From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, mst@redhat.com, sebastien.boeuf@intel.com,
jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
jasowang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: Add DMA configuration for virtual platforms
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:03:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <393cce27-dbed-f075-2a67-9882bed801e7@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200214160413.1475396-3-jean-philippe@linaro.org>
On 14/02/2020 4:04 pm, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Hardware platforms usually describe the IOMMU topology using either
> device-tree pointers or vendor-specific ACPI tables. For virtual
> platforms that don't provide a device-tree, the virtio-iommu device
> contains a description of the endpoints it manages. That information
> allows us to probe endpoints after the IOMMU is probed (possibly as late
> as userspace modprobe), provided it is discovered early enough.
>
> Add a hook to pci_dma_configure(), which returns -EPROBE_DEFER if the
> endpoint is managed by a vIOMMU that will be loaded later, or 0 in any
> other case to avoid disturbing the normal DMA configuration methods.
> When CONFIG_VIRTIO_IOMMU_TOPOLOGY isn't selected, the call to
> virt_dma_configure() is compiled out.
>
> As long as the information is consistent, platforms can provide both a
> device-tree and a built-in topology, and the IOMMU infrastructure is
> able to deal with multiple DMA configuration methods.
Urgh, it's already been established[1] that having IOMMU setup tied to
DMA configuration at driver probe time is not just conceptually wrong
but actually broken, so the concept here worries me a bit. In a world
where of_iommu_configure() and friends are being called much earlier
around iommu_probe_device() time, how badly will this fall apart?
Robin.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/9625faf4-48ef-2dd3-d82f-931d9cf26976@huawei.com/
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> index 0454ca0e4e3f..69303a814f21 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/kexec.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/virt_iommu.h>
> #include "pci.h"
> #include "pcie/portdrv.h"
>
> @@ -1602,6 +1603,10 @@ static int pci_dma_configure(struct device *dev)
> struct device *bridge;
> int ret = 0;
>
> + ret = virt_dma_configure(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> bridge = pci_get_host_bridge_device(to_pci_dev(dev));
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && bridge->parent &&
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-14 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-14 16:04 [PATCH 0/3] virtio-iommu on non-devicetree platforms Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-02-14 16:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] iommu/virtio: Add topology description to virtio-iommu config space Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-02-14 16:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: Add DMA configuration for virtual platforms Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-02-14 17:03 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2020-02-17 9:12 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-02-14 16:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] iommu/virtio: Enable x86 support Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-02-14 16:57 ` Robin Murphy
2020-02-16 9:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-17 9:01 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-02-17 13:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-17 13:22 ` Robin Murphy
2020-02-17 13:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-02-17 14:10 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=393cce27-dbed-f075-2a67-9882bed801e7@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sebastien.boeuf@intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).