From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fllnx210.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.17]:9306 "EHLO fllnx210.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750705AbdLZMvI (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:51:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/18] PCI: designware-ep: Add generic function for raising MSI irq To: Niklas Cassel , Jingoo Han , Joao Pinto , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas References: <20171219232940.659-1-niklas.cassel@axis.com> <20171219232940.659-7-niklas.cassel@axis.com> CC: Niklas Cassel , , From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Message-ID: <5fc44bf0-9d0e-e905-32fb-449d9ed1b01a@ti.com> Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 18:20:54 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171219232940.659-7-niklas.cassel@axis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Niklas, On Wednesday 20 December 2017 04:59 AM, Niklas Cassel wrote: > Add a generic function for raising MSI irqs that can be used by all > DWC based controllers. > > Note that certain controllers, like DRA7xx, have a special convenience > register for raising MSI irqs that doesn't require you to explicitly map > the MSI address. Therefore, it is likely that certain drivers will > not use this generic function, even if they can. > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel > --- > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 9 +++++++++ > 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > index 700ed2f4becf..c5aa1cac5041 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c > @@ -282,6 +282,41 @@ static const struct pci_epc_ops epc_ops = { > .stop = dw_pcie_ep_stop, > }; > > +int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, > + u8 interrupt_num) > +{ > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); > + struct pci_epc *epc = ep->epc; > + u16 msg_ctrl, msg_data; > + u32 msg_addr_lower, msg_addr_upper; > + u64 msg_addr; > + bool has_upper; > + int ret; > + > + /* Raise MSI per the PCI Local Bus Specification Revision 3.0, 6.8.1. */ > + msg_ctrl = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_CONTROL); > + has_upper = !!(msg_ctrl & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT); > + msg_addr_lower = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_ADDR_L32); > + if (has_upper) { > + msg_addr_upper = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_ADDR_U32); > + msg_data = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_DATA_64); > + } else { > + msg_addr_upper = 0; > + msg_data = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_DATA_32); > + } > + msg_addr = ((u64) msg_addr_upper) << 32 | msg_addr_lower; > + ret = dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(epc, ep->msi_mem_phys, msg_addr, > + epc->mem->page_size); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + writel(msg_data | (interrupt_num - 1), ep->msi_mem); Shouldn't this be msg_data + (interrupt_num - 1)? Thanks Kishon