Am 21.08.2021 um 01:22 schrieb Pali Rohár:
> On Wednesday 21 July 2021 10:54:53 Pali Rohár wrote:
>> On Tuesday 25 May 2021 17:12:15 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 09:53:38PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday 15 April 2021 13:01:19 Alex Williamson wrote:
>>>>> [cc +Pali]
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:02:23 +0200
>>>>> Ingmar Klein <ingmar_klein@web.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> First thanks to you both, Alex and Bjorn!
>>>>>> I am in no way an expert on this topic, so I have to fully rely on your
>>>>>> feedback, concerning this issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you should have any other solution approach, in form of patch-set, I
>>>>>> would be glad to test it out. Just let me know, what you think might
>>>>>> make sense.
>>>>>> I will wait for your further feedback on the issue. In the meantime I
>>>>>> have my current workaround via quirk entry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By the way, my layman's question:
>>>>>> Do you think, that the following topic might also apply for the QCA6174?
>>>>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg106395.html
>>>> I have been testing more ath cards and I'm going to send a new version
>>>> of this patch with including more PCI ids.
>>> Dropping this patch in favor of Pali's new version.
>> Hello Bjorn! Seems that it would take much more time to finish my
>> version of patch. So could you take Ingmar's patch with cc:stable tag
>> for now, which just adds PCI device id into list of problematic devices?
> Ping, gentle reminder...

Hi Pali and Bjorn,

here is the original trivial patch again.
For the moment, this could do.

Thank you!
Best regards,
Ingmar