, we must wait for at least 1 second > * before taking any action that relies on power having been > * removed from the slot/adapter. > */ > msleep(1000); > > + /* ignore link or presence changes caused by power off */ > + atomic_and(~(PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC), > + &ctrl->pending_events); > } > > Would this work for you? Thank you for the review and for the proposed change! This discards exactly the event which caused the issue - I've just checked it on our hardware, and will resend it as a v2. Best regards, Serge > > Thanks, > > Lukas >