Linux-PCI Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Sean V Kelley" <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>
To: "Ethan Zhao" <xerces.zhao@gmail.com>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	"Sean V Kelley" <seanvk.dev@oregontracks.org>,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, "Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	tony.luck@intel.com,
	"Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy"
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@intel.com>,
	qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com, linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>, "Sinan Kaya" <okaya@kernel.org>,
	"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/15] PCI/RCEC: Add RCiEP's linked RCEC to AER/ERR
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:31:14 -0700
Message-ID: <4F54EEC0-3933-4A2E-87BC-23FABECB0C0A@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKF3qh3NDvQAwb922faHgja+YoDydCtg5sugEQ8T2ti+3WSn5Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 19 Oct 2020, at 3:49, Ethan Zhao wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 6:29 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> 
> wrote:
>>
>> [+cc Christoph, Ethan, Sinan, Keith; sorry should have cc'd you to
>> begin with since you're looking at this code too.  Particularly
>> interested in your thoughts about whether we should be touching
>> PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND and PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS when we don't own AER.]
>
> aer_root_reset() function has a prefix  'aer_', looks like it's a
> function of aer driver, will
> only be called by aer driver at runtime. if so it's up to the
> owner/aer to know if OSPM is
> granted to init. while actually some of the functions and runtime 
> service of
> aer driver is also shared by GHES driver (running time) and DPC driver
> (compiling time ?)
> etc. then it is confused now.
>
> Shall we move some of the shared functions and running time service to
> pci/err.c ?
> if so , just like pcie_do_recovery(), it's share by firmware_first  
> mode GHES
> ghes_probe()
> ->ghes_irq_func
>   ->ghes_proc
>     ->ghes_do_proc()
>       ->ghes_handle_aer()
>         ->aer_recover_work_func()
>           ->pcie_do_recovery()
>             ->aer_root_reset()
>
> and aer driver etc.  if aer wants to do some access might conflict
> with firmware(or
> firmware in embedded controller) should check _OSC_ etc first.  
> blindly issue
> PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND  or clear PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS *likely*
> cause errors by error handling itself.

If _OSC negotiation ends up with FW being in control of AER, that means 
OS is not in charge and should not be messing with AER I guess. That 
seems appropriate to me then.

