From: Alex G <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, helgaas@kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, austin_bolen@dell.com,
alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com, keith.busch@intel.com,
Shyam_Iyer@Dell.com, lukas@wunner.de, okaya@kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/LINK: Account for BW notification in vector calculation
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:33:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84300da7-9bbd-4f32-c7fa-23724db60b88@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190422183347.51ba522c@x1.home>
On 4/22/19 7:33 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:05:57 -0500
> Alex G <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> wrote:
>> echo 0000:07:00.0:pcie010 |
>> sudo tee /sys/bus/pci_express/drivers/pcie_bw_notification/unbind
>
> That's a bad solution for users, this is meaningless tracking of a
> device whose driver is actively managing the link bandwidth for power
> purposes.
0.5W savings on a 100+W GPU? I agree it's meaningless.
> There is nothing wrong happening here that needs to fill
> logs. I thought maybe if I enabled notification of autonomous
> bandwidth changes that it might categorize these as something we could
> ignore, but it doesn't.
> How can we identify only cases where this is
> an erroneous/noteworthy situation? Thanks,
You don't. Ethernet doesn't. USB doesn't. This logging behavior is
consistent with every other subsystem that deals with multi-speed links.
I realize some people are very resistant to change (and use very ancient
kernels). I do not, however, agree that this is a sufficient argument to
dis-unify behavior.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-23 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-22 22:43 Alex Williamson
2019-04-23 0:05 ` Alex G
2019-04-23 0:33 ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-23 14:33 ` Alex G [this message]
2019-04-23 15:34 ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-23 15:49 ` Lukas Wunner
2019-04-23 16:03 ` Alex G
2019-04-23 16:22 ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-23 16:27 ` Alex G
2019-04-23 16:37 ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-23 17:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-04-23 17:53 ` Alex G
2019-04-23 18:38 ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-23 17:59 ` Alex G
2019-05-01 20:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84300da7-9bbd-4f32-c7fa-23724db60b88@gmail.com \
--to=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
--cc=Shyam_Iyer@Dell.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com \
--cc=austin_bolen@dell.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=okaya@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] PCI/LINK: Account for BW notification in vector calculation' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).