From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E702C56201 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3936E2085B for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="sCWgsPzE" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725966AbgKLHPb (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 02:15:31 -0500 Received: from m42-4.mailgun.net ([69.72.42.4]:40804 "EHLO m42-4.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725902AbgKLHPb (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 02:15:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1605165330; h=Content-Type: MIME-Version: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Date: References: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=WuH0X4Zbc8l0BtZkfgnujvdmJYwemhfesSmnVJ9Y6Mk=; b=sCWgsPzE+Rv98WvQtkFi7JBWXM7+oddDK2GBcn7Z+TwIKyTdTdI90cttC6U1vvz4lFOW822R AeDJhqrCDgAopqGnmy3V0kqhsGx+9cWXs4gubsp6GtNRvyHe+GaDbEjAGoVp6Pido2ELAAkb QZ7F9KEG6C9ttkYFSRnhhNSZF54= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.42.4 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI2YzdiNyIsICJsaW51eC1wY2lAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n01.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5face10b37ede2253be4c046 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:15:23 GMT Sender: kvalo=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B0148C43387; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:15:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2910C433C6; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:15:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org D2910C433C6 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Stefani Seibold Cc: wi nk , Govind Singh , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Devin Bayer , ath11k@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Krause , Bjorn Helgaas , David Woodhouse , Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: pci_alloc_irq_vectors fails ENOSPC for XPS 13 9310 References: <20201103160838.GA246433@bjorn-Precision-5520> <874km61732.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87mtzxkus5.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87wnz0hr9k.fsf@codeaurora.org> <87ft5hehlb.fsf@codeaurora.org> <6b60c8f1-ec37-d601-92c2-97a485b73431@posteo.de> <87v9ec9rk3.fsf@codeaurora.org> <87imab4slq.fsf@codeaurora.org> <0b58872b4f27dbf5aad2a39f5ec4a066e080d806.camel@seibold.net> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:15:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0b58872b4f27dbf5aad2a39f5ec4a066e080d806.camel@seibold.net> (Stefani Seibold's message of "Thu, 12 Nov 2020 08:05:40 +0100") Message-ID: <875z6b3v22.fsf@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Stefani Seibold writes: > Am Donnerstag, den 12.11.2020, 02:10 +0100 schrieb wi nk: >> I've yet to see any instability after 45 minutes of exercising it, I >> do see a couple of messages that came out of the driver: >> >> [ 8.963389] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: Unknown eventid: 0x16005 >> [ 11.342317] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: Unknown eventid: 0x1d00a >> >> then when it associates: >> >> [ 16.718895] wlp85s0: send auth to ec:08:6b:27:01:ea (try 1/3) >> [ 16.722636] wlp85s0: authenticated >> [ 16.724150] wlp85s0: associate with ec:08:6b:27:01:ea (try 1/3) >> [ 16.726486] wlp85s0: RX AssocResp from ec:08:6b:27:01:ea >> (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=8) >> [ 16.738443] wlp85s0: associated >> [ 16.764966] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlp85s0: link becomes >> ready >> >> The adapter is achieving around 500 mbps on my gigabit connection, my >> 2018 mbp sees around 650, so it's doing pretty well so far. >> >> Stefani - when you applied the patch that Kalle shared, which branch >> did you apply it to? I applied it to ath11k-qca6390-bringup and when >> I revert 7fef431be9c9 there is a small merge conflict I needed to >> resolve. I wonder if either the starting branch, or your chosen >> resolution are related to the instability you see (or I'm just lucky >> so far! :)). >> > > I used the vanilla kernel tree > https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-5.10-rc2.tar.gz. On top of this > i applied the > > RFT-ath11k-pci-support-platforms-with-one-MSI-vector.patch > > and reverted the patch 7fef431be9c9 I did also my testing on v5.10-rc2 and I recommend to use that as the baseline when debuggin these ath11k problems. It helps to compare the results if everyone have the same baseline. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches