linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] PCI: rcar: Support runtime PM, link state L1 handling
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 01:54:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77d1eaf8-e180-f5f5-50f0-34c45e72c553@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180611135912.GD75679@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>

On 06/11/2018 03:59 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 03:57:10PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 11/17/2017 06:49 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:58:42PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> From: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>>>
>>>> Most PCIe host controllers support L0s and L1 power states via ASPM.
>>>> The R-Car hardware only supports L0s, so when the system suspends and
>>>> resumes we have to manually handle L1.
>>>> When the system suspends, cards can put themselves into L1 and send a
>>>
>>> I assumed L1 entry has to be negotiated depending upon the PCIe
>>> hierarchy capabilities, I would appreciate if you can explain to
>>> me what's the root cause of the issue please.
>>
>> You should probably ignore the suspend/resume part altogether. The issue
>> here is that the cards can enter L1 state, while the controller won't do
>> that automatically, it can only detect that the link went into L1 state.
>> If that happens,the driver must manually put the controller to L1 state.
>> The controller can transition out of L1 state automatically though.
> 
> From earlier discussion I thought the R-Car root port did not
> advertise L1 support.

Which discussion ? This one or somewhere else ?

> If that's the case, we shouldn't enable L1
> entry on a card.  Is the core ASPM code doing something wrong here?

I can double-check, am I looking for some particular register in the
PCIe space ?

>>>> PM_ENTER_L1 DLLP to the host controller. At this point, we can no longer
>>>> access the card's config registers.
>>>>
>>>> The R-Car host controller will handle taking cards out of L1 as long as
>>>> the host controller has also been transitioned to L1 link state.
>>>
>>> I wonder why this can't be done in a PM restore hook but that's not
>>> really where my question is.
>>
>> I suspect because the link can be in L1 during startup too?
>>
>>>> Ideally, we would detect the PM_ENTER_L1 DLLP using an interrupt and
>>>> transition the host to L1 immediately. However, this patch just ensures
>>>> that we can talk to cards after they have gone into L1.
>>>
>>>> When attempting a config access, it checks to see if the card has gone
>>>> into L1, and if so, does the same for the host controller.
>>>>
>>>> This is based on a patch by Hien Dang <hien.dang.eb@rvc.renesas.com>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>>>> Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>>> Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
>>>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
>>>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
>>>> ---
>>>> V2: - Drop extra parenthesis
>>>>     - Use GENMASK()
>>>>     - Fix comment "The HW will handle coming of of L1.", s/of of/out of/
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
>>>> index ab61829db389..068bf9067ec1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
>>>> @@ -92,6 +92,13 @@
>>>>  #define MACCTLR			0x011058
>>>>  #define  SPEED_CHANGE		BIT(24)
>>>>  #define  SCRAMBLE_DISABLE	BIT(27)
>>>> +#define PMSR			0x01105c
>>>> +#define  L1FAEG			BIT(31)
>>>> +#define  PM_ENTER_L1RX		BIT(23)
>>>> +#define  PMSTATE		GENMASK(18, 16)
>>>> +#define  PMSTATE_L1		GENMASK(17, 16)
>>>> +#define PMCTLR			0x011060
>>>> +#define  L1_INIT		BIT(31)
>>>>  #define MACS2R			0x011078
>>>>  #define MACCGSPSETR		0x011084
>>>>  #define  SPCNGRSN		BIT(31)
>>>> @@ -191,6 +198,7 @@ static int rcar_pcie_config_access(struct rcar_pcie *pcie,
>>>>  		unsigned int devfn, int where, u32 *data)
>>>>  {
>>>>  	int dev, func, reg, index;
>>>> +	u32 val;
>>>>  
>>>>  	dev = PCI_SLOT(devfn);
>>>>  	func = PCI_FUNC(devfn);
>>>> @@ -232,6 +240,22 @@ static int rcar_pcie_config_access(struct rcar_pcie *pcie,
>>>>  	if (pcie->root_bus_nr < 0)
>>>>  		return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
>>>>  
>>>> +	/*
>>>> +	 * If we are not in L1 link state and we have received PM_ENTER_L1 DLLP,
>>>> +	 * transition to L1 link state. The HW will handle coming out of L1.
>>>> +	 */
>>>> +	val = rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PMSR);
>>>> +	if (val & PM_ENTER_L1RX && (val & PMSTATE) != PMSTATE_L1) {
>>>> +		rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, L1_INIT, PMCTLR);
>>>> +
>>>> +		/* Wait until we are in L1 */
>>>> +		while (!(val & L1FAEG))
>>>> +			val = rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PMSR);
>>>> +
>>>> +		/* Clear flags indicating link has transitioned to L1 */
>>>> +		rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, L1FAEG | PM_ENTER_L1RX, PMSR);
>>>> +	}
>>>
>>> I do not get why you need to add the DLLP check for _every_ given config
>>> access and how/why it is just related to suspend/resume and not eg cold
>>> boot (I supposed it is because devices can enter L1 upon suspend(?)), I
>>> would ask you please to provide a thorough explanation so that I can
>>> actually review this patch (the commit log must be rewritten nonetheless,
>>> I do not think it is clear, at least it is not for me).
>>
>> See above
>>
>> -- 
>> Best regards,
>> Marek Vasut


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-12 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-10 21:58 [PATCH V2 0/5] PCI: rcar: Add suspend/resume support Marek Vasut
2017-11-10 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] PCI: rcar: Poll more often in rcar_pcie_wait_for_dl() Marek Vasut
2017-11-13  7:03   ` Simon Horman
2017-11-10 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] PCI: rcar: Clean up the macros Marek Vasut
2017-11-13  7:03   ` Simon Horman
2017-11-13 18:11     ` Marek Vasut
2017-11-15 13:28       ` Simon Horman
2017-11-22 11:20         ` Marek Vasut
2017-11-10 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: rcar: Add the initialization of PCIe link in resume_noirq Marek Vasut
2017-11-13  7:05   ` Simon Horman
2017-11-10 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] PCI: rcar: Support runtime PM, link state L1 handling Marek Vasut
2017-11-13  7:05   ` Simon Horman
2017-11-17 17:49   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-06-10 13:57     ` Marek Vasut
2018-06-11 13:59       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-06-12 23:54         ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2018-06-13 13:53           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-06-13 15:52             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-06-13 17:25               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-06-14 11:43                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-07-25 21:08                 ` Marek Vasut
2018-08-08 13:29                   ` Marek Vasut
2018-08-20 13:44                     ` Phil Edworthy
2018-08-20 14:47                       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-08-21  8:58                         ` Phil Edworthy
2018-08-21 15:32                           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-08-22  9:20                             ` Phil Edworthy
2018-08-14 16:25                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-11-10 21:58 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] PCI: rcar: Add the suspend/resume for pcie-rcar driver Marek Vasut
2017-11-15 13:27   ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77d1eaf8-e180-f5f5-50f0-34c45e72c553@gmail.com \
    --to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms+renesas@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com \
    --cc=phil.edworthy@renesas.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).