Thanks,

Sean



>
> Thanks,
> Ethan
>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:30:37PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> [+to Jonathan]
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 05:11:10PM -0700, Sean V Kelley wrote:
>>>> From: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> When attempting error recovery for an RCiEP associated with an RCEC 
>>>> device,
>>>> there needs to be a way to update the Root Error Status, the 
>>>> Uncorrectable
>>>> Error Status and the Uncorrectable Error Severity of the parent 
>>>> RCEC.  In
>>>> some non-native cases in which there is no OS-visible device 
>>>> associated
>>>> with the RCiEP, there is nothing to act upon as the firmware is 
>>>> acting
>>>> before the OS.
>>>>
>>>> Add handling for the linked RCEC in AER/ERR while taking into 
>>>> account
>>>> non-native cases.
>>>>
>>>> Co-developed-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>
>>>> Link: 
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201002184735.1229220-12-seanvk.dev@oregontracks.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 53 
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>>  drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 20 ++++++++--------
>>>>  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>>>> index 65dff5f3457a..083f69b67bfd 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>>>> @@ -1357,27 +1357,50 @@ static int aer_probe(struct pcie_device 
>>>> *dev)
>>>>   */
>>>>  static pci_ers_result_t aer_root_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>>  {
>>>> -   int aer = dev->aer_cap;
>>>> +   int type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
>>>> +   struct pci_dev *root;
>>>> +   int aer = 0;
>>>> +   int rc = 0;
>>>>     u32 reg32;
>>>> -   int rc;
>>>>
>>>> +   if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END)
>>>
>>> "type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END"
>>>
>>>> +           /*
>>>> +            * The reset should only clear the Root Error Status
>>>> +            * of the RCEC. Only perform this for the
>>>> +            * native case, i.e., an RCEC is present.
>>>> +            */
>>>> +           root = dev->rcec;
>>>> +   else
>>>> +           root = dev;
>>>>
>>>> -   /* Disable Root's interrupt in response to error messages */
>>>> -   pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, &reg32);
>>>> -   reg32 &= ~ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK;
>>>> -   pci_write_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, reg32);
>>>> +   if (root)
>>>> +           aer = dev->aer_cap;
>>>>
>>>> -   rc = pci_bus_error_reset(dev);
>>>> -   pci_info(dev, "Root Port link has been reset\n");
>>>> +   if (aer) {
>>>> +           /* Disable Root's interrupt in response to error 
>>>> messages */
>>>> +           pci_read_config_dword(root, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, 
>>>> &reg32);
>>>> +           reg32 &= ~ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK;
>>>> +           pci_write_config_dword(root, aer + 
>>>> PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, reg32);
>>>
>>> Not directly related to *this* patch, but my assumption was that in
>>> the APEI case, the firmware should retain ownership of the AER
>>> Capability, so the OS should not touch PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND and
>>> PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS.
>>>
>>> But this code appears to ignore that ownership.  Jonathan, you must
>>> have looked at this recently for 068c29a248b6 ("PCI/ERR: Clear PCIe
>>> Device Status errors only if OS owns AER").  Do you have any insight
>>> about this?
>>>
>>>> -   /* Clear Root Error Status */
>>>> -   pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, &reg32);
>>>> -   pci_write_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, reg32);
>>>> +           /* Clear Root Error Status */
>>>> +           pci_read_config_dword(root, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, 
>>>> &reg32);
>>>> +           pci_write_config_dword(root, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, 
>>>> reg32);
>>>>
>>>> -   /* Enable Root Port's interrupt in response to error messages 
>>>> */
>>>> -   pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, &reg32);
>>>> -   reg32 |= ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK;
>>>> -   pci_write_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, reg32);
>>>> +           /* Enable Root Port's interrupt in response to error 
>>>> messages */
>>>> +           pci_read_config_dword(root, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, 
>>>> &reg32);
>>>> +           reg32 |= ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK;
>>>> +           pci_write_config_dword(root, aer + 
>>>> PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, reg32);
>>>> +   }
>>>> +
>>>> +   if ((type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC) || (type == 
>>>> PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END)) {
>>>> +           if (pcie_has_flr(root)) {
>>>> +                   rc = pcie_flr(root);
>>>> +                   pci_info(dev, "has been reset (%d)\n", rc);
>>>> +           }
>>>> +   } else {
>>>> +           rc = pci_bus_error_reset(root);
>>>
>>> Don't we want "dev" for both the FLR and pci_bus_error_reset()?  I
>>> think "root == dev" except when dev is an RCiEP.  When dev is an
>>> RCiEP, "root" is the RCEC (if present), and we want to reset the
>>> RCiEP, not the RCEC.
>>>
>>>> +           pci_info(dev, "Root Port link has been reset (%d)\n", 
>>>> rc);
>>>> +   }
>>>
>>> There are a couple changes here that I think should be split out.
>>>
>>> Based on my theory that when firmware retains control of AER, the OS
>>> should not touch PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND and PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, and 
>>> any
>>> updates to them would have to be done by firmware before we get 
>>> here,
>>> I suggested reordering this:
>>>
>>>   - clear PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK
>>>   - do reset
>>>   - clear PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS (for APEI, presumably done by 
>>> firmware?)
>>>   - enable PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK
>>>
>>> to this:
>>>
>>>   - clear PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK
>>>   - clear PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS
>>>   - enable PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK
>>>   - do reset
>>>
>>> If my theory is correct, I think we should still reorder this, but:
>>>
>>>   - It's a significant behavior change that deserves its own patch 
>>> so
>>>     we can document/bisect/revert.
>>>
>>>   - I'm not sure why we clear the PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND error 
>>> reporting
>>>     bits.  In the new "clear COMMAND, clear STATUS, enable COMMAND"
>>>     order, it looks superfluous.  There's no reason to disable error
>>>     reporting while clearing the status bits.
>>>
>>>     The current "clear, reset, enable" order suggests that the reset
>>>     might cause errors that we should ignore.  I don't know whether
>>>     that's the case or not.  It dates from 6c2b374d7485 
>>> ("PCI-Express
>>>     AER implemetation: AER core and aerdriver"), which doesn't
>>>     elaborate.
>>>
>>>   - Should we also test for OS ownership of AER before touching
>>>     PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS?
>>>
>>>   - If we remove the PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND fiddling (and I 
>>> tentatively
>>>     think we *should* unless we can justify it), that would also
>>>     deserve its own patch.  Possibly (1) remove PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND
>>>     fiddling, (2) reorder PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS clearing and reset, 
>>> (3)
>>>     test for OS ownership of AER (?), (4) the rest of this patch.
>>>
>>>>     return rc ? PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT : 
>>>> PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
>>>>  }
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
>>>> index 7883c9791562..cbc5abfe767b 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
>>>> @@ -148,10 +148,10 @@ static int report_resume(struct pci_dev *dev, 
>>>> void *data)
>>>>
>>>>  /**
>>>>   * pci_walk_bridge - walk bridges potentially AER affected
>>>> - * @bridge:        bridge which may be a Port, an RCEC with 
>>>> associated RCiEPs,
>>>> - *         or an RCiEP associated with an RCEC
>>>> - * @cb:            callback to be called for each device found
>>>> - * @userdata:      arbitrary pointer to be passed to callback
>>>> + * @bridge   bridge which may be an RCEC with associated RCiEPs,
>>>> + *           or a Port.
>>>> + * @cb       callback to be called for each device found
>>>> + * @userdata arbitrary pointer to be passed to callback.
>>>>   *
>>>>   * If the device provided is a bridge, walk the subordinate bus, 
>>>> including
>>>>   * any bridged devices on buses under this bus.  Call the provided 
>>>> callback
>>>> @@ -164,8 +164,14 @@ static void pci_walk_bridge(struct pci_dev 
>>>> *bridge,
>>>>                         int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *),
>>>>                         void *userdata)
>>>>  {
>>>> +   /*
>>>> +    * In a non-native case where there is no OS-visible reporting
>>>> +    * device the bridge will be NULL, i.e., no RCEC, no Downstream 
>>>> Port.
>>>> +    */
>>>>     if (bridge->subordinate)
>>>>             pci_walk_bus(bridge->subordinate, cb, userdata);
>>>> +   else if (bridge->rcec)
>>>> +           cb(bridge->rcec, userdata);
>>>>     else
>>>>             cb(bridge, userdata);
>>>>  }
>>>> @@ -194,12 +200,6 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct 
>>>> pci_dev *dev,
>>>>     pci_dbg(bridge, "broadcast error_detected message\n");
>>>>     if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {
>>>>             pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_frozen_detected, 
>>>> &status);
>>>> -           if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) {
>>>> -                   pci_warn(dev, "subordinate device reset not 
>>>> possible for RCiEP\n");
>>>> -                   status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
>>>> -                   goto failed;
>>>> -           }
>>>> -
>>>>             status = reset_subordinates(bridge);
>>>>             if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
>>>>                     pci_warn(bridge, "subordinate device reset 
>>>> failed\n");
>>>> --
>>>> 2.28.0
>>>>

