From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Austin Bolen <austin_bolen@dell.com>,
Alexandru Gagniuc <alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Shyam Iyer <Shyam_Iyer@Dell.com>, Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PCI/LINK: bw_notification: Deduplicate reports for multi-function devices
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:05:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70cb1754e3f0da3b84712460b1017ac707cd2616.1553078908.git.lukas@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1553078908.git.lukas@wunner.de>
If a multi-function device's bandwidth is already limited when it is
enumerated, a message is logged only for function 0. By contrast, when
downtraining occurs after enumeration, a message is logged for all
functions. That's because the former uses pcie_report_downtraining(),
whereas the latter uses __pcie_print_link_status() (which doesn't filter
functions != 0). I am seeing this happen on a MacBookPro9,1 with a GPU
(function 0) and an integrated HDA controller (function 1).
Avoid this incongruence by calling pcie_report_downtraining() in both
cases.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
---
drivers/pci/pci.h | 1 +
drivers/pci/pcie/bw_notification.c | 2 +-
drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index 224d88634115..d994839a3e24 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ enum pcie_link_width pcie_get_width_cap(struct pci_dev *dev);
u32 pcie_bandwidth_capable(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_bus_speed *speed,
enum pcie_link_width *width);
void __pcie_print_link_status(struct pci_dev *dev, bool verbose);
+void pcie_report_downtraining(struct pci_dev *dev);
/* Single Root I/O Virtualization */
struct pci_sriov {
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/bw_notification.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/bw_notification.c
index 69e6ba2558bf..c26045f2a890 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/bw_notification.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/bw_notification.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pcie_bw_notification_handler(int irq, void *context)
*/
down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
list_for_each_entry(dev, &port->subordinate->devices, bus_list)
- __pcie_print_link_status(dev, false);
+ pcie_report_downtraining(dev);
up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
pcie_capability_read_word(port, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &link_status);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 2ec0df04e0dc..7e12d0163863 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -2388,7 +2388,7 @@ static struct pci_dev *pci_scan_device(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
return dev;
}
-static void pcie_report_downtraining(struct pci_dev *dev)
+void pcie_report_downtraining(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
return;
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-20 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-20 11:05 [PATCH 0/2] Link bandwidth notification fixes Lukas Wunner
2019-03-20 11:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI/LINK: bw_notification: Clear interrupt before enabling it Lukas Wunner
2019-03-25 18:50 ` Alex_Gagniuc
2019-03-20 11:05 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2019-03-25 18:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI/LINK: bw_notification: Deduplicate reports for multi-function devices Alex_Gagniuc
2019-03-25 22:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] Link bandwidth notification fixes Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70cb1754e3f0da3b84712460b1017ac707cd2616.1553078908.git.lukas@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=Shyam_Iyer@Dell.com \
--cc=alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com \
--cc=austin_bolen@dell.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
--cc=okaya@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).