From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 21/22] PCI: cleanups for PCI bus lock implementation
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:58:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50504EB9.7000906@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo4ubTSu5cSrLVfs5UHc44KgtzO_OxL_QganfhqYn2hUWQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2012-9-12 7:21, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Now all Archs have been converted to the new PCI bus lock mechanism,
>> so clean up unused code.
>
> When you say "all arches," do you really mean "x86 and ia64"? I
> assume all the other architectures have similar issues. Or is this
> somehow ACPI-specific?
Hi Bjorn,
It's still RFC to give an overview of the whole patch set.
Here I mean once we have enhanced all arches, we will apply following patches:)
I'm working to enhance all arches recently, and will post the latest patch
once it passes basic tests.
Thanks!
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/Kconfig | 3 ---
>> drivers/pci/bus.c | 1 -
>> drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 9 ---------
>> drivers/pci/probe.c | 4 +---
>> include/linux/pci.h | 10 ----------
>> 5 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>> index 5a796c0..848bfb8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>> @@ -120,6 +120,3 @@ config PCI_IOAPIC
>> config PCI_LABEL
>> def_bool y if (DMI || ACPI)
>> select NLS
>> -
>> -config PCI_BUS_LOCK
>> - def_bool y if (X86 || IA64)
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
>> index 371f20a..308c376 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
>> @@ -196,7 +196,6 @@ int pci_bus_add_child(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> pci_create_legacy_files(bus);
>> pci_bus_change_state(bus, PCI_BUS_STATE_INITIALIZED,
>> PCI_BUS_STATE_WORKING, false);
>> - bus->is_added = 1;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>> index 11043b4..a5a4195 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>> @@ -284,7 +284,6 @@ msi_bus_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG
>> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_remove_rescan_mutex);
>> static ssize_t bus_rescan_store(struct bus_type *bus, const char *buf,
>> size_t count)
>> {
>> @@ -296,13 +295,11 @@ static ssize_t bus_rescan_store(struct bus_type *bus, const char *buf,
>>
>> if (val) {
>> pci_host_bridge_hotplug_lock();
>> - mutex_lock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex);
>> while ((b = pci_find_next_bus(b)) != NULL)
>> if (pci_bus_lock_states(b, PCI_BUS_STATE_WORKING) > 0) {
>> pci_rescan_bus(b);
>> pci_bus_unlock(b);
>> }
>> - mutex_unlock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex);
>> pci_host_bridge_hotplug_unlock();
>> }
>> return count;
>> @@ -326,13 +323,11 @@ dev_rescan_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> if (val) {
>> struct pci_bus *bus = pdev->bus;
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex);
>> if (pci_bus_lock_states(bus, PCI_BUS_STATE_WORKING) > 0) {
>> if (pdev->is_added)
>> pci_rescan_bus(bus);
>> pci_bus_unlock(bus);
>> }
>> - mutex_unlock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex);
>> }
>> return count;
>> }
>> @@ -342,13 +337,11 @@ static void remove_callback(struct device *dev)
>> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> struct pci_bus *bus = pdev->bus;
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex);
>> if (pci_bus_lock_states(bus, PCI_BUS_STATE_WORKING) > 0) {
>> pci_bus_get(bus);
>> pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(pdev);
>> pci_unlock_and_put_bus(bus);
>> }
>> - mutex_unlock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex);
>> }
>>
>> static ssize_t
>> @@ -382,14 +375,12 @@ dev_bus_rescan_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> if (val) {
>> - mutex_lock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex);
>> if (!pci_is_root_bus(bus))
>> pci_rescan_bus_bridge_resize(bus->self);
>> else if (pci_bus_lock_states(bus, PCI_BUS_STATE_WORKING) > 0) {
>> pci_rescan_bus(bus);
>> pci_bus_unlock(bus);
>> }
>> - mutex_unlock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex);
>> }
>> return count;
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index da6f04c..09517c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -1626,11 +1626,9 @@ unsigned int __devinit pci_scan_child_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> if (pci_bus_get_state(bus) < PCI_BUS_STATE_WORKING) {
>> dev_dbg(&bus->dev, "fixups for bus\n");
>> pcibios_fixup_bus(bus);
>> - if (pci_is_root_bus(bus)) {
>> + if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
>> pci_bus_change_state(bus, PCI_BUS_STATE_REGISTERED,
>> PCI_BUS_STATE_WORKING, false);
>> - bus->is_added = 1;
>> - }
>> }
>>
>> for (pass=0; pass < 2; pass++)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index 9e52e88..0e50ec8 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> @@ -442,7 +442,6 @@ struct pci_bus {
>> struct device dev;
>> struct bin_attribute *legacy_io; /* legacy I/O for this bus */
>> struct bin_attribute *legacy_mem; /* legacy mem */
>> - unsigned int is_added:1;
>> atomic_t state;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -463,21 +462,12 @@ struct pci_bus {
>> #define PCI_BUS_STATE_DESTROYED 0x40 /* invalid state */
