linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: PCI, isolcpus, and irq affinity
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:49:37 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83d03f27-d92d-1b28-ad28-cbe5d011fe33@windriver.com> (raw)

Hi,

I'm not subscribed to the list so please CC me on replies.

I've got a linux system running the RT kernel with threaded irqs.  On 
startup we affine the various irq threads to the housekeeping CPUs, but 
I recently hit a scenario where after some days of uptime we ended up 
with a number of NVME irq threads affined to application cores instead 
(not good when we're trying to run low-latency applications).

Looking at the code, it appears that the NVME driver can in some 
scenarios end up calling pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity() after initial 
system startup, which seems to determine CPU affinity without any regard 
for things like "isolcpus" or "cset shield".

There seem to be other reports of similar issues:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1831566

It looks like some SCSI drivers and virtio_pci_common.c will also call 
pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity(), though I'm not sure if they would ever 
do it after system startup.

How does it make sense for the PCI subsystem to affine interrupts to 
CPUs which have explicitly been designated as "isolated"?

Thanks,

Chris



             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-12 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-12 15:49 Chris Friesen [this message]
2020-10-12 16:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-12 17:39   ` Sean V Kelley
2020-10-12 19:18     ` Chris Friesen
2020-10-12 17:42   ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-10-12 17:50   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-12 18:58     ` Chris Friesen
2020-10-12 19:07       ` Keith Busch
2020-10-12 19:44         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-15 18:47         ` Chris Friesen
2020-10-15 19:02           ` Keith Busch
2020-10-12 19:31       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-12 20:24         ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-12 22:25           ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83d03f27-d92d-1b28-ad28-cbe5d011fe33@windriver.com \
    --to=chris.friesen@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: PCI, isolcpus, and irq affinity' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).