From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
To: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>, <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
<lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: tegra: move to use request_irq by IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 15:32:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78dd0d27-aca7-9d99-a79d-8587a2fbbbfb@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e203ed5-526f-3a45-9f82-ba3f567bcc83@nvidia.com>
I want to re-examine this patch.
I don't see any references in the kernel where IRQ_NOAUTOEN is passed
directly in request_irq APIs. It is always set explicitly through
irq_set_status_flags() *before* calling request_irq APIs.
I don't see any comment in the header file either that says something
like it should always be set before requesting the irq.
Lorenzo/Bjorn, could you please throw some light on what is correct
thing to do here?
Thanks,
Vidya Sagar
On 5/17/2021 3:47 PM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> Reviewed-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
>
> - Vidya Sagar
>
> On 5/17/2021 6:42 AM, Tian Tao wrote:
>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>
>>
>> request_irq() after setting IRQ_NOAUTOEN as below
>> irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
>> request_irq(dev, irq...);
>> can be replaced by request_irq() with IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag.
>>
>> this change is just to simplify the code, no actual functional changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
>> ---
>>
>> v2: update the commit message.
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 5 ++---
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
>> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
>> index bafd2c6..7349926 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
>> @@ -2021,14 +2021,13 @@ static int tegra_pcie_config_ep(struct
>> tegra_pcie_dw *pcie,
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>>
>> - irq_set_status_flags(pcie->pex_rst_irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
>> -
>> pcie->ep_state = EP_STATE_DISABLED;
>>
>> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, pcie->pex_rst_irq, NULL,
>> tegra_pcie_ep_pex_rst_irq,
>> IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING |
>> - IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING |
>> IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING |
>> + IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN
>> name, (void *)pcie);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> dev_err(dev, "Failed to request IRQ for PERST: %d\n",
>> ret);
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-31 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-17 1:12 [PATCH v2] PCI: tegra: move to use request_irq by IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag Tian Tao
2021-05-17 10:17 ` Vidya Sagar
2021-05-31 10:02 ` Vidya Sagar [this message]
2021-06-23 9:45 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-06-23 12:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-26 20:48 ` Michał Mirosław
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78dd0d27-aca7-9d99-a79d-8587a2fbbbfb@nvidia.com \
--to=vidyas@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=tiantao6@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).