>> #define PCI_BUS_STATE_MASK 0x7F
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_BUS_LOCK
>> #define PCI_BUS_STATE_LOCK 0x10000 /* for pci core only */
>>
>> static inline bool pci_bus_is_locked(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> {
>> return !!(atomic_read(&bus->state) & PCI_BUS_STATE_LOCK);
>> }
>> -#else /* CONFIG_PCI_BUS_LOCK */
>> -#define PCI_BUS_STATE_LOCK 0x0000 /* for pci core only */
>> -
>> -static inline bool pci_bus_is_locked(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> -{
>> - return true;
>> -}
>> -#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_BUS_LOCK */
>>
>> static inline int pci_bus_get_state(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> {
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-12 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-07 16:10 [RFC PATCH v1 00/22] introduce PCI bus lock to serialize PCI hotplug operations Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/22] PCI: use pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() to avoid race conditions Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 22:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-12 8:37 ` Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/22] PCI: trivial cleanups for drivers/pci/remove.c Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 22:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-12 8:50 ` Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/22] PCI: change PCI device management code to better follow device model Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 22:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/22] PCI: split PCI bus device registration into two stages Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/22] PCI: introduce pci_bus_{get|put}() to manage PCI bus reference count Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/22] PCI: use a global lock to serialize PCI root bridge hotplug operations Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 22:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-12 15:42 ` Jiang Liu
2012-09-12 16:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: introduce root bridge hotplug safe interfaces to walk root buses Jiang Liu
2012-09-13 17:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-17 15:55 ` Jiang Liu
2012-09-17 16:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-18 21:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-21 16:07 ` [PATCH v4] PCI: introduce two interfaces to walk PCI buses Jiang Liu
2012-09-26 20:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: remove host bridge hotplug unsafe interface pci_get_next_bus() Jiang Liu
2012-09-17 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/22] PCI: use a global lock to serialize PCI root bridge hotplug operations Jiang Liu
2012-09-20 18:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/22] PCI: introduce PCI bus lock to serialize PCI " Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 23:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/22] PCI: introduce hotplug safe search interfaces for PCI bus/device Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/22] PCI: enhance PCI probe logic to support PCI bus lock mechanism Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/22] PCI: enhance PCI bus specific " Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/22] PCI: enhance PCI resource assignment " Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/22] PCI: enhance PCI remove " Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/22] PCI: make each PCI device hold a reference to its parent PCI bus Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/22] PCI/sysfs: use PCI bus lock to avoid race conditions Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/22] PCI/eeepc: " Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 23:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-12 14:24 ` [PATCH] eeepc-laptop: fix device reference count leakage in eeepc_rfkill_hotplug() Jiang Liu
2012-09-12 19:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/22] PCI/asus-wmi: use PCI bus lock to avoid race conditions Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/22] PCI/pciehp: " Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/22] PCI/acpiphp: " Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH v1 19/22] PCI/x86: enable PCI bus lock mechanism for x86 platforms Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 23:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-12 9:56 ` Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:11 ` [RFC PATCH v1 20/22] PCI/IA64: enable PCI bus lock mechanism for IA64 platforms Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 16:11 ` [RFC PATCH v1 21/22] PCI: cleanups for PCI bus lock implementation Jiang Liu
2012-09-11 23:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-12 8:58 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2012-08-07 16:11 ` [RFC PATCH v1 22/22] PCI: unexport pci_root_buses Jiang Liu
2012-08-07 18:11 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/22] introduce PCI bus lock to serialize PCI hotplug operations Don Dutile
2012-08-08 15:49 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50504EB9.7000906@huawei.com \
--to=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).