From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ashok.raj@intel.com,
Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] PCI/ERR: Fix reset logic in pcie_do_recovery() call
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:44:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <704c39bf-6f0c-bba3-70b8-91de6a445e43@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922233333.GA2239404@bjorn-Precision-5520>
On 9/22/20 4:33 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:44:51PM -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/22/20 11:52 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:07:55PM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com wrote:
>>>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Current pcie_do_recovery() implementation has following two issues:
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm having trouble parsing this out, probably just lack of my
>>> understanding...
>>>
>>>> 1. Fatal (DPC) error recovery is currently broken for non-hotplug
>>>> capable devices. Current fatal error recovery implementation relies
>>>> on PCIe hotplug (pciehp) handler for detaching and re-enumerating
>>>> the affected devices/drivers. pciehp handler listens for DLLSC state
>>>> changes and handles device/driver detachment on DLLSC_LINK_DOWN event
>>>> and re-enumeration on DLLSC_LINK_UP event. So when dealing with
>>>> non-hotplug capable devices, recovery code does not restore the state
>>>> of the affected devices correctly.
>>>
>>> Apparently in the hotplug case, something *does* restore the state of
>>> affected devices?
>>
>> Yes, in hotplug case, DLLSC state change handler takes over detachment
>> /cleanup and re-attachment of affected devices/drivers.
>
> Where does the restore happen here? I.e., what function does this?
DLLSC link down event will remove affected devices/drivers. And link up event
will re-create all devices.
on DLLSC link down event
->pciehp_ist()
->pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change()
->pciehp_disable_slot()
->__pciehp_disable_slot()
->remove_board()
->pciehp_unconfigure_device()
on DLLSC link up event
->pciehp_ist()
->pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change()
->pciehp_enable_slot()
->__pciehp_enable_slot()
->board_added()
->pciehp_configure_device()
>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-22 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3cad1a07-509b-ef51-f635-71def2ff8293@linux.intel.com>
2020-09-22 23:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] PCI/ERR: Fix reset logic in pcie_do_recovery() call Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-22 23:44 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan [this message]
2020-09-24 1:15 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-24 2:04 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-09-24 2:16 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-24 2:51 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-09-24 3:13 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-24 4:06 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-09-24 20:52 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-25 5:11 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-09-25 16:55 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-25 17:11 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-09-25 17:47 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-25 18:16 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-09-25 18:30 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-28 2:43 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-09-28 8:41 ` Ethan Zhao
2020-09-28 11:17 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-28 12:16 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-28 17:15 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-09-28 18:02 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-28 18:25 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-28 18:32 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-10-12 5:13 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-10-12 14:51 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-28 12:11 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-09-25 23:50 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-07-24 19:07 sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2020-09-01 5:41 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-09-22 18:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=704c39bf-6f0c-bba3-70b8-91de6a445e43@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).