From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] cpumask: factor out show_cpumap into separate helper function
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:27:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54085AA1.7020600@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140904112551.GC346@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 04/09/14 12:25, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:43:18AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> You could make it bitmap_copy_to_buf() I suppose, and then have a
>>> cpumask inline wrapper, to be fully consistent with the rest of the
>>> implementations.
>>>
>>
>> I liked the second approach, how about patch below ?
>> If will munge it into original patch.
>
> Looks good, one more nit if you will permit :-)
>
Ofcourse :)
>> +int bitmap_copy_to_pagebuf(bool list, const unsigned long *maskp, char *buf)
>
> Maybe s/copy/print/ or something? Its not really a 'copy' as such since
> it very much transforms the bitmap.
>
Makes sense, will update accordingly.
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-04 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1409763617-17074-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2014-09-03 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] cpumask: factor out show_cpumap into separate helper function Sudeep Holla
2014-09-03 17:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-03 17:09 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-09-03 21:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-04 6:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-04 9:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-09-04 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-04 10:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-09-04 11:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-04 12:27 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2014-09-04 15:46 ` [PATCH v4 01/11 UPDATE] " Sudeep Holla
2014-09-19 22:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-09-24 8:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-09-24 10:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54085AA1.7020600@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).