From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <541045BE.9050804@citrix.com> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:36:14 +0100 From: David Vrabel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yijing Wang , Bjorn Helgaas CC: , , , , , , , Russell King , Joerg Roedel , , Sebastian Ott , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , , , Arnd Bergmann , Chris Metcalf , Thomas Gleixner , , Xinwei Hu , Tony Luck , Ralf Baechle , , Wuyun , , "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 04/21] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq() References: <1409911806-10519-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1409911806-10519-5-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1409911806-10519-5-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/09/14 11:09, Yijing Wang wrote: > Commit 0e4ccb150 added two __weak arch functions arch_msix_mask_irq() > and arch_msi_mask_irq() to fix a bug found when running xen in x86. > Introduced these two funcntions make MSI code complex. And mask/unmask > is the irq actions related to interrupt controller, should not use > weak arch functions to override mask/unmask interfaces. This patch > reverted commit 0e4ccb150 and export struct irq_chip msi_chip, modify > msi_chip->irq_mask/irq_unmask() in xen init functions to fix this > bug for simplicity. Also this is preparation for using struct > msi_chip instead of weak arch MSI functions in all platforms. Acked-by: David Vrabel But I wonder if it would be better the Xen subsystem to provide its own struct irq_chip instead of adjusting the fields in the generic x86 one. David