  reply index

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-16  0:10 [PATCH v9 00/15] Add RCEC handling to PCI/AER Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:10 ` [PATCH v9 01/15] PCI/RCEC: Add RCEC class code and extended capability Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 02/15] PCI/RCEC: Bind RCEC devices to the Root Port driver Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 03/15] PCI/RCEC: Cache RCEC capabilities in pci_init_capabilities() Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 04/15] PCI/ERR: Rename reset_link() to reset_subordinates() Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 05/15] PCI/ERR: Simplify by using pci_upstream_bridge() Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 06/15] PCI/ERR: Simplify by computing pci_pcie_type() once Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 07/15] PCI/ERR: Use "bridge" for clarity in pcie_do_recovery() Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 08/15] PCI/ERR: Avoid negated conditional for clarity Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 09/15] PCI/ERR: Add pci_walk_bridge() to pcie_do_recovery() Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16 17:19   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 10/15] PCI/ERR: Limit AER resets in pcie_do_recovery() Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16 17:22   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-16 17:36     ` Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 11/15] PCI/RCEC: Add pcie_link_rcec() to associate RCiEPs Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 12/15] PCI/RCEC: Add RCiEP's linked RCEC to AER/ERR Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16 20:30   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-16 22:29     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-17  0:28       ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-10-17  1:45       ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-10-19 10:49       ` Ethan Zhao
2020-10-19 18:31         ` Sean V Kelley [this message]
2020-10-19 18:59           ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-10-19 20:50             ` Sean V Kelley
2020-10-20 12:59               ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-10-20 16:28                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-17 16:14     ` Sean V Kelley
2020-10-19 19:07       ` Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 13/15] PCI/AER: Add pcie_walk_rcec() to RCEC AER handling Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 14/15] PCI/PME: Add pcie_walk_rcec() to RCEC PME handling Sean V Kelley
2020-10-16  0:11 ` [PATCH v9 15/15] PCI/AER: Add RCEC AER error injection support Sean V Kelley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F54EEC0-3933-4A2E-87BC-23FABECB0C0A@intel.com \
    --to=sean.v.kelley@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=okaya@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@intel.com \
    --cc=seanvk.dev@oregontracks.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=xerces.zhao@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-PCI Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/0 linux-pci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-pci linux-pci/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci \
		linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-pci

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-pci


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git